Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSustainable Airport Master Plan(233)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2025-09-29

    Appendix O: Agency & Public Engagement — Submitted Studies and Materials

    The 1997 Sea-Tac International Airport Impact Mitigation Study is an initial assessment and recommendations report prepared for several cities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, as well as the Highline School District and Highline Community Hospital. Funded by a State of Washington grant, the study was conducted by Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. and Raytheon Infrastructure Services, Inc. to evaluate the airport's impacts on surrounding communities. The report was submitted as part of public engagement materials related to ongoing concerns about airport noise and air pollution affecting nearby residents and institutions.
    TagsCACC, community engagement, Defenders Of Highline Forest, NEPA, SAMP, Steve Edmiston, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolderAppendices
  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Annual Passenger Growth Chart, 1948–2023

    A line graph documenting annual passenger volumes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) from 1948 to 2023, highlighting key milestones including 130,600 passengers at opening in 1949, a record 51.8 million passengers in 2019, a Covid-related drop to 20 million in 2020, and a recovery to 50.8 million in 2023. The chart notes the airport was originally built in 1949 to handle half a million passengers annually.
    TagsNEPA, SAMP, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolder2024 Draft EA
  • Airport-Merritt-resized-1

    A 3D aerial rendering of an airport expansion plan highlighting five labeled elements: New Terminal 2, Expanded N Gates, Roadway Improvements, New Ground Transportation Center, and Updated Landscaping. The specific airport is not identified by name in any visible text within the image.
    TagsSAMP, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolderSAMP
  • 2025-09-01

    Appendix K: Children’s Environmental Health and Safety Risks, Socioeconomics, and Environmental Justice (NEPA Final EA and SEPA)

    Appendix K of this environmental review examines socioeconomic conditions, environmental justice, and children's health and safety risks in the area surrounding the proposed project. It finds that 23.3% of the population in the study area is under 18—higher than both King County and statewide averages—and identifies two schools within the project boundary that could expose children to environmental health risks. The appendix also includes an economic impact analysis for the Northwest Seaport Alliance and a separate environmental justice memorandum prepared under Washington State's environmental review process.
    TagsEconomic Impacts, Environmental Justice, NEPA, SAMP, SEPA, Socioeconomic Impacts, Studies, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolderAppendicesStudy TopicsEconomics, Socioeconomics
  • 2025-07-28

    Appendix D: Biological Opinion and Essential Fish Habitat Response for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects

    The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a Biological Opinion on July 28, 2025, in response to a Federal Aviation Administration consultation request regarding near-term construction projects outlined in the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan. The opinion evaluates potential effects of these projects on endangered species and critical fish habitat under the Endangered Species Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. NMFS reviewed and independently verified analyses from the FAA's Biological Evaluation, incorporating findings related to the proposed action area, species status, and effects on critical habitat.
    TagsESA, FAA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPA, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolderAppendices
  • 2025-07-28

    Appendix D: Biological Resources — ESA Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and EFH Response for Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects

    The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a Biological Opinion on July 28, 2025, in response to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) consultation request regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects. The opinion evaluates potential effects of the planned airport projects on endangered species and critical fish habitat under the Endangered Species Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The review drew on a Final Biological Evaluation prepared by the FAA to assess impacts on species status, critical habitat, and the surrounding environment.
    TagsESA, FAA, NEPA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolderAppendices
  • 2024-12-13

    Comments on the FAA EA: SAMP Draft Environmental Assessment (Debi Wagner)

    This document presents formal public comments opposing an FAA Environmental Assessment for expansion projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The author argues that the stated justification for expansion is misleading, contending that airport growth would not automatically occur without new gates and terminals since FAA safety rules already cap the number of aircraft operations. Additional concerns raised include disproportionate health burdens on nearby communities, unreliable air pollution modeling, inadequate environmental justice analysis, and failure to properly assess cumulative public health and climate impacts.
    TagsClean Air Act, Debi Wagner, Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Justice, FAA, NAAQS, NEPA, SAMP, SAMP Draft EA, Sea-Tac Airport, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolder2024 Comment
  • 2024-12-13

    SAMP Comments: Stuart Jenner Public Comment on 2024 Draft Environmental Assessment

    Seatac Airport neighbor Stuart Jenner submitted public comments in December 2024 criticizing the Port of Seattle's Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), arguing that citizens were given inadequate time to review over 4,000 pages of documents and that an Environmental Impact Statement—not merely an Environmental Assessment—is needed to properly evaluate the plan's effects on nearby residents. Jenner raises concerns about opaque computer models used to claim a nearly 50% increase in passenger traffic would have no environmental impact, shifting baseline comparisons that ignore past promises made during the third runway approval, and the absence of project cost information. He calls on Port Commissioners and the FAA to extend the public comment period and subject the plan to greater independent scrutiny.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, SAMP, SAMP Draft EA, Sea-Tac Airport, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolder2024 Comment
  • 2024-12-13

    City of Des Moines Letter to Port Of Seattle: Comments on SAMP Draft Environmental Assessment

    The City of Des Moines, Washington submitted formal comments to the Port of Seattle in December 2024, raising concerns about the environmental and health impacts of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's planned growth. The city warns that by 2032, annual flight operations will increase by nearly 20%, expanding the noise exposure zone and raising the number of residents affected by significant aircraft noise from roughly 14,000 to nearly 22,000—with most of that burden falling on Des Moines residents. The letter calls on the Port and FAA to extend public comment periods, pursue meaningful noise mitigation measures such as sound insulation for homes and schools, and engage more collaboratively with impacted communities rather than treating public review as a formality.
    TagsCity Of Des Moines, NEPA, Part 150, SAMP, SAMP Draft EA, Sustainable Airport Master PlanFolder2024 Comment
  • 2024-12-13

    City of Tukwila Comment Letter on Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan Draft Environmental Assessment

    The City of Tukwila submitted formal comments on December 13, 2024, objecting to SeaTac Airport's Sustainable Airport Master Plan Draft Environmental Assessment (SAMP Draft EA), arguing that the study area is too narrow, covering only 3,692 acres, and fails to account for broader impacts on surrounding communities including increased traffic, air quality degradation, and noise under flight paths. The city contends that proposed mitigation measures are inadequate and that the assessment ignores equity and social justice concerns affecting the low-income, diverse communities near the airport. Tukwila is calling for a full Environmental Impact Statement with an expanded General Study Area that includes the entire city and broader South King County region.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Environmental Justice, NEPA, SAMP, SAMP Draft EA, South King County, Sustainable Airport Master Plan, TukwilaFolder2024 Comment

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 … Page 24
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V