Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagKing County(456)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-30

    EXH AR022925: 401 Permit Post-Issuance Clarification STIA Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis

    Meeting notes from an October 30, 2001 technical session addressing errors discovered in the low streamflow modeling for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Consultants identified six modeling errors, including a conversion factor mistake that caused embankment flow contributions to be understated by a factor of 24, along with incorrect input files and improper groundwater routing. Representatives from the Port of Seattle, King County, the Department of Ecology, and the Army Corps of Engineers agreed on corrective revisions to be incorporated into a revised Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal required under the 401 Permit.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-25

    Exhibit 53: Pre Low Flow Meeting Briefing — King County Review of Port Of Seattle HSPF Hydrologic Modeling

    Email from Kelly Whiting (King County Department of Natural Resources, Water and Land Resources Division) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, dated October 25, 2001, summarizing a pre-meeting briefing on revised low flow hydrologic modeling related to Port Of Seattle airport embankment impacts. Discusses Hydrocomp (Norm Crawford) independent review findings, HSPF modeling errors including incorrect
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-19

    EXH AR017661: RE: Low Flow Meeting — Email Chain, October 19, 2001

    Email chain dated October 19, 2001 among Kathryn Snider (Floyd Snider McCarthy, Inc.), Kelly Whiting (Metro King County), Ann Kenny, Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle Water Resources Manager), and David Masters regarding a proposed Low Flow Meeting scheduled for October 30, 2001 at Kate Snider’s office (8:30–11:30 AM). Kelly Whiting requests a meeting agenda or
    TagsACC, King County, letter, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-01

    PCHB No. 01-133: Port Of Seattle’s Memo Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay — Declaration of Paul S. Fendt, Volume 3 of 3

    PCHB case No. 01-133, Volume 3 of 3 of Port Of Seattle’s memorandum opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for stay, containing Declaration of Paul S. Fendt. Includes August 3, 2001 letter from King County Department of Natural Resources to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue WA 98008-54552,
    TagsACC, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-10-01

    PCHB Doc 01-133: Declaration of Edward O’Brien — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Edward O’Brien, Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Program employee since 1979, filed in PCHB No. 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). O’Brien describes his familiarity with the 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for Puget Sound, the 1999 Draft Manual, and the final September 27,
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2001-09-12

    EXH AR023891: Contract Amendment Request — King County Review Services, Ecology Third Runway Permit Appeal

    This document is an email chain from September 2001 in which King County's David Masters notifies Ann Kenny that spending on a contract for technical review services provided to the Washington State Department of Ecology has exceeded its $95,000 limit by $23,695. Masters proposes amending the contract to increase the budget by $170,000 to a new total of $265,000, covering anticipated work such as low-flow analysis, preparation of appeal materials, and potential expert witness testimony. Ann Kenny forwarded the information to Michael Cheyne to facilitate the contract amendment process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH 1268: King County DNR Letter to Ecology STIA Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources wrote to the Washington Department of Ecology confirming that the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan improvements met the technical requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The review found that the plan demonstrated a feasible conceptual strategy for managing stormwater from proposed airport construction projects. Reviewers noted that while the plan showed compliance with design standards, additional oversight and monitoring would be needed as individual projects moved from planning into construction.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 … Page 46
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea-Tac Communities Plan Land Use Map: Airport and Vicinity" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V