Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(456)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1978-03-09

    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Boeing Company Corporate Headquarters Facility

    Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by King County Department of Planning and Community Development and Port Of Seattle Planning and Research Department for the proposed Boeing Company Corporate Headquarters Facility. The project site lies on the western boundary of Sea-Tac International Airport, east of 12th Avenue South, between approximately South 166th Place and South
    CategoriesHistory TagsBoeing, Environmental Impact Statement, King County, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1978-01-01

    Letter from King County Councilman Bob Grieve on Boeing HQ Relocation and Highline Community Plan

    King County Councilman Bob Greive wrote to constituents expressing his opposition to the relocation of Boeing's headquarters into an open space buffer zone near Sea-Tac Airport, an area designated under the 1977 Highline Community Plan to protect nearby residents from airport-related impacts. Despite his protests, the King County Council voted to amend the comprehensive plan and rezone the land from single-family residential to light manufacturing, with only three of nine council members opposing the measure. Greive vowed to continue fighting airport development that threatened surrounding neighborhoods and asked residents for their input on how to hold the Port Commission, federal government, and King County accountable to their promises regarding Sea-Tac.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tags224-78-R, Bob Grieve, Boeing, Boeing HQ, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, Sea-Tac Airport
  • Stcp chapter unk pg 8 traffic 1973 routes and volume state and county arterials
    1978-01-01

    STCP 1978 Traffic Routes and Volumes: State and County Arterials

    A traffic map from the Sea-Tac Communities Plan (document reference POS 651, section 4.2.7) showing 1978 average daily traffic volumes on state and county arterials in the Sea-Tac area. The map was sponsored by the Port of Seattle and King County, and displays traffic counts on major roads including SR 509, Pacific Highway S, Military Road, and various numbered streets (SW 128th through S 272nd).
    TagsKing County, Map, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • Stcp chapter unk pg 21240 sea tac international airport terminal area plan
    1978-01-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport Terminal Area Plan — Land-Use Map from the Sea-Tac Communities Plan (1978)

    A land-use map from the Sea-Tac Communities Plan showing the Sea-Tac International Airport terminal area as of south 1978, sponsored by the Port of Seattle and King County. The map identifies zones including the terminal complex, airport support, air cargo maintenance, and non-aviation commercial areas, with a legend distinguishing existing buildings, expansions after 1978, and construction by 1978. Document reference number POS 21240.
    TagsKing County, Map, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Highline communities plan final EIS 1977 12 09 pdf
    1977-12-09

    Highline Communities Plan: Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Highline Communities Plan (HCP), prepared by King County Department of Planning and Community Development, Division of Planning, Room W-217, King County Courthouse, Seattle, WA 98104. Responsible Official: Karen Rahm, Manager; Principal author: Dave Baugh. The proposed action is adoption of a Community Plan and Area Zoning for Highline,
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HCP, Highline Community Plan, King County
  • 1977-12-09

    Highline Communities Plan: Final Environmental Impact Statement

    The Highline Communities Plan (HCP) is a King County land use and zoning proposal covering the area between Puget Sound and Interstate 5, from the City of Seattle south to South 252nd Street, including Des Moines and Normandy Park. Prepared by the King County Department of Planning and Community Development and issued in draft form in April 1977, the plan was intended to guide land use policy, area zoning, capital improvements, and housing programs for the Highline Communities Planning Area. Upon adoption, it became the official county policy framework for this coastal suburban region located adjacent to what is now Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HCP, Highline Community Plan, King County
  • 1977-11-01

    Highline Community Plan

    The Highline Community Plan, published by the King County Planning Division in November 1977, outlines land use policies and development guidelines for the Highline communities in unincorporated King County near Seattle. The plan addresses topics including development limitations, drainage and pollution, neighborhood stability, transportation, and parks and recreation. It was developed through a structured community planning process under the King County Department of Planning and Community Development.
    Tagscommunity development, HCP, Highline Community Plan, King County, Land Use
  • 1977-04-29

    Highline Communities EIS Draft

    The Highline Communities EIS Draft, prepared by King County Department of Planning and Community Development in 1977, proposes the adoption of a Community Plan and Area Zoning for the Highline area southwest of Seattle. The plan is intended to guide land use, capital improvements, housing, and utilities policy for communities including Burien, White Center, Des Moines, and Normandy Park. Upon adoption, it would become an element of the King County Comprehensive Plan, with expected benefits including pollution control, improved transportation, and economic stability for the region.
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HCP, Highline Community Plan, King County
  • Highline communities plan draft EIS 1977 04 29 pdf
    1977-04-29

    Highline Communities EIS Draft

    Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Highline Communities Plan (HCP) and Highline Area Zoning, prepared by King County Department of Planning and Community Development, Division of Planning, Room W-217, King County Courthouse, Seattle, WA 98104. Responsible official Karen Rahm, principal author Dave Baugh. The HCP covers the area between the western edge of the
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, HCP, Highline Community Plan, King County
  • 1976-09-01

    Exhibit 16: Highline Communities Plan — Legal and Administrative Framework, Committee Members, and Forward Thrust Fund Reallocation Request (1976–1977)

    This document contains materials from the 1977 Highline Communities Plan, outlining the legal and administrative framework governing the Highline area near Sea-Tac Airport in King County, Washington. It references key planning documents including the 1964 King County Comprehensive Plan and the 1976 Sea-Tac Communities Plan, which sought to balance airport operations with surrounding residential communities through noise mitigation measures such as property acquisition, insulation programs, and land use controls. A 1976 memo from the Highline Communities Plan Committee also requests that Forward Thrust funds not be reallocated until the Highline Communities Plan was formally adopted.
    TagsHighline Communities Plan, King County, King County Council, King County Policy Development Commission, Sea-Tac Communities Plan

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 … Page 46
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Holland & Knight EPA Proposes UCMR 6 for PFAS and Other Contaminants, Declines Adding Microplastics" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V