Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagDes Moines Creek(162)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-07-01

    EXH AR026404: Memo — Reasonable Potential Analysis Results, STIA Third Runway

    A 1998 internal memo from Parametrix, Inc. summarizes the results of a Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) conducted for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Third Runway project, assessing whether stormwater runoff from the new runway could exceed water quality criteria in Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek. The analysis found that most pollutant concentrations after treatment with best management practices (BMPs) such as bioswales, sand filters, and wet ponds would meet criteria, with the exception of copper, which remained above acceptable levels. The memo also notes that existing pollutant concentrations in the receiving waterways during storms already exceeded criteria, even before accounting for Third Runway runoff.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1998-02-03

    EXH AR024347: EPA Region 10 Letter to Army Corps re Public Notice 96-4-02325 Third Runway Wetlands Fill

    In February 1998, the U.S. EPA Region 10 wrote to the Army Corps of Engineers recommending denial of a permit for the Port of Seattle's proposed third parallel runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, citing concerns over the filling of more than 11 acres of wetlands and portions of Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek. The EPA objected that the applicant's mitigation plan relied almost entirely on off-site wetland replacement in the Green River Valley rather than within the affected watersheds, and questioned whether alternatives to wetland fills for the South Aviation Support Area and on-site borrow areas had been adequately explored. The agency indicated it was willing to work with the Corps and the Port to identify solutions that would satisfy both aviation safety needs and Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) requirements.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, EPA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1997-11-01

    Exhibit 2131: Des Moines Creek Basin Plan (1997)

    1997 Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, November 1997, prepared by the Des Moines Creek Basin Committee comprising City of SeaTac, City of Des Moines, Port of Seattle, and King County. Project technical team led by King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division, with contributors including David Masters, David Hartley, Alan Johnson,
    TagsACC, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 14
  • 1997-06-01

    Exhibit AR022300: Port Of Seattle Storm Water Receiving Environment Monitoring Report for NPDES Permit No. WA-002465-1

    This June 1997 report, prepared by the Port of Seattle for Washington State's Department of Ecology, presents storm water receiving environment monitoring results conducted under NPDES Permit No. WA-002465-1. It covers water quality topics including instream toxicity bioassays, sediment quality, identification of pollution sources, metals speciation, vegetation management, and streambank erosion in Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek watersheds near Sea-Tac Airport. The findings assess the environmental impact of airport storm water runoff on local waterways and identify contributing pollution sources within each creek basin.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 09
  • 1997-06-01

    Symonds Stormwater System June 1997

    Engineering drawing prepared by Symonds Consulting Engineers for the Port of Seattle, titled 'Comprehensive Storm Drainage System Plan and Design – Storm Water Conveyance System, June 1997 Planned Conditions' (Drawing No. C-3258, Project No. 94066). The plan depicts SeaTac International Airport's stormwater drainage basins, outfall locations (Outfalls 002–016), storm flow monitoring locations, and drainage connections to Des Moines Creek and its east tributary.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, Map, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderSea-Tac Airport
  • 1996-11-01

    EXH AR039950: Fill Material Alternative Delivery Method Study for Third Runway, Phase I — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    HNTB-prepared Final Draft Phase I study (November 1996) for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway fill material alternative delivery methods. Evaluates transport corridors including Corridor 1 (Des Moines Creek barge transfer and land conveyor), Corridor 2 (SR 509 conveyor, truck, rail), and Corridor 3 (SR 518 conveyor, truck, rail). Covers technical viability, construction/environmental permitting (local, state, federal),
    TagsACC, Conveyor, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, SR509, Third RunwayFolderBox 17
  • 1993-12-22

    Port Of Seattle Letter to Barbara Stuhring: Ethylene Glycol Deicing at Sea-Tac Airport and Wastewater Treatment

    A 1993 letter from the Port of Seattle to a Des Moines resident explains that airline deicing at Sea-Tac Airport uses only FAA-approved ethylene or propylene glycol, and that wastewater from deicing drains to the airport's treatment system before being discharged to Puget Sound — not to Miller or Des Moines Creeks. The Port acknowledged its treatment plant was not designed to handle glycols and was evaluating upgrades. A follow-up 1996 letter challenges a contradictory statement in the airport's Final Environmental Impact Statement, which claimed most deicing fluids were contained and treated by the Port's Industrial Wastewater System.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsDeicing, Des Moines Creek, EIS, Environmental Impact Statement, Ethylene Gycol, FAA, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderThird Runway
  • 1992-02-01

    Des Moines Creek water quality study

    A 1992 water quality study of Des Moines Creek, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the FAA and Port of Seattle, assessed the health of the creek during storm runoff events. The creek, which originates near Sea-Tac International Airport and flows to Puget Sound, had its aquatic ecosystem severely damaged by jet fuel spills in 1985 and 1986. The study sampled seven locations along the creek and three tributaries to identify water quality problems and determine whether stormwater pollution from airport operations was causing toxic conditions.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, FAA, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderDes Moines
  • Des Moines Creek Parametrix 1992 Water Quality Study Monitoring Stations
    1991-12-18

    Des Moines Creek Parametrix 1992 Water Quality Study Monitoring Stations Map

    A map dated December 18, 1991 showing water quality monitoring stations (labeled DC-1 through DC-8 and TRIB-1 through TRIB-3) along Des Moines Creek and its tributaries in the Des Moines, Washington area near Sea-Tac Airport. The map identifies local landmarks including Bow Lake, Angle Lake, Puget Sound, Des Moines Marina, and major roads including Pacific Highway S, SR 99, and Military Road.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, Map, Water QualityFolderDes Moines
  • Stcp chapter 6 pg 28 sea tac communities plan
    1976-06-16

    Sea-Tac Communities Plan South Acquisition Area Equestrian Zone Map, June 1976

    A planning map labeled 'Sea-Tac Communities Plan' showing the south acquisition area designated for equestrian use, featuring a 38-acre equestrian zone, Hillgrove Cemetery, a community use reserve, and adjacent park areas near Des Moines Creek. The document is numbered POS 994, revised June 16, 1976, sponsored by the Port of Seattle and King County, and catalogued as page 28, section 6.6.3.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, Hillgrove Cemetery, Map, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Communities PlanFoldermaps

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR029135: Draft Technical Meeting Notes — 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway, March 14, 2001" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V