Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-28

    EXH AR024306: ACC Review Letter — Nov 2001 NRMP Wetland Mitigation Inadequacies, STIA Third Runway

    A December 2001 letter from Azous Environmental Sciences challenges the Port of Seattle's wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction project, arguing that the plan inadequately offsets environmental damage to wetlands and streams. The letter contends that the Port has misclassified wetland 'enhancement' work at Vacca Farm as 'restoration,' inflating mitigation credits, and that the overall plan fails to meet no-net-loss standards required under Army Corps of Engineers regulations.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-12-28

    EXH AR027061: Ecology Acknowledgment of Waste Discharge Permit Application WA-002465-1 and Port Of Seattle NPDES Permit Renewal Submission for Sea-Tac Airport

    AR027061. Two letters dated December 2001 regarding NPDES Permit WA-002465-1 for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. First: Washington Department of Ecology (Tricia Miller, Permit Coordinator, Northwest Regional Office) acknowledges receipt of a waste discharge permit application from Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities, Port Of Seattle, received December 21, 2001; contact Ed Abbasi at (425) 649-7227. Second
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 10
  • 2001-12-27

    Exhibit 2049: Port Of Seattle Construction Stormwater Monitoring Report Letter — STIA Water Quality Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Letter dated December 27, 2001 from Keith R. Smith, Water Resources Manager at Port Of Seattle Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, to Ms. Ann Kenny at Washington State Department of Ecology (Bellevue, WA 98088-5452), transmitting construction stormwater monitoring reports for September, October, and November 2001 under Section K.6 of Water Quality Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and NPDES
    TagsACC, Construction, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 12
  • 2001-12-26

    EXH 295: ACC Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6; Objections and Responses

    The Port of Seattle submitted formal objections and responses to interrogatories filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, related to a legal dispute over the Port's Third Runway Project. The case centered on the Department of Ecology's water quality certification issued under federal Clean Water Act Section 401. The document outlines the legal procedures governing the exchange of information between the parties during the hearing process.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-12-26

    EXH 407: ACC Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6; Objections and Responses

    This document contains the Port of Seattle's formal objections and responses to interrogatories and requests for production filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board (Case No. 01-160). The Port identifies over a dozen expert witnesses it intends to call, including specialists in geotechnical engineering, toxicology, hydrology, and groundwater science from firms such as Parametrix, Inc., Hart Crowser, and ENSR Toxicology. The case centers on environmental and pollution concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport operations.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-12-26

    Exhibit 196: ACC’s Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6 to Port Of Seattle and Port Of Seattle’s Objections and Responses Thereto

    This legal document contains the Port of Seattle's responses to interrogatories filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board. The Port identifies expert witnesses expected to testify on topics including contaminated site cleanup, stormwater quality, wetland mitigation, and environmental review under SEPA and NEPA for Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan Update projects. The document outlines each expert's anticipated testimony and the basis for their opinions in connection with Clean Water Act permit requirements.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-22

    PCHB Doc 5791: ACC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Absence of Water Right

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion for partial summary judgment filed in PCHB No. 01-160 against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, arguing the Section 401 Certification should be invalidated because the Port lacks a water right to permanently mitigate low-flow impacts of the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Cites PCHB December
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2001-12-21

    EXH AR025100: Deposition Edward O’Brien — ACC v. Ecology & Port, PCHB No. 01-133

    This document is a deposition of Edward O'Brien, taken on December 21, 2001, as part of a Pollution Control Hearings Board case in Washington State involving the Airport Communities Coalition challenging the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. O'Brien discusses stormwater management techniques, including infiltration facilities, which can be used to treat stormwater quality and mitigate low-flow impacts on surface water systems connected to groundwater. He explains that while infiltration can delay and filter stormwater flows through soil profiles, precise control over timing and flow rates is limited and depends on site-specific soil and hydrological conditions.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 10
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR026603: Letter USFWS to James M. Lynch — Monitoring Plan Embankment Fill Seepage, Master Plan Update ESA Consultation (1-3-00-F-1420)

    This December 2001 letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Western Washington office provides detailed comments on a Monitoring Plan for Embankment Fill Seepage related to a Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update, reviewed under the Endangered Species Act. The agency requested key revisions, including monitoring both seepage quality and quantity, beginning monitoring when seepage first occurs rather than after embankment completion, and ensuring groundwater wells are considered as a monitoring pathway. The letter also clarified that any exceedances of water quality criteria must be reported promptly, and that the Federal Aviation Administration—not the Port—would be responsible for reinitiating formal consultation.
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Master Plan, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-12-20

    EXH AR053223: Effect of Shear Modulus on Deformations and Reinforcing Stresses of MSE Walls — Third Runway Project

    Memorandum dated December 20, 2001 from Michael Bailey, P.E. and Reda A. Mikhail, P.E. of Hart Crowser, Inc. to Jim Thomson, P.E. of HNTB Corporation regarding AR053223, project 4798-40. Analyzes sensitivity of MSE (Mechanically Stabilized Earth) wall design to variations in soil shear modulus under dynamic/seismic loading for the Third Runway Project at Sea-Tac Airport,
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 22

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Final Highline Forum agenda: Noise Programs/NextGen Briefing & Highline Forum Reorganization" — , 2017

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V