Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(456)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1980-08-01

    Highline Community Plan: Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

    This August 1980 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement from King County's Division of Planning outlines proposed zoning changes for the Highline Community Plan, covering areas surrounding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport including White Center, Burien, and nearby neighborhoods. The document maps land proposed for rezoning across multiple subareas, with changes including downzones to single-family residential, conversions to multi-family or mixed use, and designations of land for potential future rezones. It serves as a planning tool to guide land use decisions in communities directly affected by airport noise and related impacts.
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, Highline Community Plan, King County, Land Use, SEPA
  • 1980-07-18

    Case 80-75-C: King County Department of Planning and Community Development Letter to Virginia E. Dana Regarding Complaint Cases 80-547, 80-548, and 80-549

    A July 1980 letter from King County's Building and Land Development division acknowledges a complaint filed by Virginia E. Dana, assigning it case numbers 80-547, 80-548, and 80-549, and outlines the county's process for investigating code violations. The letter explains that resolving complaints may involve researching property ownership, contacting the owner, and conducting field inspections for serious hazards. A related newspaper article covers conditional use permit hearings for tenants of closed Highline School District schools, noting that the county had recently discovered many such tenants lacked required permits.
    Tags80-75-C, community development, Highline Schools, King County, Land Use, letter, Virginia Dana
  • King county planning 1980 03 04 highline communities plan area zoning transmittal pdf
    1980-03-04

    Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning: Transmittal Letter from King County Planning Division

    Letter dated March 4, 1980 from Karen Rahm, Manager of the King County Planning Division, to recipients of the Highline Community Plan Proposed Area Zoning. Transmits a copy of the Proposed Highline Area Zoning, designed to implement the land use portion of the Highline Communities Plan adopted in 1977. Notes that a supplemental draft Environmental
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, NEPA
  • 1980-03-04

    Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning: Transmittal Letter from King County Planning Division

    A March 1980 memo from King County's Planning Division manager Karen Rahm notifies recipients about the Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning, a zoning framework designed to implement the land use guidelines of the 1977 Highline Communities Plan. The memo states that a supplemental draft Environmental Impact Statement was being prepared and would be published in Spring 1980, after which the zoning proposal would be sent to the County Council for adoption. Handwritten notes on the reverse reference page 56, suggesting a potential rezoning from SR to ML (Medium Light industrial) with consideration of buffer zones around ML areas.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, NEPA
  • Highline zoning plan errata 1980 02 20 pdf
    1980-02-20

    Highline Zoning Plan Errata

    Errata document dated February 20, 1980 correcting the Highline Zoning Plan proposed Area Zoning document (pages 1-192) and associated 1″=200′ official Area Zoning maps. Six corrections listed: (1) Map W 7-23-4 (Page 31) corrected to show existing RM-2400 zoning at SW 126th St. east of 12th Ave. SW; (2) Map E9-23-4 (Page 41) corrected to
    TagsHighline Community, Highline Community Plan, History, King County, Land Use, Map
  • 1980-02-20

    Highline Zoning Plan Errata

    This February 20, 1980 errata document lists official corrections to the Highline Zoning Plan, a proposed area zoning document and accompanying maps covering communities in the Highline area near Seattle. The corrections update specific zoning designations on several map sections, such as changing certain parcels to residential multi-family (RM) or business-commercial (B-C) classifications, and fix a text sequencing error in the zoning document. These adjustments reflect policy decisions aimed at guiding land use—including residential density and commercial development—in neighborhoods in the vicinity of what is now Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsHighline Community, Highline Community Plan, History, King County, Land Use, Map
  • 1980-01-03

    North Sea-Tac Park recreation master plan

    This 1980 recreation master plan for North Sea-Tac Park was prepared by Jongejan/Gerrard/McNeal, Inc. as a joint planning effort between the Port of Seattle and King County. The plan identifies community recreational needs, assesses natural and manmade site constraints including airport noise impacts, and proposes development guidelines for the park adjacent to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. It was described at the time as a pioneering example of airport-adjacent land use planning at the national level.
    TagsKing County, Land Use, North Sea-Tac Park, NSTP, Port Of Seattle
  • 1979-08-17

    Letter to King County Council Regarding North Sea-Tac Park Recreation Area

    In an August 17, 1979 letter to the King County Council, Irene Jones, chairperson of Zone 3 meetings, conveyed strong opposition from local residents to developing a recreational park in the North Sea-Tac area near the airport. Attendees at a public meeting cited safety concerns, high noise levels, and potential tax burdens as reasons against the park plan, arguing that the land should first be fully acquired by the POS before any development is considered. Residents emphasized that their top priority was relief through noise-acquisition, purchase assurance, and sound insulation programs for their existing properties.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, King County, King County Council, Noise Remedy Program, North Sea-Tac Park, Sea-Tac Airport, Zone 3 Committee
  • 1979 08 17 zone3 letter north seatac park recreation opposition pdf
    1979-08-17

    Letter to King County Council Regarding North Sea-Tac Park Recreation Area

    Letter dated August 17, 1979 from Irene Jones, chairperson of Zone 3 meetings, to King County Council members Paul Barden and R.R. Bob Greive, expressing community opposition to the North Sea-Tac Park recreation area development. Residents of an aircraft noise-impacted community who attended a public Zone 3 area meeting on August 16, 1979 at the
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, King County, King County Council, Noise Remedy Program, North Sea-Tac Park, Sea-Tac Airport, Zone 3 Committee
  • 1979-02-08

    Environmental Assessment and Addendum: File 224-78-R and 210-79-U — Proposed Boeing Corporate Headquarters Facility, Port Of Seattle, February 8, 1979

    This 1979 environmental assessment from King County's Department of Planning & Community Development evaluates the Port of Seattle's application to rezone approximately five acres near Sea-Tac Airport to allow Boeing to build a corporate headquarters facility, including offices, parking, and a heliport. The proposed Phase I development would include a two-story building with roughly 95,000 square feet of office space and parking for 235 cars, with approximately 200 employees on site. The document also outlines the county's land use history and ordinances governing development on the west side of Sea-Tac Airport, emphasizing protections for adjacent residential neighborhoods.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, environmental assessment, King County, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 … Page 46
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Part150comparison 5" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V