Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMiller Creek(252)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-13

    PCHB Doc 78 AR002396: ACC and CASE Prehearing Brief — Third Runway 401 Certification Appeal

    Prehearing brief filed by appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and intervenor-appellant Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB No. 01-160, appealing the Washington Department of Ecology’s August 10, 2001 Section 401 Clean Water Act certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. Documents the Port of Seattle’s proposal to fill a canyon with 20 million
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH 458: Review Comments Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Dec 2001

    This February 2002 draft document from King County Department of Natural Resources presents technical review comments on the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review identifies several deficiencies in the hydrologic modeling for Walker Creek and Miller Creek, including inconsistencies in impervious area calculations, questionable vault-filling timelines, and concerns about the accuracy of observed streamflow data used for calibration. King County recommends additional refinements before approving the revised impact numbers, and suggests that Ecology and the Port establish a formal compliance oversight process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 14
  • 2002-02-20

    EXH AR053454: Existing and Post Project Conditions Maps, Sheets 1–3 of 8 — Sea-Tac Airport Wetlands and Miller Creek

    Parametrix-prepared maps (Sheets 1-3 of 8, AR 053454-053456, dated February 20, 2002) depicting existing and post-project conditions near Sea-Tac Airport, showing wetlands, impacted wetlands, impervious surfaces, stormwater detention facilities, stormwater vaults, mitigation area buffers, permanent impact areas, prior converted cropland, Miller Creek, parcel boundaries, permanent impact lines, MSE wall, and airport navigation aids. Maps cover
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Map, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 22
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH AR053453: Future Subbasins, Watersheds and Detention Facilities Map

    AR 053453. Map prepared by Parametrix, Inc. dated February 19, 2002, depicting future subbasins, watersheds, and detention facilities at Sea-Tac Airport. Shows water features including Miller Creek, Old Madres Creek, Walker Creek, detention facilities, proposed stormwater management facilities, reactive low-flow vaults and infiltration facilities, Master Plan impervious surfaces, future watershed boundaries, future subbasin boundaries, discharge
    TagsACC, Map, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 22
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 459: Proposed Agenda Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting – Walker, Miller, Des Moines Creeks

    This document is an agenda for a Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting held on February 19, 2002, at the Department of Ecology in Bellevue, Washington. The meeting covered technical modeling and water flow topics for three local waterways — Walker Creek, Miller Creek, and Des Moines Creek — including reviews of land cover tables, groundwater routing, and calibration. General topics such as water quality monitoring, channel hydraulics, and embankment modeling were also on the agenda.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin Plan, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-19

    Exhibit 730: Handwritten Meeting Notes — Embankment Model, Fill Modeling, Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines County Monitoring

    Handwritten meeting notes dated February 19, 2002, AR 026595–026597, attended by Pony Ellingson, Joe Brascher, Paul Fendt, Keith Smith, Felix Kristandovitch, Nick Stackellburg, Kelly Whiting, Ray Helwig, and Ed Abbasi. Topics include embankment model (Figure 5-4, Appendix B, Slice I model, MSE wall, infinite permeability assumption, coarse fill), fill modeling footprint area with surface groundwater
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Fill Dirt, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin PlanFolderBox 10
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 387: Vacca Farm & West Side Field Observations Jan–Feb 2002

    These are handwritten field observation notes dated January 31, 2002, documenting wetland and upland buffer conditions near Miller Creek and Vacca Farm, including plant communities, wetland boundaries, and buffer zones. The notes reference site observations about existing wetland conditions, vegetation types (including cattails, alder, sedge, and Phalaris), and questions about the extent of wetland fill and excavation. The observations appear to relate to an environmental review of proposed land use changes adjacent to Miller Creek, with reference to an upland buffer plan (STA-7805).
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-31

    EXH E: Photos Vacca Farm — January 31, 2002

    This document, labeled Exhibit E, contains photographs taken on January 31, 2002 of the Vacca Farm site, showing various land features including areas designated as Prior Converted Cropland, farmed wetlands, and Wetland A1. The photos document the site's vegetation and water features, including a close-up of wetland plants and a view of Miller Creek looking west across Wetland A1. The images appear to be part of an environmental or land-use assessment record related to the Vacca Farm property near Des Moines Way.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Des Moines, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-31

    EXH AR053382: Vacca Farm and West Side Observations – Handwritten Field Notes, January 31, 2002

    Handwritten field observation notes by R. Azous (Azous Exhibit 387, dated 2-19-02) transmitted via fax from Helsell Fetterman LLP on 02-19-2002, documenting site visits to Vacca Farm and West Side areas adjacent to Miller Creek and STIA. Notes cover wetland conditions, plant communities (cattail, alder, Juncus, Phalaris, Sparganium, sedge), upland buffer zones, NRM planting plan
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 22

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 26
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V