Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-17

    CASE’s reply brief supporting intervention

    Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) filed this reply brief in support of its motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, a case before the Pollution Control Hearings Board involving the Airport Communities Coalition against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. CASE agrees to abide by the existing Pre-Hearing Order and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-14

    Notice of association of counsel

    Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney files a notice of association of counsel in PCHB No. 01-160, joining Helsell Fetterman LLP and Rachael Paschal Osborn to represent Airport Communities Coalition. The case is before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, with respondents being the State of Washington Department of Ecology
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-11

    Order on motion to supplement the record

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board denied the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to supplement the record on its motion to stay the effectiveness of the re-issued § 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (amended-1) issued by the Department of Ecology. The Board found that reopening the record would not have provided new information and would have eroded the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-10

    Department of Ecology’s response to motion to intervene from Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE)

    The Washington State Department of Ecology filed a response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion’s (CASE) motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160. The Department concurs with the limits on intervention requested by the Port of Seattle and does not oppose CASE’s motion within those limits. The document includes a certificate of service confirming delivery to
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-10

    Notice of association of council

    This document is a Notice of Association of Counsel filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, in the case of Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. Assistant Attorney General Jeff B. Kray associates with Joan M. Marchioro and Thomas J. Young to represent the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-06

    Port Of Seattle’s response to motion to intervene from Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE)

    The Port of Seattle filed a response to the motion to intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, where Airport Communities Coalition appealed against the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The Port does not oppose CASE’s intervention but requests three specific limitations: no new issues beyond those
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-12-05

    ACC’s response to CASE’s motion to intervene

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a response to CASE’s Motion to Intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, stating it does not object to the motion. ACC agrees with CASE that the intervention should not interfere with the resolution of ACC’s pending Motion for Stay. The document includes a Certificate of Service confirming delivery to all
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-11-30

    Declaration of Brett Fish supporting CASE’s motion to intervene

    Brett Fish, President of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE), submits this declaration in support of CASE’s motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, an appeal by the Airport Communities Coalition regarding Ecology’s 401 Certification for the proposed third runway. Fish argues that CASE has a direct interest in the matter due to concerns about water
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-11-30

    Motion to intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion

    Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) files a motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, an appeal by Airport Communities Coalition against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The motion is based on Civil Rule 24 and WAC 371-08-420(1), and is supported by a memorandum, the Declaration of Brett Fish, and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-11-30

    Order granting intervention: Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington, Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board granted Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) permission to intervene as an appellant in an appeal by the Airport Communities Coalition challenging a Section 401 Certification issued by the Department of Ecology to the Port of Seattle. The intervention was granted under WAC 371-08-420 and CR 24(b) with limitations, including that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "A Letter To Mayor Matt Pina Of Des Moines" — , 2018

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V