Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagDes Moines Creek(169)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR023797: Ecology Letter – Dissolved Oxygen De-Icing Study Final Draft, STIA

    In this October 1999 letter, the Washington State Department of Ecology reviewed a study by the Port of Seattle examining how de-icing chemicals used at Sea-Tac International Airport affect water quality in Miller and Des Moines Creeks. Ecology found significant deficiencies in the study, including incorrect water quality classifications, too few de-icing events sampled, and inadequate monitoring methods, concluding that dissolved oxygen levels in both creeks frequently failed to meet applicable standards. The agency requested that the Port resubmit the study with corrections before a determination could be made about whether de-icing operations were being properly managed to protect local waterways.
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-10-21

    EXH AR042698: Sea-Tac Airport Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study and Ecology Response Letter

    Dissolved Oxygen Deicing Study prepared by Cosmopolitan Engineering Group for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport (AR042698, August 1999), examining impacts of de-icing agents from airport stormwater runoff on Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek, including BOD5 discharges to NW Ponds and Lake Reba. Accompanied by Washington State Department of Ecology (NWRO) response letter dated
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-10-20

    EXH AR023711: Internal Email — Tom Luster on Sea-Tac Third Runway 401 Certification and Reasonable Assurance

    In this October 1999 internal memo, Washington State Department of Ecology staffer Tom Luster describes a meeting with his supervisor Paula regarding the agency's water quality review of Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Luster explains that he cannot yet provide 'reasonable assurance' that the Port of Seattle's proposal will meet water quality standards for Des Moines Creek, citing inadequate stormwater treatment plans and the Port's removal of flow augmentation measures from its mitigation plan. He expresses concern that management pressure to approve the project quickly could compromise the integrity of the regulatory review process.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1999-09-16

    Exhibit 2115: Internal Email — Ecology on Sea-Tac Water Quality Standards Compliance, Des Moines Creek 401 Certification

    Internal email from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers, dated September 16, 1999, regarding SeaTac Airport 401 certification and compliance with water quality standards under the Clean Water Act. Discusses non-attainment of water quality standards in Des Moines Creek and Miller Creek, antidegradation requirements, Level 2 detention requirements,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-09-16

    EXH AR027877: Internal Email on Unresolved Sea-Tac Stormwater Issues — 401/CZM Review, Des Moines Creek RDF, and Water Quality BMPs

    Internal email from Tom Luster (Washington State Department of Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Erik Stockdale, and Paula Ehlers dated September 16, 1999, outlining unresolved stormwater issues in the 401/CZM review of Port Of Seattle’s Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Expansion. Topics include: definitions of ‘modified Level 1’ and ‘Level 2-type flow control’; role of
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1999-09-07

    EXH AR024681: Sensitivity Analysis Mixing Zone Parameters (cont.) — Stormwater Mgmt

    A 1999 technical memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. analyzes whether stormwater discharged near Des Moines Creek meets Washington State dissolved copper water quality criteria, using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The analysis finds that copper levels in the stormwater effluent consistently exceed water quality standards regardless of background ambient concentrations, with dilution factors generally less than 2. The study evaluates several potential remedies, including increased onsite detention, expanded mixing zones, and water effect ratio adjustments, finding that the Water Effect Ratio (WER) is the most influential factor in achieving compliance.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1999-08-18

    EXH AR024924: Draft Memo — Range-Finding Water-Effect Ratio Results, Ceriodaphnia dubia, STIA Third Runway WER Study

    This draft memorandum from Parametrix (dated April 20, 1999) summarizes range-finding toxicity tests conducted as part of a water-effect ratio (WER) study examining copper levels in streams receiving stormwater runoff from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Water samples were collected from Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek during a storm event in February 1999 and tested using the organism Ceriodaphnia dubia to measure copper toxicity. Results showed water effect ratios ranging from 6.7 to 16.0, leading researchers to recommend pursuing a definitive WER study and a site-specific water quality standard for copper.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1999-06-29

    Exhibit 026593: Memorandum — Review of Draft De-Icing Dissolved Oxygen Report

    Memorandum from Ken Ludwa of Parametrix, Inc. to Elizabeth Leavitt, dated June 29, 1999, reviewing the Draft De-Icing Dissolved Oxygen Report related to Sea-Tac Airport runway and taxiway acetate washoff. Comments address dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standards (8 mg/L Class A, 9.5 mg/L Class AA) in Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek, NW Ponds,
    TagsACC, Deicing, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-06-13

    Exhibit 224: Email Chain RE: Sea-Tac – Comments on May 17th Meeting, Water Quality Standards and 401 Certification for Des Moines Creek

    This 1999 email exchange between Washington State Department of Ecology staff debates the legal basis for requiring the Port of Seattle to restore water quality in Des Moines Creek as a condition of receiving a Section 401 water quality certification for the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. The central question is whether Ecology can require a single applicant to fix broader watershed problems that pre-exist their project, or whether mitigation can only address the applicant's direct project impacts. Staff ultimately conclude that under antidegradation requirements, no further degradation of the creek can be permitted until existing beneficial uses are restored, meaning the Port's mitigation plan must include measures such as flow augmentation and stormwater controls to bring the creek into compliance with water quality standards.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1999-06-13

    Exhibit 2106: ATG MI Sea-Tac Third Runway — Email Chain on Water Quality Standards and 401 Permit Review for Des Moines Creek

    Email chain (AR 033708–033710) among Washington State Department of Ecology staff Paula Ehlers, Tom Luster, and Raymond Hellwig, with ATG staff Tom McDonald and Joan Marchioro, dated June 1–13, 1999, regarding the Port Of Seattle third runway proposal and 401 water quality certification for Des Moines Creek. Discusses antidegradation requirements under Washington Water Quality Standards
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Letter from Jeffrey N. Gazzard regarding WHO Community Noise Standards and Airport Noise Inquiry" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V