Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(1845)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 015773: ACC v. DOE/PORT — Certificate of Service, Prefiled Testimony, PCHB No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed March 7, 2002 by Holly Simmelink, Certified PLS, of Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160, Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Certifies service of prefiled testimony of 16 witnesses: Michael
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-06

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Third Pre-Hearing Order — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Third Pre-Hearing Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Issued following a March 6, 2002 pre-hearing conference presided over by Kaleen Cottingham with Board member Bill Lynch and
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-05

    PCHB Doc 3146: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160

    Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster responds to Ecology’s Motion in Limine seeking to strike portions of his pre-filed testimony on grounds he is serving as an expert witness. Luster asserts
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003184: Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle — PCHB No. 01-160

    Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Marten Brown Inc. withdraws as counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle and is replaced by Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC, with Gillis E. Reavis (WSBA #21451) signing for both
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003187: Port Of Seattle Joinder in Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475 (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, WAC
  • 2002-03-04

    PCHB Doc 002380: Order Denying Motion in Limine Re WAC 371-08-475 — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Denying Motion in Limine in case PCHB 01-160, filed March 4, 2002. Department of Ecology moved to strike pre-filed written direct testimony of Thomas R. Luster submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), citing WAC 371-08-475(7) prohibiting former department employees from appearing as expert witnesses in proceedings where they took
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-04

    EXH AR003176: Letter from Helsell Fetterman to PCHB Re Chess Clock Format, PCHB No. 01-160 ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Letter dated March 4, 2002 from Peter Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and Port of Seattle) regarding use of a chess clock format during hearing proceedings. Letter argues for a per-side rather than per-party chess clock
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-28

    EXH AR003195: Joint Status Report and Estimate of Time Needed for Hearing — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Joint Status Report filed February 28, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Appeal of Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-I) for Third Runway and Related Master Plan Updates. Parties report settlement is
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-28

    EXH AR003194: Erratum to Ecology’s Final List of Witnesses and Exhibits — Exhibit 240 (Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course Photographs)

    Erratum filed by Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Adds omitted Exhibit No. 240 — Photographs of Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course — to Ecology’s Final Witness and Exhibit
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-27

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. Patrick C. Lucia on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony of Dr. Patrick C. Lucia, Ph.D., submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 27, 2002. Filed with the Environmental Hearings Office as Supplemental Binder #1 of 1, AR 015511-015513. Case involves Sea-Tac Airport expansion
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 … Page 185
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Index to Box15" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V