Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1835)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-26

    EXH AR050017: MSE Wall Performance During Earthquake — Hart Crowser Memorandum to Port Of Seattle

    Hart Crowser memorandum (J-4978-19) from Michael Bailey, P.E., to Port Of Seattle attn. Michael J. Cheyne, CC HNTB attn. Jim Thomson, P.E., dated March 26, 2001, summarizing MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall performance during the February 28 Nisqually earthquake. Discusses two MSE walls identified by Helsell Fetterman (Eglick & Stock 3/20/01) and GeoSyntec (3/15/01) as
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-26

    EXH AR049975: Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance and Photo Documentation — STIA Third Runway Project

    Memorandum from Michael Bailey, P.E., Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E., HNTB Corporation, dated March 26, 2001, documenting post-earthquake reconnaissance at the Sea-Tac Airport (STIA) Third Runway Project site (project J-4978-06) following the February 28, 2001, Nisqually earthquake. Two reconnaissance visits on March 1 and March 2, 2001 by Hart Crowser engineers Doug Lindquist
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-21

    EXH AR031728: Port Of Seattle Letter to Ecology Transmitting Synthetic Minor Permit and PSCAA Order for Sea-Tac Airport Air Emissions

    Letter dated March 21, 2001 from Maggie Corbin, Sr. Environmental Program Manager, Port Of Seattle Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, to Ann Kenny at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting a synthetic minor permit. Background: Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) issued Order dated September 21, 1999 (Construction No. 7777, Registration No. 21408) limiting
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, PSCAA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 12
  • 2001-03-21

    EXH 445: Letter to Ecology Transmitting Synthetic Minor Permit and PSCAA Order No. 7777 STIA Air Emissions

    In September 1999, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency issued an order limiting facility-wide air emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport to less than 99 tons each per any 12-month period. The Port of Seattle is required to monitor fuel usage, calculate monthly emissions using specified factors, and maintain rolling records for at least five years. A March 2001 letter from the Port's Environmental Program Manager confirms emissions were well within limits, with nitrogen oxides typically running 15–17 tons and both carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide at 10 tons or less over the previous 12-month period.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, PSCAA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 09
  • 2001-03-15

    EXH 403: GeoSyntec Letter to Army Corps & WA Ecology — Nisqually Earthquake Implications STIA Third Runway MSE Wall & Embankment Fill

    Following the Nisqually earthquake of February 28, 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants wrote to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology raising serious concerns about the seismic safety of the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter highlighted that the earthquake caused damage to mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls and widespread liquefaction despite being only a moderate event, reinforcing earlier warnings about flaws in the project's seismic design criteria and ground motion analysis. GeoSyntec argued that the airport's role as a regional emergency lifeline demands higher safety standards than those applied to ordinary residential structures.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-03-14

    Beware – The Great Wall of Sea-Tac and Coalition appeals permit for 3rd runway

    Two 2001 Seattle Post-Intelligencer articles raise safety and environmental concerns about SeaTac Airport's proposed third runway. The first warns that a planned 15-story, 1,450-foot retaining wall built on weak, earthquake-prone soils could catastrophically fail in a seismic event, threatening wetlands and salmon-bearing streams. The second reveals that state officials approved a key water-quality permit for the runway without following their own attorney's advice to secure a water right, prompting the Airport Communities Coalition to appeal the permit and allege political pressure was driving the project forward.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Earthquake, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderSierra Club
  • 2001-03-09

    EXH 384: Email Beaver to Bailey — 3R Embankment Subgrade Improvement Zones HC Rational

    This internal engineering memo from Jamie Beaver to Mike Bailey, dated March 9, 2001, outlines the process used to determine subgrade improvement zones for a 3R embankment stability project. The analysis focused on liquefaction risks, using post-liquefaction undrained residual shear strength (PLURSS) values derived from seismic reanalysis, ultimately recommending improvement zone widths of 100–120 feet depending on location. The memo notes that factors of safety for the liquefaction and pseudo-static cases generally ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 across various zones.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-03-06

    EXH AR049967: Addendum to STIA North Electric Service Upgrade Determination of Non-Significance

    Port of Seattle SEPA addendum (POS SEPA No. 01-05, AR 049967) dated March 6, 2001, for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport North Electric Service Upgrade project. Documents a revised proposal for the North Main Service Point site location and 12.5 kV cable route connecting to the Bow Lake Substation via International Boulevard near South 176th Street.
    TagsACC, Construction, Environmental Review, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPAFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-05

    EXH AR049946: Revised Methods and Results of Liquefaction Analyses, Third Runway Embankment, Sea-Tac, Washington

    Draft memorandum dated March 5, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist E.I.T., Barry Chen PhD P.E., and Michael Bailey P.E. of Hart Crowser Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. of HNTB, project J-4978-30. Presents revised methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the SeaTac Third Runway embankment, based on revised probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and one-dimensional site
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR050023: Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package, Borrow Areas 3 and 4, Sea-Tac International Airport

    Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package for Borrow Areas 3 and 4 at Sea-Tac International Airport, City of SeaTac, Washington. Prepared by Hart Crowser for Port Of Seattle for presentation to the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), March 1, 2001, project J-4978-62. Document covers site preparation activities, mining practices, operating plan, conceptual reclamation plan, revegetation
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 … Page 184
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "City of Burien Airport Impact Studies Selection Process Interview Notes, Nov. 30, 1995" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V