Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-06-01

    EXH AR045402: Preliminary Stability and Settlement Analyses — Subgrade Improvements, MSE Wall Support, Third Runway Project

    Hart Crowser report (J-4978-22) prepared for HNTB, June 2000, analyzing preliminary stability and settlement for subgrade improvements supporting Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls at the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Project. Covers three MSE wall locations — North Safety Area, West MSE Wall, South MSE Wall — with analysis of subgrade improvement alternatives including overexcavation and
    TagsACC, Construction, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-30

    EXH AR023743: Internal Deliberative Notes — Third Runway EIS Fill, Stormwater, Tyee Pond, Soil Fill Criteria, Water Quality BMPs

    These internal deliberative notes from 5/30/00 discuss fill and stormwater management issues related to a construction or development project, covering topics such as soil fill acceptance criteria, Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality, spill containment features at Tyee Pond, and monitoring requirements for dissolved metals. The notes reference coordination among multiple regulatory frameworks including Section 401, CZM, and MTCA, and address questions about impervious liner hydrologic impacts and remediation procedures. Key action items include developing an approved stormwater plan, establishing soil sampling protocols for borrow sites, and determining upfront versus incremental BMP implementation strategies.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-25

    EXH 288: First Avenue Bridge Fill Source Data Summary

    This document summarizes soil contamination test results for fill material taken from the First Avenue Bridge site, collected between October 1999 and May 2000. Samples were tested for petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel and heavy oil ranges) as well as RCRA 8 metals and other contaminants, with results indicating varying levels of heavy oil detected across samples. The table notes which soil samples were ultimately placed at the Third Runway construction site at Sea-Tac Airport, with several samples excluded due to contamination concerns.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, WSDOT
  • 2000-05-24

    EXH AR022970: ACC Review Letter — SR509 Temp Interchange Wetland 43 Impacts

    A professional wetland scientist reviewed the construction plans for a temporary SR509 interchange near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and concluded that the project would cause harmful sediment-laden stormwater runoff to discharge into nearby Wetland 43. The report found that the wetland boundary was significantly closer to the construction zone than project documents indicated, and that the steep slopes and sparse vegetation of the construction site made sediment runoff unavoidable. The scientist determined that the planned temporary erosion control measures were inadequate to protect the wetland, particularly during unexpected storm events.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SR509, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-23

    EXH AR018449: Sea-Tac Internal Meeting Notes — Wildlife Hazard Plan, Easements, Groundwater Model, Cumulative Impacts

    Handwritten notes from a SeaTac internal meeting on 5-23-00 (AR 018449, Exhibit 180), attended by Jeannie, Ray H., Tom L., Joan M., John Glynn, Kevin P., and Paula Chlos. Topics include resolving conflicts between wildlife hazard plan and mitigation plan, sideboard definitions needed; need for ETA statement on conflict with circular and whether it meets
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Handwritten Notes, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-05-23

    EXH AR022964: ACC Review Letter — Wetlands Impacts, Temp Interchange SR-509 & S. 176th St

    A May 2000 environmental science review raised concerns that construction of a temporary highway interchange near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's third runway would cause direct sediment runoff into the adjacent Wetland 43. The report found that the wetland boundary was up to 50 feet closer to the construction zone than project documents indicated, and that the steep slopes and inadequate erosion controls would fail to prevent sediment-laden stormwater from damaging the wetland's water quality and aquatic habitat.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SR509, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-22

    EXH AR044677: Port Of Seattle Letter Withdrawing and Resubmitting CZMA Consistency Statement for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Letter dated May 22, 2000 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs at Port Of Seattle, to Tom Luster at Washington Department of Ecology (Environmental Coordination Section), withdrawing the December 6, 1999 CZMA Consistency Statement and simultaneously submitting a new one to reset the six-month review period under 33 C.F.R. Sec. 325.2. The withdrawal
    TagsACC, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-19

    Exhibit 167: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Thomas Fitzsimmons Re: Sea-Tac 3rd Runway Permitting Timeline

    Email dated May 19, 2000 from Raymond Hellwig (City of Des Moines) to Thomas Fitzsimmons regarding the SeaTac 3rd Runway permitting process. Discusses tight July 2000 decision-making timeframe, King County review of Port Of Seattle stormwater management plan requiring up to 10 more weeks, development of a definitive issues list for the proposed runway, drafting
    TagsACC, CASE, City Of Des Moines, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-19

    EXH AR017773: Internal Email — Sea-Tac Third Runway Decision-Making Timeline and Workload Management

    Email from Raymond Hellwig to Thomas Fitzsimmons dated May 19, 2000, regarding the SeaTac Third Runway permitting process and July 2000 decision-making timeframe. Discusses King County review of Port Of Seattle stormwater management plan requiring up to 10 more weeks, internal staff meetings to develop a definitive issues list, drafting 401 language for resolved issues,
    TagsACC, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2000-05-15

    EXH AR017771: Ecology Internal Email — May 16 Meeting with Port Of Seattle on Third Runway 401 and CZM Review

    Raymond Hellwig (Washington State Department of Ecology) emails Joe Dear and colleagues on May 15, 2000, as an addendum to a memo preparing for a May 16 meeting with Port Of Seattle regarding the Sea-Tac Third Runway. Explains that the one-year 401 Water Quality Certification evaluation period restarted September 1999, with a possible July 2000
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Resolution No. 3245: Reaffirming adoption of a Master Plan Update for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport" — , 1997

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V