Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH AR003201: Erratum to Respondent Port Of Seattle’s List of Witnesses and Exhibits

    Erratum filed by Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) correcting Item No. 136 in the witness and exhibit list. Corrects dates for Parametrix, Inc. draft memorandum to Port Of Seattle project files titled ‘Range-finding water-effect ratio results’ (authors L. Logan and D.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc AR003205: Port Of Seattle Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum supporting its motion for partial summary judgment on Issue No. 14 (‘Did Ecology and the Port comply with SEPA?’) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) lacks
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc 3214: Declaration of Roger A. Pearce Supporting Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for Port Of Seattle, filed February 25, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue. Identifies and authenticates three exhibits from the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of William Rozeboom, Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony of William Rozeboom P.E., Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002, Binder #3 of 4. Document received by Environmental Hearings Office. The index references testimony of
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB No. 01-160: ACC Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Peter Willing and Greg Wingard, Binder 4 of 4

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing and Greg Wingard submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, filed February 22, 2002 with the Environmental Hearings Office. Binder 4 of 4 in a four-binder set. The full index (Binder 1)
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR015139: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Peter Willing on Behalf of ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Peter Willing submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Willing holds MS and PhD from Cornell University Department of Natural Resources, specializing in land use and water quality of lakes
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR003520: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony with Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed February 22, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery by special messenger of ACC’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witnesses Amanda Azous, Dyanne Sheldon, John Strand, Peter Willing, Thomas Luster,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-22

    Exhibit 719: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Monitoring Report — Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Airport, Permit WA-002465-1, December 2001

    NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) filed by Port Of Seattle for Sea-Tac Airport under permit WA-002465-1, discharge number 001, monitoring period December 1–31, 2001. Parameters reported include flow (max 4,500–4,800 gpm), pH, oil and grease, TSS, BOD5, total glycols, TPH, fecal coliform, priority pollutants, and SCAN results. Signed by Michael D. Feldman, Director of Aviation
    TagsACC, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony submitted to the Environmental Hearings Office on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) by Dr. Malcolm Leytham, Thomas Luster, and Sally Nelson in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Binder #2 of 4 in a four-binder set. Index references Binder #1
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Ecology Focus Model Toxic Control Act Cleanup Regulation Process for Cleanup of Hazardous Waste Sites May 2001_0001" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V