Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagFAA(514)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2022-10-17

    ACI-NA comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022 opposing a draft policy that would impose new federal review and approval processes on how airports can use land that was federally acquired or conveyed. ACI-NA argued the policy is confusing, could lead to inconsistent decisions across FAA regional offices, and may delay airport development projects and increase costs. The organization urged the FAA to grandfather existing land use designations, clarify key undefined terms, and work collaboratively with airports to revise the policy.
    TagsAirport Improvement Program, Airports Council International, FAA, Land Use, letter
  • 2022-10-17

    NASAO comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    The National Association of State Aviation Officials (NASAO) submitted comments to the FAA in October 2022 regarding a draft policy on land use changes at federally acquired or conveyed airport land. NASAO raised concerns about lengthy lease review processes, the lack of defined timelines for approvals, and unclear procedures for lease renewals and extensions. The letter also questioned how the policy would affect existing leases and called for greater consistency across FAA regions.
    TagsAirport, Airports, FAA, Land Use, letter
  • 2022-10-17

    AAAE comments on draft FAA policy regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land

    The American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) submitted formal comments in October 2022 opposing a proposed FAA policy that would require federal review of individual leases, subleases, and non-aeronautical development projects on federally acquired or conveyed airport land. AAAE argues the policy would reduce airport revenue, slow development, and exceed FAA's appropriate role, which should be limited to aviation safety oversight rather than involvement in specific real estate transactions. The organization urges FAA to maintain existing policies and work collaboratively with the airport industry on any needed improvements.
    TagsAAAE, Airport, FAA, Land Use, letter
  • Section 163

    Section 163 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 regulates the uses of properties acquired by airport sponsors using FAA funds. These include property buyouts for noise mitigation and other non-aeronautical uses. SEC. 163. LIMITED REGULATION OF NON-FEDERALLY SPONSORED PROPERTY. (a) <> In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of Transportation may not
    CategoriesLegislation TagsAirport Layout Plans, ALP, FAA, Land Use, Reauthorization Act Of 2018, Section 163
  • 2022-09-15

    Compliance Guidance Letter 2022-03, FAA guidance regarding the use of airport revenue for noise insulation projects within the DNL 65 dBA and noise monitoring equipment purchases

    This 2022 FAA guidance letter explains how airports can legally spend airport revenue on noise insulation projects, such as new windows, doors, and air conditioning, for homes and schools located within the DNL 65 dBA noise contour — the federal threshold for significant aircraft noise impact. Spending airport revenue on noise insulation for properties outside that noise boundary is generally prohibited as revenue diversion, unless a lower local noise standard has been officially adopted or 'block rounding' has been approved. The letter also clarifies that airports may purchase mobile or permanent noise monitoring equipment using airport revenue, provided certain conditions are met, but monitors cannot be used to enforce noise abatement flight procedures.
    TagsAIP, DNL65, FAA, Noise Mitigation, Noise Monitors
  • 2022-09-15

    Compliance Guidance Letter 2022-03, FAA guidance regarding the use of airport revenue for noise insulation projects within the DNL 65 dBA and noise monitoring equipment purchases

    This 2022 FAA guidance letter explains how airports can legally spend airport revenue on noise insulation projects, such as new windows, doors, and air conditioning, for homes and schools located within the DNL 65 dBA noise contour — the federal threshold for significant aircraft noise impact. Spending airport revenue on noise insulation for properties outside that noise boundary is generally prohibited as revenue diversion, unless a lower local noise standard has been officially adopted or 'block rounding' has been approved. The letter also clarifies that airports may purchase mobile or permanent noise monitoring equipment using airport revenue, provided certain conditions are met, but monitors cannot be used to enforce noise abatement flight procedures.
    TagsAIP, DNL65, FAA, Noise Mitigation, Noise Monitors
  • Draft FAA Policy Regarding Processing Land Use Changes on Federally Acquired or Federally Conveyed Airport Land

    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Proposed policy; request for comments. SUMMARY: This notice is directed to airport sponsors, consultants, and other stakeholders regarding a proposed update of the FAA policy and practice regarding processing land use changes on federally acquired or federally conveyed airport land. The updated policy confirms and clarifies the appropriate
    CategoriesLegislation TagsFAA, Land Use, Section 163
  • King County Council Motion 01019 Grant Application for Sea-Tac Communities Plan

    TagsFAA, King County Council, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • General Aviation Moves Closer to an Unleaded Future

    The FAA’s approval of the use of G100UL fuel in all piston aircraft directly addresses the industry’s long-standing goal of finding solutions that can be used for the entire GA piston fleet. Related To: Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) The FAA on Sept. 1 signed on supplemental type certificates to allow General Aviation Modifications Inc.’s
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAOPA, Aviation Pros, FAA, General Aviation, Lead
  • 2022-09-01

    Navigating Section 163: September 2022 update

    In August 2022, the FAA revised its internal guidance on Section 163, most notably changing how it defines a 'project' so that if any part of a development requires FAA approval, the agency retains authority over the entire project — limiting airports' ability to break larger efforts into smaller pieces to avoid oversight. The FAA also proposed a new land use policy in September 2022 governing how airport sponsors may use federally acquired or conveyed airport land for non-aeronautical purposes, identifying four categories of land use that determine when FAA approval is required. Airport sponsors were encouraged to submit comments on the proposed land use policy before October 17, 2022.
    TagsAirport Law, FAA, Land Use, NEPA, Section 163

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 … Page 52
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Alaska Airlines cancels more flights Monday after a weekend of chaos" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V