Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
    • Financials
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
        • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Regular Events
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI
STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(63)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2013-11-25

    Lane v. Port of Seattle BNSF GNP RLY (2013)

    Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. Arthur LANE; John Allerton, and Kenneth Gorohoff, Appellants, v. PORT OF SEATTLE; King County; BNSF Railway Company; GNP RLY, Inc.; and City of Redmond, Respondents. No. 69157–1–I. Decided: November 25, 2013 David Florian Jurca, Bradley H. Bagshaw, Helsell Fetterman LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellants. Lori Marie Bemis, McGavick
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsGift of Public Funds, King County, Port Of Seattle
  • King County Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2008 Appendix B

    TagsGreenhouse gases, King County, pollution
  • 2008-10-31

    Economy delays BNSF rail-line sale to Port of Seattle

    A troubled municipal-bond market has delayed the Port of Seattle’s $107 million purchase of BNSF Railway’s Snohomish-to-Renton rail line, but the Port has chosen a possible excursion-train operator. By Keith Ervin BNSF Railway’s sale of its 42-mile Renton-to-Snohomish rail line to the Port of Seattle won’t close before the first quarter of 2009. Port officials,
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsKing County, Port Of Seattle, Seattle Times
  • 2006-02-27

    PSRC General Chronology (updated 02/27/06)

    General Chronology: Regional Commercial Airport Capacity Decisions in the Central Puget Sound Region Updated February 27, 2006 2006 WSDOT begins work on the Long-Term Air Transportation Capacity Study (LATS). 2005 New Central Terminal and Pacific Marketplace open at Sea-Tac Airport. Port of Seattle Fly Quiet Committee completes its recommendations and Port of Seattle begins implementing
    TagsAlaska Airlines, Boeing Field, KCIA, King County, King County International Airport, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Southwest Airlines, Third Runway, Timeline
  • 2004-04-19

    Resolution No. 3523 – Des Moines Creek Basin Plan Interlocal Agreement V2

    A Port of Seattle resolution authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to execute version two of an Interlocal Agreement with the Cities of Des Moines and SeaTac, Washington State Department of Transportation and King County to fund, construct, operate and maintain capital projects necessary to implement the Des Moines Creek Basin Plan. The projects include construction
    TagsCity Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Interlocal Agreement, King County, Port Of Seattle, WSDOT
  • 1998-05-20

    North Seatac Park: Cause For Celebration — Long-Awaited Ballfields Dedicated

    Marc Stiles, Christy True Seattle Times South Bureau SEATAC – After 18 years of off-again, on-again planning, North SeaTac Park opened last week with a celebration that included baseball, apple pie and rave reviews. The dedication ceremony for the $5 million first phase of the park – the second-largest in King County after Marymoor Park
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsCity Of SeaTac, King County, North Sea-Tac Park, Seattle Times
  • 1997-11-01

    Des Moines Creek Basin Plan November 1997

    CategoriesHistory TagsCity Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, King County, Land Use, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • Moscow-Pullman Daily News July, 11 1996: Activists propose new ‘Puget Sound County’

    SEATTLE - Cedar Caunt;y. Casade County. Enumclaw County. Sll)l1coml&h County. Pioneer Counl)'. WhlLehorse Counl)'. A lla ofu............rul proposals ror now countJea in Wuhington atal.c migltt well cxoood lhe 89 counties now in eJ<Jate-. but what some &OUth KinJz County rutdenta ltove in mind Ia diffon>nL A aunJ>4lilln boi"!18Jinounced today would C..rve l'uget Sound County out or tlle Kin& County, from the wburt>e a:ound SeattJe. 'lllooma lutemational AiJ1>ort to the Plcrco Count;y line. 'The people or South King County have !tad It up to here with theM powo"' that bo: oaid Peter'Townsend, a Federal Way accountant and member of the Puget Sound County Steerlng Committee. Bad<en aoy thoro would bo lliO.OOO to 200.000 res!denl4. in the now county. whlc:h would con·alit or Fedora! WD¥• Burien, 0.. Molnea. Normanely Park, &aThe. 1\akwUa and a few unincorporated areu. lt'a tho n .. t eampoign, at lout In r.cent memory, to fonn a r>ew counl)l In a largely urban·l%ed uta. The last time a new C>lll1\y wu H\ablilhorl in WasltingtDn wu In 19 U.. wlten Paad OreUle County wu fanned out or the eutorn HCti.on or Stevena Coun11- In the 1 .. 1 throo docadoa thoro ltove been unsuc:caarw ltlemptl to form new eountlea only in predomiNlDtly rural ........ .-Uy oot or .u. gruntlemont with eounty gov·ommenta dominated by urban CO DC*~ FaUed aeceaalon movcmentl Include proposala for Cedar Co~ ln eD.Jtem King Coun~;y; Co 1 County in eastern King and Piorco• eounties; Freedom, Slcyl«>mlsh and Whlteltonoo counlleo in SDObolnlsb County; Plonttr County In northom WltaiCOm Caun\1- and Olympic Count;y In western C!&lam 8Jid Jofl"er1011 counlles. Some or the mollvatloa for Pupt Sound County is similar.
    CategoriesHistory TagsAssociated Press, King County, Moscow Pullman Daily News, Peter Townsend, Puget Sound County, Secession
  • North SeaTac Park Master Plan 1992 (draft)

