Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County Council(55)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1982-08-12

    Highline Community Council Meeting Minutes, August 12, 1982

    Minutes from the Highline Community Council meeting held August 12, 1982, covering local governance topics including a discussion on the proposed incorporation of Highline, a King County Council decision to pursue senior housing instead of a planned Civic Center, and updates from the Citizens to Save Puget Sound Committee. The council also approved sending congratulations to a newly appointed Metro Council member and scheduled a candidates night event for October before the General Election.
    TagsGreater Highline Community Parks Board, Highline Community, Highline Community Council, King County Council, Puget Sound
  • Highline community council minutes 1982 08 12 pdf
    1982-08-12

    Highline Community Council Meeting Minutes, August 12, 1982

    Minutes of the Highline Community Council meeting held August 12, 1982, prepared by Secretary Karen Verner. Topics include proposed incorporation of Highline and King County Boundary Review Board proceedings summarized by Joe Breidenbach and Dottie Harper; King County Council decision to adopt a senior housing plan instead of a Civic Center for the Highline area;
    TagsGreater Highline Community Parks Board, Highline Community, Highline Community Council, King County Council, Puget Sound
  • Westside Hilltop v. King County

    Westside Hilltop v. King County 96 Wn.2d 171 (1981) 634 P.2d 862 WESTSIDE HILLTOP SURVIVAL COMMITTEE, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents. No. 46982-2. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. October 8, 1981. *172 Roger M. Leed and Jeffrey M. Eustis, for appellants. Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Susan R. Agid,
    CategoriesFrom The Web, History TagsAppearance of Fairness Doctrine, Boeing, HCP, Highline Community, King County, King County Council, Westside Hilltop Survival Committee
  • 1981-01-01

    King County Council Districts Map, 1981

    This 1981 King County, Washington map depicts the nine County Council Districts, listing each district's representative and contact phone number. Council members included Tracy J. Owen, Scott Blair, Bill Reams, Lois North, Ruby Chow, Bruce Laing, Paul Barden, Bob Greive, and Gary Grant. The map was produced by the King County Council and archived by the Seattle Public Library as a historical state document.
    TagsHistory, King County, King County Council, Map
  • King county ordinance 80 828 highline communities plan senior housing pdf
    1980-08-01

    King County Ordinance 80-828: Amending the Highline Communities Plan to Accommodate Senior Housing

    King County Council ordinance proposed by Paul Barden (Proposed No. 80-828), dated August 1, 1980, amending the Highline Communities Plan as adopted by Ordinance 3530 (1977) to accommodate senior housing. Amends Policy H-10 (page 28) to distinguish elderly multifamily housing from general multifamily housing under RCW 36.69, recognizing reduced neighborhood impacts and site-specific evaluation. Amends
    TagsBurien, Highline Communities Plan, Highline Community Plan, Housing, King County Council, Land Use, letter, Paul Barden
  • 1980-08-01

    King County Ordinance 80-828: Amending the Highline Communities Plan to Accommodate Senior Housing

    A 1980 King County ordinance amending the Highline Communities Plan to better accommodate senior housing, recognizing that elderly-focused multifamily housing generates less neighborhood impact than traditional multifamily development and should be evaluated on its own site-specific merits. The ordinance also updates cultural facilities policy to encourage public-private cooperation in developing a performing arts theatre in the Highline Community, including through the possible formation of a Park and Recreation District.
    TagsBurien, Highline Communities Plan, Highline Community Plan, Housing, King County Council, Land Use, letter, Paul Barden
  • King county planning 1980 03 04 highline communities plan area zoning transmittal pdf
    1980-03-04

    Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning: Transmittal Letter from King County Planning Division

    Letter dated March 4, 1980 from Karen Rahm, Manager of the King County Planning Division, to recipients of the Highline Community Plan Proposed Area Zoning. Transmits a copy of the Proposed Highline Area Zoning, designed to implement the land use portion of the Highline Communities Plan adopted in 1977. Notes that a supplemental draft Environmental
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, NEPA
  • 1980-03-04

    Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning: Transmittal Letter from King County Planning Division

    A March 1980 memo from King County's Planning Division manager Karen Rahm notifies recipients about the Proposed Highline Communities Plan Area Zoning, a zoning framework designed to implement the land use guidelines of the 1977 Highline Communities Plan. The memo states that a supplemental draft Environmental Impact Statement was being prepared and would be published in Spring 1980, after which the zoning proposal would be sent to the County Council for adoption. Handwritten notes on the reverse reference page 56, suggesting a potential rezoning from SR to ML (Medium Light industrial) with consideration of buffer zones around ML areas.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Highline Community Plan, King County, King County Council, Land Use, NEPA
  • 1979-12-21

    Motion No. 4668: King County Council Motion Concurring with Zoning and Subdivision Examiner Recommendation Regarding Reclassification Petitioned by Port Of Seattle, Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R

    In December 1979, the King County Council passed Motion No. 4668, concurring with the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner's recommendation to approve a land reclassification petitioned by the Port of Seattle (File No. 224-78-R), related to development of a Boeing facility near Sea-Tac Airport. As conditions of approval, the Port of Seattle was required to provide 5 acres for a neighborhood park along 12th Avenue South and to enter into a memorandum of understanding with King County freezing development on a 55-acre Westside Greenbelt buffer zone for ten years. The motion also mandated a separate public hearing in affected communities during the site plan approval process, reflecting efforts to balance airport-related development with residential stability concerns.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, King County Council, Land Use, NSTP, Port Of Seattle, Westside Hilltop Survival Committee
  • 1979-12-21

    Motion No. 4668: King County Council Motion Concurring with Zoning and Subdivision Examiner Recommendation Regarding Reclassification Petitioned by Port Of Seattle, Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R

    King County Council Motion No. 4668, introduced by Gary Grant, concurring with the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner’s July 26, 1979 recommendation to approve the reclassification petitioned by Port Of Seattle, Building and Land Development File No. 224-78-R. Pre-ordinance conditions require Port Of Seattle to provide 5 acres adjacent to 12th Avenue South for a neighborhood
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, King County Council, Land Use, NSTP, Port Of Seattle, Westside Hilltop Survival Committee

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Exhibit 76: Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V