TagFAA(684)

H.R. 4087, the 'Protecting Airport Communities from Particle Emissions Act,' introduced in October 2017, directs the FAA to study ultrafine particles (tiny airborne particles under 100 nanometers) around the 20 busiest U.S. airports, including their health effects on surrounding communities. The study must examine particle sources, concentration patterns, and health impacts such as heart disease, asthma, and nervous system disorders, with special attention to disproportionate effects on communities of color and economically vulnerable residents. The FAA is required to coordinate with the EPA and Department of Health and Human Services and report findings to Congress within two years.

FAA instrument departure procedure chart for the HAROB SIX DEPARTURE (RNAV) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. This chart provides navigation waypoints, altitudes, and takeoff minimums for aircraft departing SEA using RNAV navigation procedures.

In September 2017, Des Moines, WA resident Steve Edmiston sent a certified letter demanding that the Port of Seattle and the FAA stop increased flight operations over his historic Woodmont neighborhood, arguing that no avigation easement had ever been granted over his property. He cited a dramatic rise in aircraft noise, vibrations, fumes, and nighttime flights linked to expanded use of Sea-Tac's third runway and new navigation procedures, noting that commercial operations at the airport had nearly doubled since 2003. The letter also included a formal public records request for documents related to flight procedure changes made after February 14, 2012, and outlined legal grounds under which affected homeowners may still seek damages despite general noise liability limitations.

A federal appeals court ruled in favor of the City of Phoenix, vacating a 2014 FAA order that had implemented new flight routes and procedures at Sky Harbor International Airport. The court found the FAA's order flawed and sent the matter back to the agency for further review. The case highlights how municipalities can successfully challenge FAA flight path decisions that impact communities near airports.

A federal appeals court ruled in 2017 that the FAA acted arbitrarily when it changed flight routes at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in 2014 without adequately consulting city officials or thoroughly reviewing environmental impacts. The new routes increased air traffic over historic neighborhoods and public parks by 300%, yet the FAA conducted consultations only with low-level employees who lacked the authority to speak on the city's behalf. The case highlights the legal obligations federal agencies have to meaningfully engage local governments and assess noise impacts before implementing major flight path changes.

A federal appeals court denied a challenge by Oregon residents and an aviation watchdog group against a new runway project at Hillsboro Airport near Portland, Oregon. The court found that the Federal Aviation Administration acted properly in concluding the project would have no significant environmental impact, including only a minimal effect on air traffic and air quality. This case, a follow-up to a 2011 ruling, may be relevant to discussions of how environmental reviews are conducted for airport expansion projects in the Pacific Northwest.

The Washington Aviation System Plan (WASP), completed in July 2017 by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), is a statewide assessment of Washington's public-use airports covering both commercial and general aviation facilities. The plan evaluates how individual airports perform and interact as a system, identifies needed improvements, and develops policy recommendations to support communities, economic activity, and emergency services across the state. Funding was provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the plan builds on the earlier 2009 Long-term Air Transportation Study (LATS).

This FAA form (ARP SOP No. 5.1, effective June 2, 2017) guides airport sponsors through the process of requesting a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) determination for projects that may have extraordinary environmental circumstances. It requires sponsors to document potential impacts across key resource areas, including historic and cultural resources under the National Historic Preservation Act and protected lands under Department of Transportation Act Sections 4(f) and 6(f). Sponsors must consult with their FAA Airports District or Regional Division Office and submit all required documentation before a CATEX can be approved.