Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(2026)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2020-05-29

    Appendix A, Section 9: Groundwater and Soil Quality — Study of the Current and Ongoing Effects of the Operation of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Stantec consultant team report (Section 9, Appendix A, pages A-224 to A-246) from the 2019 Department of Commerce Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study, dated 29 May 2020. Covers geologic, soil, and groundwater analytical data at and near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA) from 1997 to 2019, focusing on benchmark years 1997, 2009, and 2019. Topics include
    TagsPort Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Stantec, Water Quality
  • 2020-05-29

    Section 14: Summary — Study of the Current and Ongoing Effects of the Operation of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Section 14 Summary (pages A-354 to A-379) of the Stantec-led 2020 study commissioned under Department of Commerce Section 14, evaluating current and ongoing effects of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport) operations on six study area cities: Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila. Covers study approach (data period 1997–2019, milestone years 1997,
    TagsCommerce Impacts Study 2018, Noise, Sea-Tac Airport, South King County, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 7 – Mobility

    This 2020 report examines how Seattle-Tacoma International Airport has affected mobility in surrounding communities between 1997 and 2019, focusing on traffic congestion, residential parking, and pedestrian access. It documents major infrastructure changes such as the 2010 consolidation of rental car facilities to an off-site location 1.5 miles from the terminal and the expansion of the main parking garage from 10,000 to roughly 13,000 spaces. The analysis draws on data from government agencies including the Port of Seattle, WsDOT, Sound Transit, and King County Metro to identify transportation impacts and recommend future tracking measures.
    Tagsnon-aviation transportation, Parking, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-05-29

    Section 13: Socio-Economics — Study of the Current and Ongoing Effects of the Operation of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 2020 report examines the socio-economic conditions in six south King County cities near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, SeaTac, and Tukwila. It analyzes demographic trends such as population growth, age distribution, and ethnic profiles from 1997 to 2018, finding that most study area cities grew more slowly than King County overall, with Burien being a notable exception largely due to a 2010 annexation. The report is part of a broader study assessing how airport operations affect surrounding communities across indicators including income, housing, education, employment, and municipal tax revenues.
    TagsSea-Tac Airport, Socioeconomic Impacts, South King County, Stantec, Statistics, StudiesStudy TopicsEconomics
  • 2020-05-29

    Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study: Appendix A, Section 7 – Mobility

    Stantec mobility analysis (Appendix A, Section 7) from the Department of Commerce 2019 Sea-Tac Airport Communities Impact Study, covering the period 1997–2019. Examines traffic congestion (travel delay times), residential area parking, and pedestrian access around Seattle-Tacoma International Airport across six study area cities. Data sourced from Port of Seattle, WsDOT, Sound Transit, King County Metro,
    Tagsnon-aviation transportation, Parking, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stantec
  • 2020-05-27

    South King County Fund update

    In November 2018, the Port of Seattle Commission set aside $10 million over five years (2019–2023) to benefit near-airport communities in South King County, with funds intended to address airport noise and support environmental health and sustainability projects. In June 2019, the Commission adopted eight guiding principles to govern the fund, emphasizing community input, equity, innovation, and matching funds where possible. This May 2020 presentation to the Highline Forum provided an update on the fund's progress and priorities.
    TagsEnvironmental Justice, Highline Forum, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, South King County Fund
  • 2020-05-27

    Noise programs update

    This May 2020 update from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport outlines the status of its noise abatement and mitigation programs. Citizen noise complaints were averaging 400 per day, while the Noise Abatement Corridor saw 98% compliance and the Late Night Noise Limitation Program recorded an average of 11 exceedances per night in Q1 2020. COVID-19 delayed sound insulation construction projects for single-family homes and condominiums, pushing estimated start dates into 2021.
    CategoriesMeetings TagsFly Quiet, Highline Forum, Noise Abatement Procedures, Noise Mitigation, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2020-05-16

    Re: Burien Airport Committee agenda packet – May 19, 2020

    This document contains correspondence related to Sea-Tac Airport noise and flight operations concerns, including a legal analysis explaining why capping flights would face significant obstacles under the U.S. Commerce Clause and FAA regulations, along with alternative approaches such as Part 161 Studies and state emissions legislation. It also includes a letter from the cities of Burien and Des Moines outlining conditions for rejoining the Sea-Tac Airport Round Table (StART), demanding meeting recordings, reversal of a $10 million design expenditure made without proper environmental review, and responses to outstanding written concerns that had gone unanswered by the Port of Seattle.
    TagsJC Harris, Part 161, Sea-Tac Airport, StART
  • 2020-05-02

    Invoice #1150 and monthly status report – Arlington County consulting services

    This document is an invoice and monthly status report from ABCx2, LLC, a consulting firm based in Senoia, Georgia, billing the County of Arlington, Virginia $10,050.00 for consulting services rendered in April 2020. The work involved nine consultants logging a total of 34.5 hours across tasks such as Smartsheet setup, social media and web strategy planning, and setting up a DCA airspace model in collaboration with a company called Vianair. Note that this document pertains to Arlington County aviation-related consulting and does not appear to be directly related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAir Traffic Control, Sea-Tac Airport, Vianair
  • 2020-04-21

    Letter to FAA Administrator Steve Dickson regarding SeaTac Airport environmental assessment

    In April 2020, U.S. Representatives Pramila Jayapal, Adam Smith, and Rick Larsen wrote to FAA Administrator Steve Dickson urging a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Port of Seattle's Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), arguing that the FAA's planned limited Environmental Assessment was inadequate. The lawmakers contended that a comprehensive cumulative impact review was necessary to properly evaluate decades of growing noise and health impacts on communities surrounding Sea-Tac Airport. They warned that proceeding with a narrower assessment risked legal challenges that could delay critical airport infrastructure projects.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, FAA, NEPA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 … Page 203
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR017792: Ecology Staff Recognition Checks — Sea-Tac Third Runway WQ Certification and NPDES Permit" — , 2000

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V