Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAcademic Journals(54)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2008-04-01

    Monetary value of undisturbed sleep

    A Swiss study interviewed 67 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who used CPAP therapy to estimate the monetary value people place on undisturbed sleep. Patients valued a good night's sleep at an average of about 70 Swiss francs per night, and after adjusting for the difference in severity between sleep apnea and traffic noise disturbance, the researchers estimated that noise-free sleep is worth roughly 7 to 24 Swiss francs per person per night. The findings suggest that sleep disrupted by road traffic noise carries a significant monetary cost that should be factored into airport and transportation noise policy decisions.
    TagsAcademic Journals, Health, Noise, Noise PollutionFolderStudies
  • 2003-04-18

    The Effects of Aircraft Noise and Road Traffic Noise on Reading Comprehension and Attention: The Ranch Study

    A European study called RANCH examined how aircraft and road traffic noise affects reading comprehension and attention in nearly 3,000 children aged 9-10 in the UK, Netherlands, and Spain. Results showed that higher aircraft noise exposure was significantly linked to poorer reading comprehension, while road traffic noise showed no such effect; neither type of noise impacted sustained attention. The findings suggest aircraft noise poses a greater risk to children's cognitive development than road traffic noise, with implications for school siting and noise exposure policies near airports.
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsAcademic Journals, aircraft, airport issues, Airport Noise Report, Aviation Noise & Emissions SymposiumFolderStudies
  • 2002-11-05

    EXH AR14000: Wetlands and Urbanization — Implications for the Future

    Book edited by Amanda L. Azous (Azous Environmental Sciences) and Richard R. Horner (Research Associate Professor, Landscape Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle), published by Lewis Publishers (Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C.). Title: ‘Wetlands and Urbanization: Implications for the Future.’ Administrative Record document AR 014000. Covers wetland ecology, urban
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, University Of Washington, Water QualityFolderBox 07
  • 2002-10-23

    EXH AR039925: Watershed Determinants of Ecosystem Functioning

    Academic paper by Richard R. Horner, Derek B. Booth, Amanda Azous, and Christopher W. May (University of Washington Center for Urban Water Resources Management) on watershed determinants of ecosystem functioning in the Puget Sound Basin. Studies 31 stream reaches on 19 low-order streams and 19 palustrine wetlands over multi-year periods, examining effects of urbanization and
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Salmon, Water QualityFolderBox 17
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR026434: Highway Runoff Chemistry Hydrology Residence Time Non-Equilibrium Partitioning Heavy Metals Treatment

    This research study examines how heavy metals in highway stormwater runoff behave as water flows off pavement, finding that most heavy metals remain dissolved rather than attaching to solid particles due to low alkalinity and short travel times on the pavement surface. The study, conducted on Interstate 75 in Cincinnati over two years, explores how best management practices like detention basins or infiltration trenches could be used to capture these metals before they reach receiving waters.
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Clean Water Act, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2002-10-22

    Exhibit 2233: Sources of Urban Stormwater Pollutants Defined in Wisconsin

    Technical Note #15 from Watershed Protection Techniques, I(1):30-31, covering sources of urban stormwater pollutants as defined in Wisconsin. Based on Bannerman, R., D. Owens, R. Dodds, and N. Hornewer (1993) study published in Water Science & Technology (28):3-5, pp. 241-259. Over 300 runoff samples collected from 46 micro-sites in two watersheds. Documents pollutant concentrations of
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Environment, pollution, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2001-07-01

    Airports and Cities: Can they coexist?

    This 2001 World Watch article by Ed Ayres examines the growing conflict between expanding airports and the cities surrounding them, highlighting the serious health, environmental, and noise impacts on nearby residents. It challenges the conventional mindset of simply building more airport capacity, noting that a 747 takeoff produces as much air pollution in two minutes as 3,000 cars, and that people living near airports face higher rates of illness and psychological harm. The article explores innovative design alternatives, such as inclined runways and energy-recovering landing systems, as more sustainable solutions to meeting rising air travel demand.
    CategoriesChange The Culture TagsAcademic Journals, Airport Expansion, Aviation Emissions, Noise PollutionFolderCities
  • 2000-08-06

    EXH AR034780: Society of Wetland Scientists Position Paper on the Definition of Wetland Restoration

    Society of Wetland Scientists (SWS) position paper dated August 6, 2000 defining ‘wetland restoration’ as actions taken in a converted or degraded natural wetland that reestablish ecological processes, functions, and biotic/abiotic linkages leading to a persistent, resilient system integrated within its landscape. The paper covers five key scientific considerations: reinstatement of driving ecological processes (hydrology,
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 14
  • 2000-04-01

    EXH AR044580: Critical Review of the Use of Bioconcentration Factors for Hazard Classification of Metals and Metal Compounds

    Report prepared by Kevin V. Brix and David K. DeForest of Parametrix, Inc. for the International Lead Zinc Research Organization, International Copper Association, and Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association (NiPERA), April 2000. Reviews bioconcentration factors (BCFs) for metals including cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc in aquatic organisms (fish, bivalves, invertebrates, algae, diatoms). Covers
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Environment, EPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 18
  • 1995-01-01

    EXH AR037648: Toxicity of Aircraft De-Icer and Anti-Icer Solutions to Aquatic Organisms

    Peer-reviewed article by S. Ian Hartwell, David M. Jordahl, Joyce E. Evans, and Eric B. May (Maryland Department of Natural Resources) published in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 14, No. 8, 1995. Study assesses toxicity of ethylene glycol-based de-icer and propylene glycol-based anti-icer solutions from Baltimore-Washington International Airport (BWI) to aquatic organisms including fathead minnow
    TagsAcademic Journals, ACC, Deicing, Environment, Ethylene Gycol, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 15

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V