Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagFAA(687)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • FAA ‘The Sea-Tac Success Story’ 09/1977

    A draft cover page for a report titled 'Planning for the Airport and Its Environs: The Sea-Tac Success Story,' prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration Office of Environmental Quality in Washington, D.C. The report was prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. of San Mateo, California, and dated September 1977.
    TagsFAA, Peat Marwick Mitchell, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldermisc
  • 1977-09-01

    Planning for the airport and its environs: The Sea-Tac success story

    In the absence of such guidance, what may be termed a "let them sue" approach was essentially followed by the Port during the period from 1957 to 1972.
    TagsDraft, FAA, Office of Environmental Quality, Peat Marwick Mitchell, Robert O. Brown, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldermisc
  • 1975-06-09

    H.R. 7720: Airport and Airway Development Extension Act of 1975

    H.R. 7720, the Airport and Airway Development Extension Act of 1975, was introduced in the House of Representatives on June 9, 1975, to amend the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970. The bill sought to authorize the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for airport development and provide direct payments to certain sponsors during fiscal years 1976 through 1980. It also established national policy for protecting and enhancing natural resources and environmental quality in airport development projects, including measures to mitigate adverse environmental effects from airport operations and aircraft.
    TagsAIP, Airport Improvement Program, FAA, HR7720, LegislationFolderFederal
  • 1974-07-01

    Letter to Arthur H. Yoshioka regarding SeaTac/Communities Plan public meetings

    In this July 1974 letter, George L. Buley of the FAA's Airports Planning Branch writes to Arthur H. Yoshioka of the Port of Seattle regarding the SeaTac/Communities Plan study. Buley recommends holding two or three public meetings in the study area to present the study's conclusions and recommendations to citizens before they are brought before elected officials of the Port and King County. He emphasizes the importance of well-publicized meetings that allow citizens adequate opportunity to ask questions, and urges that the topic be discussed at the upcoming July PAC and TAC meetings.
    CategoriesCorrespondence Tagscommunity engagement, Conformity, FAA, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldermisc
  • 1974-04-03

    FAA Response Letter to Virginia Dana Regarding Sunset Junior High School Closure

    A April 3, 1974 letter from FAA Northwest Region Chief of Airports Planning George L. Buley responds to Seattle resident Mrs. Virginia Dana regarding the possible closure of Sunset Junior High School. The letter acknowledges that the school falls within an area the Port of Seattle proposed to acquire under the FAA's Airport Development Aid Program, and confirms the FAA was actively working with the Port on an environmental impact statement covering the proposed acquisition. Both Sunset Junior High School and Maywood Elementary School were being considered in that environmental review process.
    CategoriesCorrespondence, History TagsFAA, Highline Schools, Maywood Elementary, Port Of Seattle, Sunset ParkFoldermisc
  • 1974-03-25

    Airport Highlights: FAA’s proposed retrofit rule and CAB/BOE security surcharge hearing, March 25, 1974

    A March 25, 1974 edition of Airport Highlights reports that the FAA was set to publish a proposed rule requiring all U.S. airline jet aircraft to meet FAR 36 noise standards by mid-1978, at an estimated cost of $600–800 million for the roughly 1,880 non-compliant jets in the fleet. The EPA was also preparing to release its 'Noise Levels Document' by April 2, outlining noise levels considered harmful to public health, though officials cautioned it should not be treated as a local regulatory standard. Additionally, the CAB Bureau of Economics moved for a full Board hearing on airport security surcharges, citing evidence that carriers were collecting revenue far exceeding their actual security costs.
    TagsAirport Highlights, AOCI, CAB, FAA, Newsletter, Noise Control Act of 1972FolderNewsletters
  • 1974-01-30

    Letter to Port Of Seattle: Petition to Establish South 216th Street as Southern Terminus of Interim Land Acquisition

    A January 30, 1974 letter submitted to David M. Des Voigne of the Port of Seattle presents a petition signed by more than 80 property owners requesting that South 216th Street be established as the southern boundary of an interim land acquisition project near Sea-Tac Airport, bounded by 24th Ave. S. to the east and proposed Highway 509 to the west. The petitioners sought to remove the most severely noise-impacted residences from the expanded clear zone. The letter also cites FAA policy under the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970, which encourages land acquisition to accommodate both current and long-term airport development needs.
    TagsADAP, community engagement, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Land, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldercommittees
  • 1973-09-07

    Report and recommendations re interim land acquisition, Sea-Tac International Airport

    In September 1973, the Port of Seattle outlined a plan to acquire approximately 610 residential properties and 75 acres of open land surrounding Sea-Tac International Airport to create expanded clear zones north and south of the runways. The total estimated property cost was $15.46 million, with the Port anticipating over $8 million in federal FAA assistance and covering the remainder from airport revenues between 1974 and 1977. Under the best-case scenario, actual land acquisition could not begin until after July 1, 1974, following required environmental impact statements, housing relocation plans, and a multi-month FAA review process.
    TagsFAA, Land, Map, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderEnvironment
  • 1973-09-07

    Land use map, heavily notated with property acquisition notes by Virginia Dana

    In September 1973, the Port of Seattle's Director of Aviation recommended an interim land acquisition program around Sea-Tac International Airport, targeting approximately 610 residential parcels and 75 acres of open land in clear zones north and south of the runways. The estimated cost of the acquisitions was $15.46 million, with the FAA expected to contribute over $8 million and the Port of Seattle covering the remaining $8 million from airport revenues between 1974 and 1977. Under the best-case timeline, actual land purchases could not begin until after July 1, 1974, following completion of environmental impact statements, housing relocation plans, and FAA review.
    TagsDon Shay, FAA, Land, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderProperty Acquisition Notes
  • 1973-09-07

    Report and recommendations re interim land acquisition, Sea-Tac International Airport

    A 1973 Port of Seattle memorandum outlines a proposed interim land acquisition program around Sea-Tac International Airport, targeting properties to the north and south of the airport's existing boundaries to establish expanded clear zones. The plan covers approximately 610 residential parcels and 75 acres of open land valued at an estimated $15.46 million, with the Port seeking over $8 million in Federal Aviation Administration funding to offset costs. Land acquisition was projected to begin no earlier than July 1, 1974, following required environmental impact statements, housing relocation plans, and FAA review and approval.
    TagsAirport Expansion, FAA, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderProperties

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V