Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMiller Creek(260)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-08-01

    Impact/mitigation sites for proposed master plan update improvements at Seattle Tacoma International Airport

    This August 2002 document outlines proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), submitted by the Port of Seattle. It details construction projects including a third runway, runway safety areas, terminal expansions, and air cargo facilities, along with wetland impact mitigation measures in the Miller Creek Basin. The plans include on-site and off-site wetland mitigation areas, MSE retaining walls to minimize environmental impacts, and creek relocations across multiple sections of King County, Washington.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Master Plan, Miller Creek, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-01

    Impact/mitigation sites for proposed master plan update improvements at Seattle Tacoma International Airport

    This August 2002 permit application by the Port of Seattle outlines proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including the construction of a third runway, expanded taxiways, cargo facilities, and terminal upgrades. The documents map both on-site and off-site wetland mitigation areas required to offset environmental impacts, with retaining walls and creek relocations used to minimize effects on wetlands and Miller Creek. The project spans multiple sections of King County, Washington, and includes detailed plans for stormwater detention, runway safety areas, and property acquisition boundaries.
    TagsMaster Plan, Miller Creek, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-15

    EXH 347: ACC Second Supplemental Response to RFP No. 2 — Expert Witness Docs

    This document is a legal filing from the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) submitted to Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board in a case against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It lists technical documents and studies relied upon by ACC's expert witnesses, covering topics such as retaining wall and slope alternatives affecting Miller Creek, seismic analysis of reinforced soil walls, and stormwater runoff management near Sea-Tac Airport. The referenced materials include engineering evaluations, water quality research, and stormwater best management practice guidelines relevant to the airport's expansion impacts.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Prefiled testimony (with errata corrections) of Joseph Brascher of AQUA TERRA Consultants submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Brascher testifies regarding low streamflow hydrologic modeling at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-14

    EXH AR002283: Port Of Seattle Errata for Prefiled Testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. and Prefiled Testimony of Joseph Brascher, PCHB 01-160

    Port Of Seattle submits errata to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB 01-160) correcting prefiled testimony of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. and Joseph Brascher. Kelley’s testimony contained typographical errors on three pages; Brascher’s testimony omitted the final two lines of paragraph 39 due to computer pagination differences. Corrected testimony addresses wetland delineation, ACOE field review,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-13

    PCHB Doc 78 AR002396: ACC and CASE Prehearing Brief — Third Runway 401 Certification Appeal

    Prehearing brief filed by appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and intervenor-appellant Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB No. 01-160, appealing the Washington Department of Ecology’s August 10, 2001 Section 401 Clean Water Act certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. Documents the Port of Seattle’s proposal to fill a canyon with 20 million
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH 458: Review Comments Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Dec 2001

    This February 2002 draft document from King County Department of Natural Resources presents technical review comments on the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review identifies several deficiencies in the hydrologic modeling for Walker Creek and Miller Creek, including inconsistencies in impervious area calculations, questionable vault-filling timelines, and concerns about the accuracy of observed streamflow data used for calibration. King County recommends additional refinements before approving the revised impact numbers, and suggests that Ecology and the Port establish a formal compliance oversight process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-20

    EXH AR053454: Existing and Post Project Conditions Maps, Sheets 1–3 of 8 — Sea-Tac Airport Wetlands and Miller Creek

    Parametrix-prepared maps (Sheets 1-3 of 8, AR 053454-053456, dated February 20, 2002) depicting existing and post-project conditions near Sea-Tac Airport, showing wetlands, impacted wetlands, impervious surfaces, stormwater detention facilities, stormwater vaults, mitigation area buffers, permanent impact areas, prior converted cropland, Miller Creek, parcel boundaries, permanent impact lines, MSE wall, and airport navigation aids. Maps cover
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Map, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR053453: Future Subbasins, Watersheds and Detention Facilities Map

    AR 053453. Map prepared by Parametrix, Inc. dated February 19, 2002, depicting future subbasins, watersheds, and detention facilities at Sea-Tac Airport. Shows water features including Miller Creek, Old Madres Creek, Walker Creek, detention facilities, proposed stormwater management facilities, reactive low-flow vaults and infiltration facilities, Master Plan impervious surfaces, future watershed boundaries, future subbasin boundaries, discharge
    TagsACC, Map, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 26
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Airport Terminal and Parking Structure" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V