Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH 458: Review Comments Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Dec 2001

    This February 2002 draft document from King County Department of Natural Resources presents technical review comments on the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review identifies several deficiencies in the hydrologic modeling for Walker Creek and Miller Creek, including inconsistencies in impervious area calculations, questionable vault-filling timelines, and concerns about the accuracy of observed streamflow data used for calibration. King County recommends additional refinements before approving the revised impact numbers, and suggests that Ecology and the Port establish a formal compliance oversight process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 14
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR015139: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Peter Willing on Behalf of ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Willing holds MS and PhD from Cornell University Department of Natural Resources, specializing in land use and water quality of lakes
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    Exhibit 719: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Monitoring Report — Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport, Permit WA-002465-1, December 2001

    NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) filed by Port Of Seattle for Sea-Tac Airport under permit WA-002465-1, discharge number 001, monitoring period December 1–31, 2001. Parameters reported include flow (max 4,500–4,800 gpm), pH, oil and grease, TSS, BOD5, total glycols, TPH, fecal coliform, priority pollutants, and SCAN results. Signed by Michael D. Feldman, Director of Aviation
    TagsACC, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR003520: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony with Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed February 22, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery by special messenger of ACC’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witnesses Amanda Azous, Dyanne Sheldon, John Strand, Peter Willing, Thomas Luster,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony submitted to the Environmental Hearings Office on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) by Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Binder #2 of 4 in a four-binder set. Index references Binder #1
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of William Rozeboom, Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony of William Rozeboom P.E., Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002, Binder #3 of 4. Document received by Environmental Hearings Office. The index references testimony of
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB No. 01-160: ACC Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Peter Willing and Greg Wingard, Binder 4 of 4

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing and Greg Wingard submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, filed February 22, 2002 with the Environmental Hearings Office. Binder 4 of 4 in a four-binder set. The full index (Binder 1)
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 07
  • 2002-02-21

    EXH AR003556: ACC Exhibit List — PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) exhibit list filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, on February 21, 2002, pursuant to the Board’s October 30, 2001, Pre-Hearing Order and January 22, 2002, Discovery Order. Lists exhibits including Dept. of Ecology 401 Certification Order No. 1996-4-02325 (dated September 21, 2001 and August 10,
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-20

    EXH AR003522: Port Of Seattle Witness and Exhibit List — PCHB 01-160 (ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Port Of Seattle respondent witness and exhibit list filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 18 potential witnesses including Paul Agid (Aviation Project Management Group), James C. Kelley Ph.D. and Donald E. Weitkamp Ph.D. and Paul S.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 02

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Airliners.Net" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V