Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-20

    CASE’s final list of new witnesses and exhibits

    Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) submits its final list of new witnesses and exhibits as required by the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s Order Granting Intervention. The witness list includes two King County DNR representatives, and the exhibit list covers construction stormwater monitoring documents, an NPDES permit, and discharge monitoring reports related to the Port of
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-19

    Letter to Kaleen Cottingham re: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Attorney Rachael Paschal Osborn writes to the Presiding Officer of the Pollution Control Hearings Board seeking expedited resolution of a service timing dispute. The Port of Seattle filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue on February 8, 2002, but failed to serve Osborn’s office by facsimile as indicated in its Certificate of
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-19

    Memorandum in response to Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issue

    The Washington State Department of Ecology submits this memorandum in support of the Port of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on the question of SEPA compliance in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology argues that both the Port and Ecology complied with SEPA requirements, including completion of an EIS, SEIS, and addenda addressing newly discovered wetland
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-14

    Pollution Control Hearings Board’s response to motion to set aside agency action

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) submits this response to the Port of Seattle’s Motion to Set Aside Agency Action in Thurston County Superior Court. The brief addresses three matters: the PCHB’s compliance with procedural statute RCW 43.21B.320, the scope of judicial review under the APA, and jurisdictional questions raised by the Port. The PCHB
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-12

    Prefiled written testimony of Dr. John Strand

    Pre-filed written testimony by Dr. John Strand, a fisheries biologist, submitted on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160. Dr. Strand outlines his qualifications, including his PhD in Fisheries Biology from the University of Washington and his research on stormwater residuals in Miller and Des Moines Creeks. The testimony was submitted
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Stipulation and agreed order modifying due dates for joint status report and for providing board with estimate of time needed for hearing

    A stipulation and agreed order filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington in PCHB No. 01-160, involving the Airport Communities Coalition, the Department of Ecology, and the Port of Seattle. The document requests extensions of deadlines for filing a Joint Status Report and providing an estimate of hearing time, both
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issue

    The Port of Seattle filed a motion for partial summary judgment before the Pollution Control Hearings Board seeking dismissal of Agreed Issue No. 14 regarding SEPA compliance. The Port argues the Board lacks jurisdiction to hear the Airport Communities Coalition’s claims that environmental impact statements for the Master Plan Update were legally inadequate and that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Declaration of Michael Feldman supporting Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issue

    Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities and Environmental Programs at the Port of Seattle, declares facts supporting the Port’s motion for partial summary judgment in PCHB Case No. 01-160. The declaration summarizes the history of environmental review for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update, including the FEIS, SEIS, FAA Record of Decision, and subsequent
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-06

    Denial of summary judgment – Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board denied a motion for summary judgment filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) regarding whether the Port of Seattle was required to obtain a water right to implement low stream flow conditions in its §401 certification for the Third Runway expansion. The two-member Board reached contrary positions on the motion,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-01-31

    Certificate of record transmission – Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington, Department of Ecology and the Port Of Seattle

    A certificate from the Pollution Control Hearings Board certifying that the materials transmitted are true and exact copies of original documents and exhibits compiled for PCHB Case No. 01-160. The document notes that the Board did not produce a transcript of oral testimony, and that any party wishing a transcript must order it from the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH2122033807" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V