Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-10

    PCHB Doc 5830: Ecology Response to Motion to Intervene from CASE

    Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology concurs with Port Of Seattle’s requested limits on intervention and does not oppose CASE’s motion. Filed December 10, 2001; signed
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-10

    EXH AR005834: Notice of Association of Counsel — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Notice of Association of Counsel filed December 10, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Jeff B. Kray, Assistant Attorney General, Ecology Division, associates with Joan M. Marchioro and Thomas J. Young to represent the Washington State Department of Ecology. Appellant is Airport Communities Coalition; respondents are State
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-07

    EXH 450: Ecology Draft Memo Requesting Ching-Pi Wang Review Third Runway Embankment Seepage Groundwater Monitoring Plan

    In December 2001, Ann Kenny of the Washington Department of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office drafted a memo requesting that hydrogeologist Ching-Pi Wang review a groundwater and seepage monitoring plan submitted by the Port of Seattle for the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The plan, titled 'Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan,' was submitted on November 16, 2001, and required expert review before Ecology could approve it. Wang was asked to provide written comments on the plan's adequacy and any recommended changes by January 18, 2002.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-06

    EXH AR005836: Port Of Seattle’s Response to Motion to Intervene from CASE, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle response filed December 6, 2001 to motion to intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port does not oppose CASE intervention if limited under WAC 371-08-420(1): CASE barred from raising new
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-05

    EXH AR005840: ACC’s Response to CASE’s Motion to Intervene, PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) Motion to Intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, filed December 5, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. ACC does not object to CASE’s intervention but agrees it should not interfere with ACC’s pending Motion for Stay. Respondents are State
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-05

    EXH AR030790: Ecology Letter to San Juan County — Ayer Property Wetland Conversion Concerns, Orcas Island

    Letter dated December 5, 2001 from Sarah Suggs, Wetlands Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office) to Grant Beck, Director, San Juan County Permit Center, regarding the Ayer property wetland restoration proposal on Orcas Island. Ecology characterizes the proposal as a wetland conversion (not restoration) under Chapter 90.48 RCW and Chapter 173-201A WAC,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCW, SEPA, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR018164: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Port Of Seattle STIA Master Plan Update

    Parametrix, Inc. December 2001 report for Port Of Seattle on Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements. Document AR018164, Exhibit 140. Covers HSPF model calibration, embankment modeling, non-hydrologic impacts (cessation of water withdrawals, removal of septic tank discharges), HEC-RAS modeling, vault
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SAMP, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 273: Low Streamflow Analysis — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements

    This technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in three creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks) to assess the potential impacts of airport construction projects on summer water flows. Using a 47-year record of streamflow data and computer modeling tools, analysts determined target streamflow levels for each creek and evaluated how proposed runway and infrastructure improvements might affect seasonal low-flow periods critical to salmon habitat. The study found existing summer low streamflow targets of 0.33 cfs for Des Moines Creek, 0.77 cfs for Walker Creek, and 0.73 cfs for Miller Creek, which were used to guide mitigation planning.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 297: Low Streamflow Analysis Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2001 report, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. and several partner firms for the Port of Seattle, analyzes low streamflow conditions and proposes a Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility as part of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. The study examines how planned airport expansion may affect seasonal low-flow water resources in the surrounding area and outlines mitigation measures to offset those impacts. The report is organized across multiple volumes, with Volume 1 containing the main text and Appendices B through J.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR017886: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements

    Report prepared by Parametrix, Inc. with Aqua Terra Consultants, Earth Tech, Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, HNTB, and Pacific Groundwater Group for Port Of Seattle regarding Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. Analyzes summer low streamflow impacts to Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek from planned airport projects and proposes an offset facility using underground
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Most complaints against Boeing, FAA go nowhere, frustrating whistleblowers" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V