Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
    • Financials
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
        • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(75)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-05-20

    North Seatac Park: Cause For Celebration — Long-Awaited Ballfields Dedicated

    Marc Stiles, Christy True Seattle Times South Bureau SEATAC – After 18 years of off-again, on-again planning, North SeaTac Park opened last week with a celebration that included baseball, apple pie and rave reviews. The dedication ceremony for the $5 million first phase of the park – the second-largest in King County after Marymoor Park
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsCity Of SeaTac, King County, North Sea-Tac Park, Seattle Times
  • 1997-11-01

    Des Moines Creek Basin Plan November 1997

    CategoriesHistory TagsCity Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, King County, Land Use, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • Moscow-Pullman Daily News July, 11 1996: Activists propose new ‘Puget Sound County’

    SEATTLE - Cedar Caunt;y. Casade County. Enumclaw County. Sll)l1coml&h County. Pioneer Counl)'. WhlLehorse Counl)'. A lla ofu............rul proposals ror now countJea in Wuhington atal.c migltt well cxoood lhe 89 counties now in eJ<Jate-. but what some &OUth KinJz County rutdenta ltove in mind Ia diffon>nL A aunJ>4lilln boi"!18Jinounced today would C..rve l'uget Sound County out or tlle Kin& County, from the wburt>e a:ound SeattJe. 'lllooma lutemational AiJ1>ort to the Plcrco Count;y line. 'The people or South King County have !tad It up to here with theM powo"' that bo: oaid Peter'Townsend, a Federal Way accountant and member of the Puget Sound County Steerlng Committee. Bad<en aoy thoro would bo lliO.OOO to 200.000 res!denl4. in the now county. whlc:h would con·alit or Fedora! WD¥• Burien, 0.. Molnea. Normanely Park, &aThe. 1\akwUa and a few unincorporated areu. lt'a tho n .. t eampoign, at lout In r.cent memory, to fonn a r>ew counl)l In a largely urban·l%ed uta. The last time a new C>lll1\y wu H\ablilhorl in WasltingtDn wu In 19 U.. wlten Paad OreUle County wu fanned out or the eutorn HCti.on or Stevena Coun11- In the 1 .. 1 throo docadoa thoro ltove been unsuc:caarw ltlemptl to form new eountlea only in predomiNlDtly rural ........ .-Uy oot or .u. gruntlemont with eounty gov·ommenta dominated by urban CO DC*~ FaUed aeceaalon movcmentl Include proposala for Cedar Co~ ln eD.Jtem King Coun~;y; Co 1 County in eastern King and Piorco• eounties; Freedom, Slcyl«>mlsh and Whlteltonoo counlleo in SDObolnlsb County; Plonttr County In northom WltaiCOm Caun\1- and Olympic Count;y In western C!&lam 8Jid Jofl"er1011 counlles. Some or the mollvatloa for Pupt Sound County is similar.
    CategoriesHistory TagsAssociated Press, King County, Moscow Pullman Daily News, Peter Townsend, Puget Sound County, Secession
  • 1984-04-16

    Executive Proposed General Development Guide

    Letter from King County Executive Randy Revelle to Council Chairman Gary Grant presenting the Executive Proposed General Development Guide for review and approval. King County Council Motion 4152. The letter outlines the comprehensive land use plan’s principles for managing growth and development in King County, emphasizing protection of natural features, encouraging growth in existing cities,
    TagsKing County, King County Council, Land Use
  • 1983-06-01

    League of Women Voters of King County South Calendar – June 1983

    Newsletter from the League of Women Voters of King County South containing calendar of events for June 1983, including meetings with World Bank representative, unit luncheons and picnics, and a public forum on coal mining. Also includes board meeting minutes from April 12, 1983 and a report on the 1983 LWV State Convention.
    CategoriesOrganizations TagsKing County, League of Women Voters, Parks
  • Westside Hilltop v. King County

    Westside Hilltop v. King County 96 Wn.2d 171 (1981) 634 P.2d 862 WESTSIDE HILLTOP SURVIVAL COMMITTEE, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents. No. 46982-2. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. October 8, 1981. *172 Roger M. Leed and Jeffrey M. Eustis, for appellants. Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Susan R. Agid,
    CategoriesFrom The Web, History TagsAppearance of Fairness Doctrine, Boeing, HCP, Highline Community, King County, King County Council, Washington State Supreme Court, Westside Hilltop Survival Committee
  • King County Code Violation Complaint Response Letter

    Letter from King County Department of Planning and Community Development to Mrs. Virginia Dana acknowledging receipt of her complaint and assigning case number 81-456. The letter explains the complaint processing procedure including property ownership research, owner contact, and follow-up actions to bring property into code compliance.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsKing County
  • Regional Airport System Plan Draft Review Letter

    Letter from Puget Sound Council of Governments requesting public comment on the draft Regional Airport System Plan 1980-2000, which includes recommendations for airport expansion and construction of a new industrial/commuter airport in the King-Snohomish service area. Comments were to be reviewed by the King Subregional Council in March 1981.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAirport, History, King County, PSRC
  • 1980-10-21

    Conditional Use Permit Report and Decision – Glacier High School File No. 80-75-C

    King County Zoning Adjustor report and decision approving a conditional use permit for a former high school facility to be used as a private school, with conditions for parking lot improvements and community recreation facility access. The permit was ordered on November 25, 1980, and transmitted to various parties including James C. Scott and Dr.
    Tags80-75-C, Highline Schools, King County, Land Use
  • 1980-07-18

    King County Code Violation complaint response Highline Schools closures

    Official response letter from King County Department of Planning and Community Development to Virginia E. Dana regarding her complaint on Motion 80-75-C, assigned case numbers 80-547 and 80-549. The letter outlines the complaint processing procedure including property ownership research, owner notification, and follow-up actions to ensure code compliance. Glendale Junior High 1201 S 104th St,
    Tags80-75-C, Highline Schools, King County, Land Use, letter

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Des Moines City Council – SAMP Update
    Add to CalendarMThursday Jun 4: 5:00pm
    21630 11th Ave S,
    Item report 1 pdf

    Purpose and Recommendation To provide the Council with an update on the status of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) environmental review. Background Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Approval On September 26, 2025, the FAA completed their National Environmental Policy Act review and approved a Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision

    [...]
  • SAMP/SEPA Draft EIS Town Hall SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Jun 22, 6:00pm - 8:00pm
    2450 S 142nd St SeaTac, WA 98168
    SAMP logo t

    The Port of Seattle is sponsoring four open houses to answer your questions about the SAMP/SEPA Draft EIS. There will be a reporter to take your comments in-person. Monday, June 22: 6–8pm Glacier Middle School Entrance lobby/commons 2450 S 142nd St SeaTac, WA 98168

    [...]
  • SAMP/SEPA Draft EIS Town Hall Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Jun 23, 6:00pm - 8:00pm
    22450 19th Ave S
    SAMP logo t

    The Port of Seattle is sponsoring four open houses to answer your questions about the SAMP/SEPA Draft EIS. There will be a reporter to take your comments in-person. Tuesday, June 23: 6–8pm Mount Rainier High School Cafeteria space 22450 19th Ave S Des Moines, WA 98198

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

A report examining the barriers to implementing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in Massachusetts, authored by Neil Rasmussen and Chuck Collins from the Institute for Policy Studies. The report analyzes challenges and obstacles facing SAF adoption in the state.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "A Citizen’s Guide to NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard" — , 2021

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
V V