Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagFAA(793)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-09

    EXH AR051004: FAA Letter to Army Corps of Engineers Re: STIA Third Runway Environmental Re-Evaluation

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region letter dated August 9, 2001, from Lowell H. Johnson (Manager, Airports Division) to Colonel Ralph Graves (District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Office) regarding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport third runway project. References May 22 meeting and April 30 Memorandum for Record. Describes two written environmental re-evaluations of the Final
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-08

    EXH AR1270: FAA Record of Decision — Environmental Reevaluation for Master Plan Update Development Actions, Sea-Tac International Airport

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region Record of Decision (ROD) dated August 8, 2001, determining that no supplemental EIS is required for Port of Seattle Master Plan Update (MPU) development actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including the Third Runway project. Relies on 1996 Final EIS and 1997 Supplemental EIS (FSEIS). Two environmental reevaluations (Appendix A and Appendix
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR1255: FAA Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on Third Runway — New Technologies, MSE Wall, and Section 106 Activities

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region letter dated June 19, 2001, from FAA to Ms. Muffy Walker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Seattle District Office, following up on May 31, 2001 letter. Addresses three issues raised in April 30, 2001 Memorandum for the Record regarding the Port of Seattle third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-11

    EXH AR1252: ACC Motion for Voluntary Dismissal — Airport Communities Coalition et al. v. FAA and Port Of Seattle, No. 00-70848

    Motion for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Mark C. Rutzick on behalf of petitioners Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), City of Des Moines, City of Normandy Park, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, and Highline School District No. 401 in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 00-70848. Petitioners sought dismissal under
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, ESA, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-31

    Exhibit 2048: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter on STIA Master Plan Update Improvements — Chinook Salmon and Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region to FAA Airport Division Manager Lowell H. Johnson (NMFS No. WSB-00-318) concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2), and finding STIA projects ‘not likely to adversely
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR019469: NMFS Biological Opinion — STIA Master Plan Update, ESA Section 7 & Essential Fish Habitat

    In May 2001, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a biological opinion concluding that planned construction and expansion projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — including a new 8,500-foot runway and other facility upgrades — were not likely to adversely affect threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon or their designated critical habitat. The review, requested by the FAA under the Endangered Species Act, examined potential impacts to nearby waterways such as Miller, Des Moines, and Gilliam creeks, as well as Essential Fish Habitat for coastal and groundfish species. NMFS concurred with the airport's own Biological Assessment, determining the projects could proceed with the mitigation measures proposed.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR050568: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements, Chinook Salmon ESA Section 7 Consultation and Essential Fish Habitat

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region (Seattle, WA) to Lowell H. Johnson, FAA Airport Division Manager, concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR019295: Biological Opinion — FWS Sec 7 Consultation STIA Master Plan Update (Bull Trout, Bald Eagle, Marbled Murrelet)

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a biological opinion in May 2001 evaluating the potential effects of proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on three protected species: bull trout, bald eagle, and marbled murrelet. The review was conducted under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration, which had determined the project was 'not likely to adversely affect' any of the three species. The opinion covers planned airport development in the cities of SeaTac and Des Moines, along with off-site wetland mitigation near the Green River in Auburn, Washington.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR050478: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion — Master Plan Update Improvements, Sea-Tac Airport

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biological opinion (FWS Reference #1-3-00-F-1420) transmitted to Lowell H. Johnson of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding effects of the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements (MPUI) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in King County, Washington on threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-22

    EXH AR017396: FWS Biological Opinion — Master Plan Update Improvements, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) biological opinion (FWS Reference #1-3-00-F-1420) transmitted to Lowell H. Johnson, Federal Aviation Administration, regarding effects of the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements (MPUI) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in King County, Washington on threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) under Section
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR017269: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Draft Technical Meeting Notes, March 14, 2001" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V