Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • EXH0291019749

    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    Direct testimony of Ed O’Brien submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Direct testimony of Ed O’Brien, Environmental Engineer 4 at the Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in case No. 01-160 involving the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. O’Brien describes his background in stormwater engineering and notes that Ecology’s
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • EXH0290019740

    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    Direct testimony of Ann Kenny submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Direct testimony submitted by Ann Kenny, an Environmental Planner 4 at the Washington Department of Ecology, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160. The testimony covers Kenny’s role as the 401 Certification Reviewer for the Port of Seattle’s Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements, including the history of JARPA applications and
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • EXH0289019668

    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Revised direct testimony of Dave Garland, a hydrogeologist and supervisor of the Watershed Unit at the Washington Department of Ecology’s Northwest Regional Office, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in case PCHB No. 01-160. The case involves Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion as appellants against the State of Washington Department of
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    Direct testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick submitted on behalf of the Department of Ecology

    Direct testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager of the Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Section at the Washington Department of Ecology, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in a case brought by Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion against the Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle. Fitzpatrick outlines his professional qualifications
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-10-21

    Department of Ecology’s pre-filed direct testimony: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    This document is the Department of Ecology’s pre-filed direct testimony in the case of ACC & CASE v. Ecology and Port of Seattle, heard before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160). The binder cover pages establish the case caption and parties involved. A FedEx shipping airbill dated 3-7-02 is included, showing the document
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • EXH0288019667

    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • EXH0287019665

    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Glossary" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V