Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-09

    PCHB AR 002066: ACC and CASE Prehearing Briefs — Table of Contents

    Table of contents for the prehearing briefs filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), received March 9, 2002. Document challenges Ecology’s issuance of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and CZMA certification for the Port Of Seattle’s Third Runway project, raising issues
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-08

    PCHB Doc 02777: Declaration of Ray Hellwig — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Ray Hellwig, Regional Director at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, filed in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Hellwig attests to receiving a transcribed voicemail from Tom Luster on or about September 17, 2001, in which Luster disclosed he
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Direct Testimony of Katie Walter on Behalf of Ecology — Port Of Seattle Third Runway Natural Resources Mitigation Plan Review

    Direct testimony of Katie Walter, senior principal wetland scientist at Shannon & Wilson, Inc., submitted on behalf of the Washington State Department of Ecology in PCHB No. 01-160. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE); respondents are Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Walter reviews the Port’s Natural Resources Mitigation Plan
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 03040: Direct Testimony of Chung Ki Yee on Behalf of Ecology — ACC/CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Chung Ki Yee, Environmental Engineer 3 in the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Yee describes deriving fill criteria for the Port Of Seattle Third
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR003129: ACC and CASE Opposition to Ecology’s Motion in Limine re WAC 371-08-475(7)

    Opposition brief filed March 7, 2002, by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) to the Department of Ecology’s motion in limine in PCHB No. 01-160, arguing that WAC 371-08-475(7) (Former Employee as Expert Witness) does not bar testimony by Thomas R. Luster. ACC argues Luster was reassigned from the Port of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR003136: Declaration of Peter J. Eglick in Support of Opposition by ACC and CASE to Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re WAC 371-08-475(7)

    Declaration by Peter J. Eglick, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed March 7, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Filed in opposition to Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine regarding WAC 371-08-475(7). Attaches Exhibit A (deposition transcript of Thomas Fitzsimmons, January 18, 2002,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Dr. William A. Stubblefield, Ph.D.

    Prefiled direct testimony of Dr. William A. Stubblefield, Ph.D., filed March 7, 2002, in PCHB case 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers water quality standards, Ambient Water
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 01-160: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle — Department of Ecology’s Pre-Filed Direct Testimony

    Department of Ecology’s Pre-Filed Direct Testimony in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, filed via FedEx on 2002-03-07 from Joan Marchioro at Attorney General/Ecology Division, Olympia WA 98502, to Rachel Paschal Osborn, Attorney at Law, Spokane WA 99201. Administrative Record number AR 015577. Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) proceeding
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR016335: Pre-Filed Direct Testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. — PCHB 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pre-filed direct testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. AR 016335. Testimony covers stormwater impacts from the MPU (Master Plan Update) improvements at Sea-Tac Airport, including
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 002914: Direct Testimony of Ann Kenny on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Ann Kenny, Environmental Planner 4 at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office (NWRO), submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case No. 01-160. Covers Ecology’s review of Port Of Seattle’s Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements under Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification and Coastal Zone Management
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2021 1208 POS PortMap2" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V