Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMiller Creek(260)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-19

    Exhibit 730: Handwritten Meeting Notes — Embankment Model, Fill Modeling, Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines County Monitoring

    Handwritten meeting notes dated February 19, 2002, AR 026595–026597, attended by Pony Ellingson, Joe Brascher, Paul Fendt, Keith Smith, Felix Kristandovitch, Nick Stackellburg, Kelly Whiting, Ray Helwig, and Ed Abbasi. Topics include embankment model (Figure 5-4, Appendix B, Slice I model, MSE wall, infinite permeability assumption, coarse fill), fill modeling footprint area with surface groundwater
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Fill Dirt, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin Plan
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 459: Proposed Agenda Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting – Walker, Miller, Des Moines Creeks

    This document is an agenda for a Low Streamflow Analysis Meeting held on February 19, 2002, at the Department of Ecology in Bellevue, Washington. The meeting covered technical modeling and water flow topics for three local waterways — Walker Creek, Miller Creek, and Des Moines Creek — including reviews of land cover tables, groundwater routing, and calibration. General topics such as water quality monitoring, channel hydraulics, and embankment modeling were also on the agenda.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Walker Creek Basin Plan, Water Quality
  • 2002-02-19

    EXH 387: Vacca Farm & West Side Field Observations Jan–Feb 2002

    These are handwritten field observation notes dated January 31, 2002, documenting wetland and upland buffer conditions near Miller Creek and Vacca Farm, including plant communities, wetland boundaries, and buffer zones. The notes reference site observations about existing wetland conditions, vegetation types (including cattails, alder, sedge, and Phalaris), and questions about the extent of wetland fill and excavation. The observations appear to relate to an environmental review of proposed land use changes adjacent to Miller Creek, with reference to an upland buffer plan (STA-7805).
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-31

    EXH E: Photos Vacca Farm — January 31, 2002

    This document, labeled Exhibit E, contains photographs taken on January 31, 2002 of the Vacca Farm site, showing various land features including areas designated as Prior Converted Cropland, farmed wetlands, and Wetland A1. The photos document the site's vegetation and water features, including a close-up of wetland plants and a view of Miller Creek looking west across Wetland A1. The images appear to be part of an environmental or land-use assessment record related to the Vacca Farm property near Des Moines Way.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Des Moines, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-31

    EXH AR053382: Vacca Farm and West Side Observations – Handwritten Field Notes, January 31, 2002

    Handwritten field observation notes by R. Azous (Azous Exhibit 387, dated 2-19-02) transmitted via fax from Helsell Fetterman LLP on 02-19-2002, documenting site visits to Vacca Farm and West Side areas adjacent to Miller Creek and STIA. Notes cover wetland conditions, plant communities (cattail, alder, Juncus, Phalaris, Sparganium, sedge), upland buffer zones, NRM planting plan
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Handwritten Notes, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 411: NHC Letter to US Army Corps Engineers Low Streamflow Analysis Miller Creek Walker Creek Des Moines Creek

    A January 2002 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis related to Sea-Tac Airport's third runway development. The letter identifies critical flaws in hydrologic modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, including double-counting of groundwater discharges, flawed seepage modeling methodology, and failure to account for construction impacts on stream low flows. The consultants argue these errors cause the Port to substantially underestimate the project's negative impacts on local stream flows.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 248: NHC Letter to USACE — ACC Technical Review Low Streamflow Analysis, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A January 2002 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis for SeaTac Airport, identifying serious modeling errors that led to underestimated impacts on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. Key flaws include double-counting of groundwater discharges in the Miller Creek model, inconsistent methodology for assessing embankment seepage, and failure to account for updated construction methods. The letter was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-21

    EXH AR031548: Wetlands on STIA North End Properties — Supplemental Information Regarding Wetlands (Parametrix Technical Memorandum)

    Parametrix, Inc. technical memorandum dated January 21, 2002, from Jim Kelley, Ph.D., to Muffy Walker, US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch, regarding Port Of Seattle permit 1996-4-02325 (Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update). Provides supplemental information on wetland impacts in upper watersheds of Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek, including percent loss of
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan
  • 2002-01-19

    EXH 389: Declaration Amanda Azous Supporting ACC Reply Motion for Stay

    A wetlands scientist named Amanda Azous filed a legal declaration opposing the Port of Seattle's airport expansion project, arguing that filling approximately 2.8 acres of wetlands near Miller Creek would cause serious and irreversible environmental harm. She contends that the Port's mitigation plan—relying on stormwater management, embankment walls, and upland planting—cannot adequately replace the lost wetland functions, particularly the critical water and nutrient flows these wetlands provide to the broader Miller Creek watershed. The declaration was submitted in support of the Airport Communities Coalition's motion to halt the project before the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board in 2001.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-14

    EXH AR021854: Helsell Fetterman to Army Corps Transmitting GeoSyntec Comments on Hart Crowser Geotechnical Summary RP, Third Runway Embankment Fill and West MSE Wall, STIA

    A January 2002 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises concerns with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers about the Port of Seattle's revised construction plans for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. The Port switched from an in-place ground improvement approach to excavating up to three million cubic yards of material beneath the proposed retaining wall, a major change that critics argue could significantly harm Miller Creek and adjacent wetlands. Attached technical comments from GeoSyntec Consultants also identify deficiencies in the Port's geotechnical report and argue the changes undermine the Port's Clean Water Act Section 404 permit application.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 … Page 26
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Des Moines Creek West Tract C Regular Meeting 12 Sep 2024 Agenda Pdf" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V