FAA Review Comments on Draft Sea-Tac Noise Exposure Update Report: Letter to Jody Yamanaka

A December 17, 1981 letter from FAA Acting Chief Mark A. Beisse to the Port of Seattle summarizes the FAA's major review comments on the draft Sea-Tac Noise Exposure Update Report. The letter identifies multiple deficiencies in the draft, including inadequate coverage of flight track variance ranges, INM model verification, portable noise meter data, and noise impact projections under different operational scenarios. The FAA requested that these issues be addressed in the final report and asked the Port to clarify whether certain project tasks, such as a population and land use survey, would be dropped from the study.

Notes

Letter dated December 17, 1981, from Mark A. Beisse, Acting Chief, Planning and Programming Branch, ANW-610 (FAA Northwest Mountain Region), to Jody Yamanaka, Department of Planning and Research, Port of Seattle, summarizing FAA major review comments on the draft Sea-Tac Noise Exposure Update Report (dated November 1981). Comments address deficiencies across multiple project phases: Phase II Task B (flight track variance range), Phase II Tasks D and E (INM verification and accuracy comparison between INM and NMS, flow directions, NEL adjustments), Phase III Task B (portable noise meter verification, low frequency noise and vibration), Phase III Task C (noise abatement application at Sea-Tac compared to other airports), Phase IV Task A (range of estimates for operations growth and fleet mix, pessimistic/nominal/optimistic noise impact contours), Phase IV Task C (Ldn calculation for airport taxiing noise, ambient noise levels, meteorological data, sensitivity analysis), Phase IV Task D (survey on population patterns and land use, 170 staff hours), and Phase VI Task B (PAC briefings and public meetings). The letter also questions whether consultants oversaw the entire study and support the findings.

V V