TagPort Of Seattle(2410)

Email chain dated October 23, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, forwarding a message from Beth Clark, discussing which fill materials are subject to Condition E of the 401 water quality certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle proposes that topsoil, utility backfill, and base course

Email chain dated October 23, 2001 between Ann Kenny, Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Tim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle proposes that

This document contains an email chain from October 2001 coordinating a technical meeting among Port of Seattle staff and consultants to discuss low flow modeling issues at Sea-Tac Airport. The meeting, held on October 30, 2001 at Floyd Snider McCarthy's Seattle office, was scheduled to cover a low flow modeling error, revised modeling results and their effects on low flow reserve vaults, and potential additional modeling changes suggested by a Norm Crawford review. Key participants included Port of Seattle Water Resources Manager Keith Smith, consultant Kate Snider, and several other technical staff and engineers.

Email chain dated October 19, 2001 among Kathryn Snider (Floyd Snider McCarthy, Inc.), Kelly Whiting (Metro King County), Ann Kenny, Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle Water Resources Manager), and David Masters regarding a proposed Low Flow Meeting scheduled for October 30, 2001 at Kate Snider’s office (8:30–11:30 AM). Kelly Whiting requests a meeting agenda or

Declaration by Amanda Azous (wetland expert) filed October 18, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, concerning Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Azous reviews additional pages submitted by Ecology on October 15 as late additions

In October 2001, the Port of Seattle issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a proposed FAA Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facility at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The project involved leasing a 19-acre site to the FAA for construction of a new 50,000-square-foot, two-story building to replace the existing TRACON located in the airport's main terminal, with the facility tracking all aircraft within 60 miles of Sea-Tac. The Port concluded that the project would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, meaning a full Environmental Impact Statement was not required.

Respondent Port Of Seattle’s preliminary list of issues, witnesses, and exhibits filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Covers §401 Clean Water Act certification for STIA projects, issues including water quality standards, dam safety permits, Coastal Zone Management Act, SEPA

Draft Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed appeal on August 23, 2001 of a section 401 Clean Water Act certification and order under RCW chapter 90.48 issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued amended

Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed for review of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and RCW chapter 90.48 order issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued an amended 401 Certification on September

Certificate of Service filed October 12, 2001 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery of ACC’s Opposition To Ecology’s Motion To Strike Documents, Motion To Rescind Ex Parte Order And For Reconsideration By Full Board, And Request For Hearing