Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(422)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 48: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Stormwater Management Plan Review for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director, King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport. The letter references
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 2040: King County Letter to Ecology Reviewing Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 12
  • 2000-10-24

    EXH AR029027: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 24, 2000

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations meeting held October 24, 2000, 1:30–5:00 PM. Attendees include representatives from King County (Kelly Whiting, Mark Lampard), AquaTerra (Joe Brascher), Earthtech (Rick Schaefer), Parametrix (Paul Fendt, Jim Dexter), HNTB (Alan Black), and Floyd
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2000-09-21

    EXH 239: Preliminary Comments Set 1 on Aug 2000 Stormwater Management Plan STIA Master Plan Update

    A September 2000 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious technical concerns about the Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway. The letter highlights findings from King County reviewers showing that multiple stormwater facilities in the plan were unverified, potentially infeasible, or unlikely to meet required flow control performance standards. The consultants argue that the review timeline was insufficient and that the Port of Seattle had a history of failing to deliver promised stormwater mitigation measures.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-21

    EXH AR018976: Preliminary Comments Set 1 on Aug 2000 STIA Stormwater Management Plan Master Plan Update

    In September 2000, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants submitted preliminary technical comments on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raising serious concerns about the adequacy of the Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway expansion. The letter highlights findings from King County's independent review, which identified numerous cases where proposed stormwater control facilities were unverified, infeasible, or unlikely to meet required flow control performance standards. The consultants warned that the compressed public review timeline was insufficient for thorough evaluation of the plan before Ecology's 401 Certification decision.
    TagsACC, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-09-15

    EXH AR026129: King County DNR Letter to Ecology — Comprehensive Stormwater Mgmt Plan STIA Master Plan Update

    In September 2000, King County's Department of Natural Resources provided a technical review of the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review found no fatal flaws in the plan's approach to meeting King County's stormwater standards, but identified inconsistencies in flow control calculations and water quality measures that needed to be resolved before final permitting. King County also emphasized the importance of rigorous erosion and sediment control during construction and recommended that Ecology and the Port establish a joint compliance team to oversee implementation of the complex, multi-year project.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-10

    Exhibit 119: Email Chain from Kelly Whiting Re: Landscape Management Plans and Metal Rooftop Stormwater Treatment at STIA

    Email chain dated August 10, 2000 from Kelly R. Whiting, PE (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resource Division, Drainage Services Section) to Louise Kulzer and Kate Rhoads, cc David Masters, regarding Landscape Management Plans and the POS-SMP proposed approach for dealing with metal roofs at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Whiting raises
    TagsACC, King County, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-07-30

    EXH AR017907: King County Drainage Services Email Chain on Copper Levels in STIA Runway Runoff and Water Quality BMPs

    Email chain dated July 30, 2000 from Kelly R. Whiting, PE, King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resource Division, Drainage Services Section, to David Masters and Tom Luster (WDOE), forwarding water quality specialist Kate Rhoads’ notes on copper (Cu) levels in Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) runway stormwater runoff. Whiting discusses KCSWDM (King
    TagsACC, King County, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-04-27

    Exhibit 109: Ecology Letter to Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Re: Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis Review

    Letter dated April 27, 2000 from Ann E. Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office), to William A. Rozeboom and K. Malcom Leytham of Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. Responds to their April 11, 2001 letter to Gordon White concerning Ecology’s review of Port Of Seattle’s December 2000 Low Streamflow Analysis.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 08
  • 2000-04-24

    EXH AR023713: Email Lindsey to Martha C. (Ecology) — Permit Challenges & Stormwater Master Plan Review

    In an April 2000 email, Port of Seattle executive Gina Marie Lindsey updates a Washington State Department of Ecology contact about the status of the Port's stormwater permit application related to a Comprehensive Stormwater Master Plan. She explains that while the environmental work quality was deemed strong, the submittal needed to be reformatted to meet King County's review standards rather than DOE's, with a revised package due May 5 and a County final review expected by mid-June. Lindsey also addresses concerns about potential 'piecemealing' of the permit process and expresses concern about the lengthy timeline given the County reviewer's limited weekly hours for the project.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Gina Marie Lindsey, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 … Page 43
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V