Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-04

    ACC’s motion and memorandum for summary judgment regarding the absence of a water right for Third Runway § 401 certification

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) moves for summary judgment before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, arguing that the Department of Ecology’s Section 401 Certification for the Port of Seattle’s Third Runway Project is invalid because the Port lacks a water right to permanently mitigate low flow impacts on Des Moines, Miller, and Walker Creeks. ACC
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-04

    Declaration of Michael P. Witek in support of ACC’s motion for summary judgment

    Attorney Michael P. Witek of the Airport Communities Coalition declares under penalty of perjury that exhibits attached to this declaration are true and correct copies of previously filed documents. The declaration supports ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment related to Section 401 Certification and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, concerning construction of a Third
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-04

    Order granting ACC’s motion for summary judgment regarding the absence of a water right

    A proposed order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington granting the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for summary judgment on Issue No. 9(a), concerning whether a water right is required for implementation of the Port of Seattle’s low flow mitigation plan for the Third Runway Project. The Board found no reasonable
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-02

    Petition for review of agency action

    The Port of Seattle filed a petition for judicial review in Thurston County Superior Court challenging the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s order granting a motion to stay the effectiveness of a Section 401 Certification related to the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The petition names the PCHB, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against SeaTac
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-01

    Order granting ACC’s motion to compel inspection of Port property

    This is a proposed order from the Environmental Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington granting Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to compel inspection of Port of Seattle property. The order requires the Port of Seattle to allow ACC’s experts, counsel, paralegal, and client representatives to observe, photograph, and sample wetlands, soils, and streams
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-01

    Order granting summary judgment on Issue 14

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board of Washington State grants summary judgment in favor of the Port of Seattle on Issue No. 14, which asked whether Ecology and the Port complied with SEPA. The case involves an appeal by the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion of a Section 401 water quality certification issued
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-31

    CASE’s preliminary list of new witnesses and exhibits

    Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) submits its preliminary list of witnesses and exhibits to the Pollution Control Hearings Board for Washington State, as required by the Board’s Order Granting Intervention dated December 21, 2001. The witness list includes representatives from King County DNR, and the exhibit list covers construction stormwater monitoring documents, the NPDES permit,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-22

    ACC’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding absence of water right

    The Airport Communities Coalition filed a motion for partial summary judgment arguing that the Port of Seattle lacked a water right necessary to permanently mitigate low flow impacts from its proposed third runway project. The motion contends that without such a water right, the Department of Ecology could not have had reasonable assurance that water
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-19

    Guidance for the use of tables: Practical quantitation limits (PQLs), method detection limit (MDLs), and PQL comparisons to Method B cleanup levels

    This document is Part II of a four-part guidance series related to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), explaining how to use tables of Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs) and Method Detection Limits (MDLs) for cleanup site managers in Washington State. It describes the purpose of PQLs and MDLs, how they compare to MTCA Method B
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-18

    Port Of Seattle document inconsistencies letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, writes to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifying inconsistencies in the Port of Seattle’s proposals for site development and stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter presents two main comments: that proposed future land use development at borrow pit areas contradicts the Port’s justification for
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aerial View of Freeway Overpass with Texaco Station and Riparian Vegetation, Greater Seattle Area" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V