Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-06

    EXH AR049967: Addendum to STIA North Electric Service Upgrade Determination of Non-Significance

    Port of Seattle SEPA addendum (POS SEPA No. 01-05, AR 049967) dated March 6, 2001, for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport North Electric Service Upgrade project. Documents a revised proposal for the North Main Service Point site location and 12.5 kV cable route connecting to the Bow Lake Substation via International Boulevard near South 176th Street.
    TagsACC, Construction, Environmental Review, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPAFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR049873: Essential Fish Habitat Assessment — Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA

    Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and Port Of Seattle for Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), March 2001. Document AR049873 (project 556-2912-001) evaluates Pacific Coast salmon EFH — Chinook, Coho, and Puget Sound Pink salmon — in Miller Creek Basin, Des Moines Creek
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SalmonFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR050023: Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package, Borrow Areas 3 and 4, Sea-Tac International Airport

    Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package for Borrow Areas 3 and 4 at Sea-Tac International Airport, City of SeaTac, Washington. Prepared by Hart Crowser for Port Of Seattle for presentation to the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), March 1, 2001, project J-4978-62. Document covers site preparation activities, mining practices, operating plan, conceptual reclamation plan, revegetation
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 2040: King County Letter to Ecology Reviewing Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 12
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 48: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Stormwater Management Plan Review for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director, King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport. The letter references
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH AR023598: ACC Comment Letter Opposing STIA Third Runway 401 Certification and 404 Permit

    A February 2001 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, representing the Airport Communities Coalition (cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and the Highline School District), urges the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology to deny the Port of Seattle's permits for the proposed Sea-Tac third runway. The letter argues that the Port had already spent nearly $300 million on construction before receiving required Clean Water Act approvals, and that its application lacked adequate stormwater management plans and failed to meet water quality standards. Independent experts retained by the coalition found the Port's environmental mitigation proposals to be technically flawed, incomplete, and legally insufficient.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR018360: Sheldon & Associates Response to 2000 Public Notice Comments — Water Movement Through Fill and MSE Wall

    Sheldon & Associates letter dated February 15, 2001, responding to public notice comments regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Masterplan Update Projects Section 404/401 Permits. Addresses movement of water through embankment fill and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall, drainage layer design to prevent excess pore pressures, rock underdrain clogging prevention using Group 1A filter material, shallow
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR019097: Sheldon & Associates to Army Corps & Ecology — STIA Third Runway Natural Resource Mitigation Plan Review

    A 2001 environmental review letter from Sheldon & Associates, commissioned by the Airport Communities Coalition, challenges the Port of Seattle's technical documents for the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review finds that the Port has not adequately demonstrated that massive fill placement and engineered retaining walls would avoid long-term damage to downslope wetlands, groundwater flows, and Miller Creek. Key unresolved concerns include the reliability of the proposed underdrain system, incomplete baseline data, and the lack of independent construction oversight.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-13

    EXH 332: Declaration John J. Strunk Supporting Response Opposing ACC Motion for Stay

    A declaration by geologist John J. Strunk of Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) submitted to Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board describes groundwater contamination studies conducted at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in connection with the proposed Third Runway project. The studies found that while contamination exists in shallow groundwater zones within the Airport's Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA), it is isolated and located approximately 2,800 feet from the Third Runway site, with water flow predominantly directed away from that area. AESI concluded that subsurface utility lines do not appear to be a significant pathway for contaminant migration toward the Third Runway construction zone.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-02-08

    EXH AR049869: Hart Crowser Letter — Comments on 404/401 Permit Applications for Port Of Seattle Third Runway MSE Retaining Walls

    Letter dated February 8, 2001 from Hart Crowser Principal Geotechnical Engineer to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny), documenting comments made at the January 26, 2001 public hearing on 404/401 permit applications J-4978-30-06. Comments focus on the design and independent technical review of mechanically stabilized earth
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Technical Memorandum No. 2: Inventory of Existing Conditions — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport" — , 2015

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V