TagKing County(422)
-
2001-02-22
Exhibit 48: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Stormwater Management Plan Review for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements
Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director, King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport. The letter references -
2001-02-22
Exhibit 2040: King County Letter to Ecology Reviewing Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements
Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport. -
2000-10-24
EXH AR029027: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 24, 2000
Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations meeting held October 24, 2000, 1:30–5:00 PM. Attendees include representatives from King County (Kelly Whiting, Mark Lampard), AquaTerra (Joe Brascher), Earthtech (Rick Schaefer), Parametrix (Paul Fendt, Jim Dexter), HNTB (Alan Black), and Floyd -
2000-09-21
EXH 239: Preliminary Comments Set 1 on Aug 2000 Stormwater Management Plan STIA Master Plan Update
A September 2000 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, written on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises serious technical concerns about the Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway. The letter highlights findings from King County reviewers showing that multiple stormwater facilities in the plan were unverified, potentially infeasible, or unlikely to meet required flow control performance standards. The consultants argue that the review timeline was insufficient and that the Port of Seattle had a history of failing to deliver promised stormwater mitigation measures. -
2000-09-21
EXH AR018976: Preliminary Comments Set 1 on Aug 2000 STIA Stormwater Management Plan Master Plan Update
In September 2000, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants submitted preliminary technical comments on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raising serious concerns about the adequacy of the Stormwater Management Plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway expansion. The letter highlights findings from King County's independent review, which identified numerous cases where proposed stormwater control facilities were unverified, infeasible, or unlikely to meet required flow control performance standards. The consultants warned that the compressed public review timeline was insufficient for thorough evaluation of the plan before Ecology's 401 Certification decision. -
2000-09-15
EXH AR026129: King County DNR Letter to Ecology — Comprehensive Stormwater Mgmt Plan STIA Master Plan Update
In September 2000, King County's Department of Natural Resources provided a technical review of the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review found no fatal flaws in the plan's approach to meeting King County's stormwater standards, but identified inconsistencies in flow control calculations and water quality measures that needed to be resolved before final permitting. King County also emphasized the importance of rigorous erosion and sediment control during construction and recommended that Ecology and the Port establish a joint compliance team to oversee implementation of the complex, multi-year project. -
2000-08-10
Exhibit 119: Email Chain from Kelly Whiting Re: Landscape Management Plans and Metal Rooftop Stormwater Treatment at STIA
Email chain dated August 10, 2000 from Kelly R. Whiting, PE (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resource Division, Drainage Services Section) to Louise Kulzer and Kate Rhoads, cc David Masters, regarding Landscape Management Plans and the POS-SMP proposed approach for dealing with metal roofs at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Whiting raises -
2000-07-30
EXH AR017907: King County Drainage Services Email Chain on Copper Levels in STIA Runway Runoff and Water Quality BMPs
Email chain dated July 30, 2000 from Kelly R. Whiting, PE, King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resource Division, Drainage Services Section, to David Masters and Tom Luster (WDOE), forwarding water quality specialist Kate Rhoads’ notes on copper (Cu) levels in Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) runway stormwater runoff. Whiting discusses KCSWDM (King -
2000-04-27
Exhibit 109: Ecology Letter to Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Re: Port Of Seattle Low Streamflow Analysis Review
Letter dated April 27, 2000 from Ann E. Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office), to William A. Rozeboom and K. Malcom Leytham of Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Inc. Responds to their April 11, 2001 letter to Gordon White concerning Ecology’s review of Port Of Seattle’s December 2000 Low Streamflow Analysis. -
2000-04-24
EXH AR023713: Email Lindsey to Martha C. (Ecology) — Permit Challenges & Stormwater Master Plan Review
In an April 2000 email, Port of Seattle executive Gina Marie Lindsey updates a Washington State Department of Ecology contact about the status of the Port's stormwater permit application related to a Comprehensive Stormwater Master Plan. She explains that while the environmental work quality was deemed strong, the submittal needed to be reformatted to meet King County's review standards rather than DOE's, with a revised package due May 5 and a County final review expected by mid-June. Lindsey also addresses concerns about potential 'piecemealing' of the permit process and expresses concern about the lengthy timeline given the County reviewer's limited weekly hours for the project.