    CategoriesKey Documents TagsCity Of SeaTac, Jones & Jones, King County, Master Plan, North Sea-Tac Park
  • 1984-04-16

    Executive Proposed General Development Guide

    Letter from King County Executive Randy Revelle to Council Chairman Gary Grant presenting the Executive Proposed General Development Guide for review and approval. King County Council Motion 4152. The letter outlines the comprehensive land use plan’s principles for managing growth and development in King County, emphasizing protection of natural features, encouraging growth in existing cities,
    TagsKing County, King County Council, Land Use

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 … Page 7 Next page
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting April 28, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Apr 28: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 04 28 RM Packet Pdf 1

    # New Business Items
    **Order No. 2026-04:** Directs Executive Director to explore a program facilitating secure area access for union business requirements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

    **Resolution No. 3848:** Approves Port's participation in City of Bellevue's Tax Increment Area.

    **Fishermen's Terminal C-15 Building Improvements:** Authorization for Executive Director to approve funding to advertise and execute a major public works construction contract for project completion.

    [...]
  • StART (SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table) Meeting
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Apr 29, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom Webinar
    Start Meetingagenda 2026429 Pdf 1

    - **SAMP Environmental Review**: Detailed comparison between SEPA Environmental Impact Statement and NEPA Environmental Assessment processes for Near-Term Projects
    - **Community Roundtable Updates**: Progress report on airport stakeholder engagement initiatives
    - **Next Steps**: Implementation timeline for environmental review findings

    **Notable Action Item:**
    Public comment period opened for stakeholder input on airport development plans.

    [...]
  • KCIA Vision 2045 Open House
    Add to CalendarMThursday May 14, 5:30pm - 7:30pm
    KCIA Flight Service Station, 6526 Ellis Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108
    Kcia Boeing Field Beautyshotkcia

    King County International Airport-Boeing Field is at a pivotal moment, developing comprehensive plans that will determine its operations through 2045. The airport's Vision 2045 Airport Plan and Part 150 Study represent crucial strategic initiatives to balance safe, efficient operations with evolving aviation demands and community needs.

    Join airport officials on Thursday, May 14 (5:30-7:30 p.m.) at the KCIA Flight Service Station to discover the preferred alternative for the airport's future development. This isn't just another planning meeting—it's your opportunity to understand how proposed projects and improvements will directly impact aviation services, local operations, and surrounding communities.

    The Vision 2045 plan incorporates extensive stakeholder feedback and addresses critical infrastructure needs for future demand. Meanwhile, the Part 150 Study focuses on noise compatibility programs, ensuring community concerns remain central to planning decisions.

    With environmental analysis nearing completion and submissions to King County Council and the FAA approaching, this open house offers essential insights into decisions that will shape regional aviation for decades.

    Visit KCIAplanning.com for updates.

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

This is the first study to combine a one-year mobile monitoring campaign with PMF (Positive Matrix Factorization) analysis to simultaneously estimate source-specific air pollution exposures and emission factors of different vehicle types. This methodology can be extended to other metropolitan areas.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky

    "SeaTac 2018 ILA Thoughts and Insight by Peter Kwon" — , 2017

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
V V