Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1067)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-02-28

    EXH AR024619: Draft Memo Range-Finding Water-Effect Ratios Miller & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from Parametrix, Inc. outlines a scope and budget for range-finding Water-Effect Ratio (WER) studies using receiving water from Miller and Des Moines Creeks, intended to help determine whether copper discharge standards at a Port facility could be adjusted through site-specific water quality criteria. The studies involve acute toxicity tests comparing copper-spiked site water to copper-spiked laboratory water, with estimated costs ranging from $2,110 for one site to $2,650 for two sites. Results from earlier 1999 range-finding tests suggested WERs high enough to potentially justify more definitive studies, but new tests without mixing zone assumptions were recommended to better assess achievable permit limits.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-17

    Exhibit 173: Email — Meeting with Jim Kelley (Parametrix) Re Third Runway Public Comments on Wetland Mitigation Ratios

    Email from Erik Stockdale (Ecology NWRO) to Raymond Hellwig and Tom Luster, dated February 17, 2000, summarizing a February 15 meeting with Jim Kelley of Parametrix regarding public comments on the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project (AR 018438–018440, Exhibit 173). Issues raised by commenters Sarah Cooke and Andy Castelle concerned incorrect wetland mitigation ratio calculations
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-02-16

    Exhibit 230: Email from Bill Rozeboom (Northwest Hydraulic Consultants) to Peter Eglick Re: IWS Lagoon Expansion and Fitzpatrick Email Analysis

    A February 2000 email from hydraulic consultant Bill Rozeboom argues that the proposed expansion of Sea-Tac Airport's Integrated Wetlands System (IWS) lagoon—tripling its storage capacity—is primarily driven by the airport's Master Plan Improvements, including the proposed third runway, rather than being a routine water quality project. Rozeboom notes that the planned increase in impervious drainage area (roughly 521 additional acres) closely mirrors the proposed increase in IWS storage volume, supporting his conclusion that the third runway is the primary driver of the expansion. He also raises concerns that the environmental documents fail to adequately assess the impact of large-scale out-of-basin water transfers on aquifer recharge and stream base flows in the Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek basins.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-02-14

    EXH AR024917: Draft Memo — Site-Specific WQC Status Update, Copper, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 draft memorandum from environmental consultants to Keith Smith summarizes efforts to develop a site-specific water quality criterion for copper in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Seattle-Tacoma Airport, in anticipation of stormwater runoff from a proposed third runway. The memo outlines two technical approaches—the Water-Effect Ratio (WER) and the site-specific metals translator—for potentially raising copper discharge permit limits, and describes toxicity screening and range-finding studies conducted in 1999. The phased study approach was designed to avoid unnecessary costs if the WER method proved infeasible or if the Washington Department of Ecology would not permit its use in adjusting permit limits.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-14

    EXH AR024622: Draft Memo — Site-Specific WQC Copper Status Update, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A February 2000 internal draft memorandum from environmental consultants to Port of Seattle staff summarizes efforts to develop a site-specific water quality criterion for copper in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, in connection with stormwater runoff anticipated from a proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. The memo evaluates two technical approaches—the Water-Effect Ratio (WER) and the site-specific metals translator—for potentially raising copper discharge permit limits, and outlines initial toxicity screening and range-finding study results. It also describes ongoing negotiations with the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding unresolved issues such as mixing zones, AKART requirements, and critical sampling conditions.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-02-08

    Exhibit 82: Email Chain RE Fill Criteria for the Third Runway — Ecology/Port Of Seattle Financial Arrangement Discussion

    Email chain dated February 8, 2000 among Washington State Department of Ecology staff (Roger Nye, Raymond Hellwig, Steve Alexander) regarding fill criteria compliance for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Roger Nye describes the 401/404 permit fill acceptance policy developed with Port Of Seattle governing contaminant criteria for borrow sources used in Third Runway construction
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-01-28

    EXH AR018446: Forwarded Email re SEPA Register Entry — Third Runway Wetland Fill and Temporary Construction at Sea-Tac Airport

    Internal forwarded email chain dated January 28, 2000, from Erik Stockdale to Tom Luster (copying Sarah Suggs original), forwarding a SEPA register entry (Ecology File# 200000524, LA File# 00-02) for an Addendum EIS issued by the Port of Seattle as lead agency. The addendum EIS covers Third Runway Wetland Fill and Temporary Construction at Sea-Tac
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-01-24

    EXH AR44097: Port Of Seattle SEPA Addendum — Third Parallel Runway Wetland Fill and Temporary Construction-Only Interchange at SR 509/South 176th Street

    SEPA Addendum dated January 24, 2000, Port Of Seattle, POS SEPA No. 00-02, addressing modifications to the Master Plan Update Development Actions for the Third Parallel Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Addendum covers: (1) increased wetland acreage affected by the project, revised from 12.23 acres to 18.33 acres, with 15.41 acres affected by the runway
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA, SR509, Third RunwayFolderBox 18
  • 2000-01-03

    EXH AR033704: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster RE: Des Moines Creek Fish and Third Runway Stormwater Review

    Email dated January 3, 2000 from Raymond Hellwig (WQ Program) to Tom Luster (SEA Program), cc’d to Ron Langley, Dave Garland, Erik Stockdale, Gordon White, Jeannie Summerhays, John Glynn, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Paula Ehlers, Megan White, and Dan Silver. Responds to Luster’s December 23, 1999 message regarding premature death of Coho salmon in Des Moines Creek
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2000-01-03

    Exhibit 220: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster re Des Moines Creek Fish and POS Third Runway Stormwater Review

    A January 2000 internal email from EPA's Raymond Hellwig to Tom Luster addresses concerns about premature deaths of Coho salmon in Des Moines Creek near Sea-Tac Airport, in the context of the proposed third runway project. The email clarifies that stormwater discharge regulation will be handled through NPDES permits rather than Section 401 Water Quality Certifications, as the NPDES permit provides the only mechanism for ongoing regulatory oversight under the Clean Water Act. Hellwig directs Luster to defer to the Water Quality Program on stormwater issues and to stop raising the 401 Certification as an alternative avenue for addressing water quality standards.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 … Page 107
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH 355: Decl. Dr. Peter Willing Support ACC Motion for Stay (PCHB Nos. 01-133, 01-160)" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V