Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1835)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-22

    Aerial View of Public Storage Facility, Apartments, and Freeway in South King County

    Aerial photograph showing a suburban landscape with a large self-storage facility bearing orange-and-white unit doors (consistent with Public Storage branding), adjacent apartment complexes, a used car lot, and a multi-lane freeway. The density of conifers, road layout, and general development pattern are consistent with the greater Sea-Tac/South King County, Washington area.
    TagsKing County, Land Use, Sea-Tac Airport, South King CountyFolderWatershed Aerial Photos
  • 2001-06-22

    Aerial Photograph — Lora Lake Area, June 22, 2001

    Tagsaircraft, Sea-Tac AirportFolderWatershed Aerial Photos
  • 2001-06-22

    Sea-Tac Airport Runway and Stormwater Pond Construction with Adjacent Industrial Facilities

    Aerial photograph showing a runway and taxiway system in the upper portion of the frame, with a retention or stormwater pond under apparent construction or remediation in the mid-ground. The foreground shows warehouse and distribution facilities with truck loading areas, parking lots, and a multi-story office building, consistent with an airport-adjacent industrial zone.
    TagsConstruction, Runways, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderWatershed Aerial Photos
  • 2001-06-13

    EXH AR017498: Email on Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — MTCA Requirements for Third Runway

    Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick (cc: Craig E. Thompson, Curtis A. Dahlgren, Tim Nord), dated June 13, 2001, regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. References June 11 discussion between Craig Thompson and Pete Kmet of HQ/TCP, who recommended MTCA (Model
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-07

    EXH AR017497: Email Chain — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification, Sea-Tac Master Plan Improvements

    Email chain among Craig Thompson, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung Yee, Peter Kmet, Ann Kenny, and Ching-Pi Wang of Ecology NWRO Water Quality Program regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the Sea-Tac Master Plan Improvements project. Discusses review of previous clean fill draft language, response to Pete Kmet’s comments and
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-05

    Exhibit 205: Tom Luster Notes on Call with Ann Kenny re 401/Agreed Order/Governor’s Certification Letter

    In a June 2001 internal memo, Tom Luster notes a call from Ann Kenny of the Washington Department of Ecology regarding the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Kenny indicated that Ecology intended to separate the Section 401 water quality certification from the Agreed Order, planning a new study to examine possible contamination pathways from the Airport Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA) to the third runway site. Luster noted that if called upon for an affidavit, his testimony would reflect his understanding of how the key documents were connected during his time as project reviewer.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR050568: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements, Chinook Salmon ESA Section 7 Consultation and Essential Fish Habitat

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region (Seattle, WA) to Lowell H. Johnson, FAA Airport Division Manager, concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21
  • 2001-05-30

    EXH AR017714: Email and Redline Revisions to Preferential Flowpath Technical Memorandum — Third Runway Construction

    Email from Ching-Pi Wang (Port Of Seattle) to Paul Agid, cc Roger Nye, dated May 30, 2001, transmitting redline edits to the May 8th draft of the preferential ground-water flowpath technical memorandum related to construction of the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Attached redlined memorandum (From Port to Ecology, May 30, 2001) addresses preferential flowpaths
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR019295: Biological Opinion — FWS Sec 7 Consultation STIA Master Plan Update (Bull Trout, Bald Eagle, Marbled Murrelet)

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a biological opinion in May 2001 evaluating the potential effects of proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on three protected species: bull trout, bald eagle, and marbled murrelet. The review was conducted under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration, which had determined the project was 'not likely to adversely affect' any of the three species. The opinion covers planned airport development in the cities of SeaTac and Des Moines, along with off-site wetland mitigation near the Green River in Auburn, Washington.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR050478: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion — Master Plan Update Improvements, Sea-Tac Airport

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biological opinion (FWS Reference #1-3-00-F-1420) transmitted to Lowell H. Johnson of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding effects of the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements (MPUI) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in King County, Washington on threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 … Page 184
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Pilot program for sound insulation repair and replacement passes in Defense bill" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V