Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWater Quality(478)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024628: Stormwater Mixing Zones Mar 25 Meeting Discussion Doc STIA Third Runway EIS

    This technical document from a March 25 meeting discusses stormwater mixing zone analysis for proposed outfalls around Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Because standard stream flow conditions (7Q10 and 30Q5) are extremely unlikely to coincide with stormwater discharge events, Parametrix proposed a site-specific approach using higher-probability rainfall-based discharge combinations instead. The analysis found that reasonable dilution of 14- to 24-fold could occur within about 15 to 20 meters downstream, though complete mixing requirements would exceed standard regulatory width and flow percentage criteria, prompting a request for exceptions under WAC 173-201A-100.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, WAC, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024627: Handwritten Notes – Mixing Zones, NPDES, Regulatory Implications, Third Runway EIS

    Handwritten notes outline eight key discussion points related to a mixing zone (MZ) study, including an examination of stream dynamics, regulatory questions about MZ implications under NPDES permitting, and how to weigh evidence for defensibility. The notes raise questions about whether mixing zones are appropriate at all, and whether existing regulations are flexible enough to accommodate site-specific MZ conditions. A final point flags that mixing zones near water quality listing designations will be a particularly difficult policy 'sell.'
    TagsACC, Handwritten Notes, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024606: Points of Compliance — Mixing Zones & Stormwater Discharges to Surface Waters

    This document outlines regulatory problems and compliance points for stormwater discharges into Washington State surface waters, focusing on where discharges must meet water quality standards. It identifies four key unresolved issues, including the lack of an approved design storm for mixing zones and undefined critical receiving water conditions. Various example situations are provided to help determine the exact location where stormwater discharge compliance must be measured.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR024556: Mixing Zone Analysis — 3rd Runway North Discharge Miller Creek (Basin SDW-1)

    This technical document describes a mixing zone analysis for stormwater discharge from the 3rd Runway North at Sea-Tac Airport into Miller Creek, designated as Basin SDW-1. The analysis uses design storm modeling with various rainfall scenarios (2-year/2-hour, 2-year/72-hour, and 3-year/72-hour events) to calculate effluent flow rates for both acute and chronic water quality criteria. Stormwater from the basin's approximately 128 acres of pervious and impervious area is routed through a detention pond before discharge, with outflow rates determined by a storage-discharge rating curve.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR032599: Interim Permitting Approach for Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations in Storm Water Permits

    Letter and memorandum from EPA Assistant Administrator Robert Perciasepe transmitting the final Interim Permitting Approach for Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations in Storm Water Permits to State Water Program Directors and EPA Water Management Division Directors. The policy addresses NPDES storm water permit effluent limitations, adopting best management practices (BMPs) in lieu of numeric water quality-based
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, EPA, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH 2072: Fact Sheet NPDES Permit WA-002465-1 STIA

    This document is a fact sheet accompanying an NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit issued to the Port of Seattle for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, governing how the airport manages and discharges treated industrial wastewater and stormwater. It covers discharge locations into Puget Sound, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, and the City of SeaTac storm sewer system, and establishes effluent limitations and monitoring requirements. The permit addresses water quality standards, pollution prevention plans, and compliance schedules to protect surrounding waterways from airport-related contaminants.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR034994: Attachment B — Wetland Acreage Impacts by Wetland Function

    Attachment B table summarizing wetland acreage impacts by wetland function, associated with AR034994. Lists nine wetland functions including Resident/Anadromous Fish (8.6 acres), Passerine Birds (14.9 acres), Waterfowl (1.9 acres), Amphibians (9.8 acres), Small Mammals (13.2 acres), Exports Organic Matter (10.9 acres), Ground Water Exchange (13.0 acres), Flood Storage (4.6 acres), and Nutrient/Sediment Trapping (16.3 acres).
    TagsACC, Environment, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR034977: Resume of Joseph T. Brascher, Hydrologist, AQUA TERRA Consultants

    Resume of Joseph T. Brascher, Hydrologist at AQUA TERRA Consultants, Olympia, WA. Details expertise in hydrology, surface water modeling, computer programming, and web development. Experience with hydrologic modeling software packages including HSPF, SWMM, GENSCN, HEC-RAS, HYDRA, WATERWORKS, HYDRAIN, HY8, and MODFLOW. Representative assignments include Green Cove Creek Low Impact Development Study (City of Olympia), Tambark
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH 423: STIA Master Plan Update Final EIS Ch.IV §10 Water Quality & Hydrology

    This section of the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Environmental Impact Statement examines how proposed airport expansion alternatives would affect water quality and hydrology in the surrounding area, particularly Miller Creek and Des Moines Creek. The analysis finds that increased impervious surfaces would raise stormwater runoff volumes and peak flow rates, potentially causing downstream flooding and erosion, but that required detention storage facilities and mitigation measures would largely prevent significant water quality degradation. Both creeks, while classified as Class AA extraordinary waters, already show some pollution from urban stormwater runoff, though deeper regional groundwater used for drinking remains unaffected.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH 259: Declaration Donald E. Weitkamp PhD Support Opposition ACC Motion Partial Summary Judgment

    Fish biologist Donald E. Weitkamp submitted this declaration opposing a legal challenge to Sea-Tac Airport's expansion plans, arguing that the airport's stormwater controls and water quality measures adequately protect nearby streams. He concluded that the headwater portions of Miller, Walker, Des Moines, and Gilliam Creeks near the airport are unlikely to support chinook or chum salmon, as urbanization has altered those streams to favor warm-water species instead. The declaration supports the Port of Seattle's position that its Master Plan Update projects meet environmental standards and will not significantly harm local aquatic resources.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Salmon, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 48
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Trade, traffic on I-5 corridor raise vision to global level" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V