TagACC(1524)

Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) files a motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, an appeal by Airport Communities Coalition against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. The motion is based on Civil Rule 24 and WAC 371-08-420(1), and is supported by a memorandum, the Declaration of Brett Fish, and

The Pollution Control Hearings Board granted Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) permission to intervene as an appellant in an appeal by the Airport Communities Coalition challenging a Section 401 Certification issued by the Department of Ecology to the Port of Seattle. The intervention was granted under WAC 371-08-420 and CR 24(b) with limitations, including that

A proposed order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington granting the Motion to Intervene filed by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in PCHB No. 01-160. The order designates CASE as a party-intervenor in the appeal brought by Airport Communities Coalition against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port

Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) filed this intervenor’s notice of appeal before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, challenging the Washington Department of Ecology’s September 21, 2001 amended Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification (Order No. 1996-4-02325 Amended-1) related to the Port of Seattle. CASE incorporates by reference the grounds, supporting

The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) replies to opposition on its motion to supplement the record in a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding. ACC argues that a recently disclosed email from Ecology expert Kelly Whiting validates fundamental flaws in the Port of Seattle’s low flow analysis and mitigation plan used for a Clean Water Act §

William A. Rozeboom, a professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, submits his third declaration to the Pollution Control Hearings Board in support of the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for stay regarding Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325. The declaration introduces his November 26, 2001 comment letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifying significant

The Pollution Control Hearings Board reconsiders its October 10, 2001 order granting Ecology’s motion to strike references to an inadvertently disclosed attorney-client privileged document used by the Airport Communities Coalition in its motion for stay. The Board affirms that the attorney-client privilege was not waived due to the inadvertent nature of the disclosure, but modifies

The Port of Seattle responds to the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion to supplement the record for the motion to stay in PCHB Case No. 01-160. The Port argues that the supplemental documents do not show deficiencies in hydrological modeling or mitigation, but rather describe the process of revising the Low Streamflow Analysis. In the alternative,

Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), writes to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identifying serious deficiencies in the Port of Seattle’s low flow mitigation analysis for Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks related to the Sea-Tac third runway project. The letter critiques the Port’s assumption that virtually all runway runoff

Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for the Port of Seattle, submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle). The declaration identifies four exhibits submitted to the Washington Department of Ecology pursuant to the amended §401 Certification on JARPA Application No.