Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR026603: Letter USFWS to James M. Lynch — Monitoring Plan Embankment Fill Seepage, Master Plan Update ESA Consultation (1-3-00-F-1420)

    This December 2001 letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Western Washington office provides detailed comments on a Monitoring Plan for Embankment Fill Seepage related to a Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, reviewed under the Endangered Species Act. The agency requested key revisions, including monitoring both seepage quality and quantity, beginning monitoring when seepage first occurs rather than after embankment completion, and ensuring groundwater wells are considered as a monitoring pathway. The letter also clarified that any exceedances of water quality criteria must be reported promptly, and that the Federal Aviation Administration—not the Port—would be responsible for reinitiating formal consultation.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Master Plan, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR053223: Effect of Shear Modulus on Deformations and Reinforcing Stresses of MSE Walls — Third Runway Project

    Memorandum dated December 20, 2001 from Michael Bailey, P.E. and Reda A. Mikhail, P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E. of HNTB Corporation regarding AR053223, project 4798-40. Analyzes sensitivity of MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall design to variations in soil shear modulus under dynamic/seismic loading for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport,
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR031428: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Comments on Monitoring Plan for Embankment Fill Seepage, Master Plan Update ESA Consultation (1-3-00-F-1420)

    Letter dated December 20, 2001 from Ken S. Berg, Manager, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service) to James M. Lynch, Stoel Rives LLP, providing 20 numbered comments on the Monitoring Plan for Embankment Fill Seepage submitted August 10, 2001 under Endangered Species Act consultation 1-3-00-F-1420 (Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update).
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac Airport, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-20

    Exhibit 40: Declaration of Kelly Whiting, PCHB No. 01-133, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Kelly Whiting, Senior Engineer at King County Department of Natural Resources, filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-133) in Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Whiting reviewed the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update Improvements at
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-12-19

    EXH AR017502: Guidance for the Use of Tables — Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and PQL Comparisons to Method B Cleanup Levels

    Ecology guidance document (AR017502, Part II of IV) explaining how to use PQL and MDL tables under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). Covers Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and comparisons to MTCA Method B cleanup levels for water and soil. Describes analytical methods from US EPA SW-846 (3000, 7000, 8000-8100, 8310,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Scientific Measurement, WAC
  • 2001-12-19

    EXH AR028816: Summary Statement for Deposition Publication — Peter Kmet, ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Summary statement for deposition publication submitted pursuant to Order Granting Appellant’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses dated March 19, 2002, in ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Deponent Peter Kmet, P.E., Senior Environmental Engineer, Toxics Cleanup Program, DOE Headquarters Policy
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-19

    Exhibit 2057: Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan — 401 Water Quality Certification Conditions Matrix

    Email from Jim Kelley (Parametrix, Inc.) to Ann Kenny dated December 19, 2001, transmitting a matrix document summarizing changes made to the Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (NRMP) to comply with Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 (401 Certification) issued September 21, 2001. The attached matrix details resolutions for required mitigation conditions including: monitoring duration
    TagsACC, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-18

    Exhibit 141: Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (amended-1), issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to the Port Of Seattle on September 21, 2001, in case PCHB 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed the motion; Board members Kaleen Cottingham and Robert V. Jensen heard
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-18

    Exhibit 228: NHC Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Identifying Port Of Seattle Document Inconsistencies in SMP and NRMP for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update

    A December 2001 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, identifies inconsistencies in the Port of Seattle's stormwater management plans for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The letter argues that the Port's hydrologic modeling failed to account for the planned commercial redevelopment of borrow pit areas by 2006, and that the Natural Resource Mitigation Plan reverted to an outdated stormwater approach relying on regional detention facilities to be built by others. These gaps, the consultants contend, prevent a full assessment of the airport Master Plan Update's environmental impacts.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-18

    EXH AR017596: NHC Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers re Port Of Seattle Document Inconsistencies in SMP for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC), retained by ACC (Airport Communities Coalition), wrote to Colonel Ralph H. Graves, Ms. Muffy Walker, and Ms. Gail Terzi of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District (Corps Ref. No. 1996-4-02325) identifying inconsistencies in Port Of Seattle proposals for site development and stormwater management at Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea-Tac Airport Noise Monitoring System Report: January–February 1980" — , 1980

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V