Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2410)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR052151: Memorandum on Wetland Hydrology and the Third Runway Embankment Fill

    Memorandum dated October 30, 2001 from Michael Kenrick of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson of HNTB, CC Elizabeth Leavitt of Port Of Seattle, project number 4978-06. Addresses wetland hydrology impacts of Third Runway Embankment Fill construction at Sea-Tac Airport, covering depression wetlands, slope wetlands, and riparian wetlands. References Miller Creek and Walker Creek baseflow,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Elizabeth Leavitt, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 22
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR022925: 401 Permit Post-Issuance Clarification STIA Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis

    Meeting notes from an October 30, 2001 technical session addressing errors discovered in the low streamflow modeling for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Consultants identified six modeling errors, including a conversion factor mistake that caused embankment flow contributions to be understated by a factor of 24, along with incorrect input files and improper groundwater routing. Representatives from the Port of Seattle, King County, the Department of Ecology, and the Army Corps of Engineers agreed on corrective revisions to be incorporated into a revised Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal required under the 401 Permit.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH 307: Draft Meeting Notes – Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway, Oct 30, 2001

    These draft meeting notes from October 30, 2001 document a technical review session in which Port of Seattle consultants disclosed and explained several errors found in the low streamflow modeling for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. The key errors included a 1/24th magnitude conversion factor mistake in embankment fill data input, incorrect input files used for embankment modeling, and an overlap in which approximately 8 acres of the Walker Creek embankment appeared to be counted in both the Hydrus embankment model and the HSPF stream model. The meeting outlined corrective steps to be taken by the Port's consulting team to fix these errors before finalizing the revised Low Streamflow Analysis required under 401 Permit conditions.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-10-29

    EXH AR006279: Port Of Seattle’s Submittal of Record References Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay, PCHB 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s submittal of record references in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle), filed October 29, 2001, opposing ACC’s motion for stay. Lists declarations from James C. Kelley Ph.D., Katie Walter, Erik Stockdale, Paul S. Fendt, Joseph Brascher, Donald Weitkamp Ph.D., Ann Kenny, Edward O’Brien,
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-26

    EXH AR026216: Parametrix to US Army Corps Transmittal — STIA MPU Natural Resource Mitigation Responses

    A October 26, 2001 transmittal from Parametrix, Inc. to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) provides responses to the ACOE's request for additional information regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update (MPU) Natural Resource Mitigation project. The package includes maps and aerial photographs identifying wetland areas and acreages within Borrow Area 1, submitted on behalf of the Port of Seattle.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Elizabeth Leavitt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR006328: ACC Statement of Supplemental Authorities in Reply on ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) filing in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, submitting supplemental authorities in reply to ACC’s Motion for Reconsideration and responding to Ecology’s October 22, 2001 submission. Argues AAG statements on a ‘purely legal question’ regarding water rights for the low flow plan fall outside attorney-client
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-24

    EXH AR026132: Letter to Ecology Requesting Extension Low Streamflow Analysis & Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    In this October 24, 2001 letter, the Port of Seattle notified the Washington Department of Ecology of a mathematical error discovered in hydrological modeling software used to assess the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan's impacts on Miller and Walker Creeks. The error caused stream flow impacts to be overestimated at 1/24th of their actual value, meaning required mitigation facilities could be smaller than originally planned. As a result, the Port requested an extension of the Low Streamflow Analysis submittal deadline from November 5 to November 21, 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-23

    PCHB Doc 6357: Ecology’s Reply to ACC’s Opposition to Ecology’s Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents

    Washington State Department of Ecology reply brief filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) opposing Airport Communities Coalition’s (ACC) arguments against Ecology’s motion to strike attorney-client privileged documents. Ecology argues the privilege is not ‘at issue’ under Pappas v. Holloway (114 Wn.2d 198) and Hearn v. Rhay (68 F.R.D. 574), and that
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2135: Port Of Seattle Fill Criteria — Processed Materials Specifications for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 among Ann Kenny (Ecology), Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Raymond Hellwig, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young (ATG), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Jim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 14

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 … Page 241
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 09 22 rm packet pdf

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of

    [...]
  • Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
    City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,
    Highline forum agenda final 23sept2026 pdf

    Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Noise Exposure Map NEM Future 1996 pg 210 from 1993 Part 150 Study" — , 1993

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V