Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2410)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 247: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to Army Corps — STIA Third Runway Low Flow Mitigation Deficiencies

    A November 2001 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious technical objections to the Port of Seattle's proposed plan to manage low streamflow impacts from SeaTac Airport's third runway construction on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. The letter argues that the Port's analysis contains critical flaws, including an incorrect assumption that virtually all runway runoff infiltrates into adjacent grassed filter strips, and that the use of hourly rather than shorter time intervals in hydrological modeling causes stream impacts to be underestimated and mitigation storage facilities to be undersized. The consultants also express concern that the Port was not adequately addressing outstanding public comments or certification requirements set by regulatory agencies such as the Washington Department of Ecology.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-11-26

    PCHB 01-160: Order on Motion to Reconsider Motion to Strike — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) order in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. On reconsideration of the October 10, 2001 order granting Ecology’s motion to strike, the Board addresses inadvertent disclosure of an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by Ecology NW Regional Director Ray
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR005903: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Supplement PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to supplement the record in PCHB Case No. 01-160, filed November 26, 2001. Port argues ACC’s hearsay emails and Keith Smith letter regarding revisions to the Low Streamflow Analysis do not warrant supplementing the record on the motion to stay. Document addresses HSPF groundwater model
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR052417: Third Runway Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan — 401 Certification Condition E.3

    Port Of Seattle letter dated November 16, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs, to Ann Kenny at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting the Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan in satisfaction of § 401 Water Quality Certification Order #1998-4-02325, Condition E.3. The plan, AR 052417–052419, covers
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 22
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR006110: ACC’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Its Motion for Stay (PCHB No. 01-160)

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) seeking to supplement the evidentiary record on its motion for stay of the Section 401 Certification issued by Ecology on September 21, 2001, for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport. Documents obtained via public records request to Ecology on
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR006114: Declaration of Andrea Grad in Support of ACC’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Its Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Andrea Grad, paralegal at Helsell Fetterman LLP representing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed November 16, 2001, in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Describes Public Disclosure Act request submitted November 5, 2001 to Ecology’s Northwest Regional Office (NWRO), resulting in receipt of 651 pages of documents. Attaches Exhibits A-D: (A) October 24, 2001 letter from
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR006166: Port Of Seattle Preliminary List of Witnesses and Exhibits, PCHB 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Port Of Seattle’s preliminary list of potential witnesses and exhibits filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 21 potential witnesses including Paul Agid (Port of Seattle Environmental), Barry R. Christopher Ph.D. PE (Roswell GA), James C. Kelley Ph.D. and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-16

    EXH AR025067: Letter to Ecology Submitting Third Runway Embankment Seepage Groundwater Monitoring Plan

    In November 2001, the Port of Seattle submitted a Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan to the Washington Department of Ecology as required by a § 401 Water Quality Certification order. The plan was designed to detect any impacts of the runway fill embankment on nearby receiving waters and groundwater, both during and after fill placement. The Port requested written approval of the plan from the Department of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR006137: ACC Updated Preliminary List of Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) updated preliminary list of exhibits filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case No. 01-160, ACC v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Lists 29 exhibits including 401 Certifications, depositions, resumes and declarations of Amanda Azous and Dyanne Sheldon, letters from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Corps
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR021065: ACC Updated Preliminary Witness List — PCHB Nos. 01-133 & 01-150

    This November 2001 legal filing lists the witnesses that the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) planned to call at a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The witness list includes personnel from the Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, outside consultants such as Parametrix and Shannon & Wilson, and ACC's own expert witnesses covering environmental, hydraulic, and biological topics. The case, filed under PCHB Nos. 01-133 and 01-150, centered on a water quality certification related to Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 … Page 241
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 09 22 rm packet pdf

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of

    [...]
  • Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
    City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,
    Highline forum agenda final 23sept2026 pdf

    Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Toshiko Hasegawa Re-election ad" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V