Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagDes Moines Creek(162)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-01-03

    Exhibit 220: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster re Des Moines Creek Fish and POS Third Runway Stormwater Review

    A January 2000 internal email from EPA's Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster addresses concerns about premature deaths of Coho salmon in Des Moines Creek near Sea-Tac Airport, in the context of the proposed third runway project. The email clarifies that stormwater discharge regulation will be handled through NPDES permits rather than Section 401 Water Quality Certifications, as the NPDES permit provides the only mechanism for ongoing regulatory oversight under the Clean Water Act. Hellwig directs Luster to defer to the Water Quality Program on stormwater issues and to stop raising the 401 Certification as an alternative avenue for addressing water quality standards.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-01-03

    EXH AR033704: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster RE: Des Moines Creek Fish and Third Runway Stormwater Review

    Email dated January 3, 2000 from Raymond Hellwig (WQ Program) to Tom Luster (SEA Program), cc’d to Ron Langley, Dave Garland, Erik Stockdale, Gordon White, Jeannie Summerhays, John Glynn, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Paula Ehlers, Megan White, and Dan Silver. Responds to Luster’s December 23, 1999 message regarding premature death of Coho salmon in Des Moines Creek
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 1999-12-01

    Water District reaches settlement agreement with Port Of Seattle

    In November 1999, Highline Water District and the Port of Seattle reached a settlement agreement resolving competing claims over two water rights near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Under the deal, the Port retained rights to Well #1 for uses including Des Moines Creek flow augmentation tied to the proposed third runway project, while the District secured rights to a replacement for Well #2 to continue providing drinking water to its 58,000 customers. The District emphasized that the agreement was strictly about protecting its water rights and service area, and that it took no official position on the controversial third runway expansion.
    TagsDes Moines Creek, Highline Water District, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderEnvironment
  • 1999-11-01

    EXH AR041945: Des Moines Creek Regional Capital Improvement Project Preliminary Design Report — Alternative Analysis Addendum

    Addendum to the Des Moines Creek Regional Capital Improvement Project Preliminary Design Report, prepared November 1, 1999 by King County Capital Improvement Project Design Team for the Des Moines Creek Basin Committee. Prepared for Tim Heydon (City of Des Moines), Tom Hubbard (Port Of Seattle), David Masters (King County), Don Monaghan (City of SeaTac), and
    TagsACC, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines, Des Moines Creek, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 18
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR023797: Ecology Letter – Dissolved Oxygen De-Icing Study Final Draft, STIA

    In this October 1999 letter, the Washington State Department of Ecology reviewed a study by the Port of Seattle examining how de-icing chemicals used at Sea-Tac International Airport affect water quality in Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Ecology found significant deficiencies in the study, including incorrect water quality classifications, too few de-icing events sampled, and inadequate monitoring methods, concluding that dissolved oxygen levels in both creeks frequently failed to meet applicable standards. The agency requested that the Port resubmit the study with corrections before a determination could be made about whether de-icing operations were being properly managed to protect local waterways.
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR042698: Sea-Tac Airport Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study and Ecology Response Letter

    Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study prepared by Cosmopolitan Engineering Group for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport (AR042698, August 1999), examining impacts of de-icing agents from airport stormwater runoff on Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek, including BOD5 discharges to NW Ponds and Lake Reba. Accompanied by Washington State Department of Ecology (NWRO) response letter dated
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 18
  • 1999-10-20

    EXH AR023711: Internal Email — Tom Luster on Sea-Tac Third Runway 401 Certification and Reasonable Assurance

    In this October 1999 internal memo, Washington State Department of Ecology staffer Tom Luster describes a meeting with his supervisor Paula regarding the agency's water quality review of Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Luster explains that he cannot yet provide 'reasonable assurance' that the Port of Seattle's proposal will meet water quality standards for Des Moines Creek, citing inadequate stormwater treatment plans and the Port's removal of flow augmentation measures from its mitigation plan. He expresses concern that management pressure to approve the project quickly could compromise the integrity of the regulatory review process.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-09-16

    Exhibit 2115: Internal Email — Ecology on Sea-Tac Water Quality Standards Compliance, Des Moines Creek 401 Certification

    Internal email from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers, dated September 16, 1999, regarding SeaTac Airport 401 certification and compliance with water quality standards under the Clean Water Act. Discusses non-attainment of water quality standards in Des Moines Creek and Miller Creek, antidegradation requirements, Level 2 detention requirements,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 1999-09-16

    EXH AR027877: Internal Email on Unresolved Sea-Tac Stormwater Issues — 401/CZM Review, Des Moines Creek RDF, and Water Quality BMPs

    Internal email from Tom Luster (Washington State Department of Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers dated September 16, 1999, outlining unresolved stormwater issues in the 401/CZM review of Port Of Seattle’s Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Expansion. Topics include: definitions of ‘modified Level 1’ and ‘Level 2-type flow control’; role of
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 1999-09-07

    EXH AR024681: Sensitivity Analysis Mixing Zone Parameters (cont.) — Stormwater Mgmt

    A 1999 technical memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. analyzes whether stormwater discharged near Des Moines Creek meets Washington State dissolved copper water quality criteria, using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The analysis finds that copper levels in the stormwater effluent consistently exceed water quality standards regardless of background ambient concentrations, with dilution factors generally less than 2. The study evaluates several potential remedies, including increased onsite detention, expanded mixing zones, and water effect ratio adjustments, finding that the Water Effect Ratio (WER) is the most influential factor in achieving compliance.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2026 SoilSHOP Series – Des Moines" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V