Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019658: Third Runway Soil Fill Quality Criteria

    This document outlines the Port of Seattle's soil fill quality criteria for the first phase of construction of a new runway embankment, involving approximately 820,000 cubic yards of material placed in 1998. It details the approved sources for fill material, technical specifications for soil gradation and contamination standards, and the certification and monitoring processes required of contractors. Independent soil technicians and Port consultants were tasked with overseeing material delivery, placement, and compliance testing throughout the project.
    TagsACC, Construction, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019631: Table I — Water MDLs, PQLs, Method B Values Comparison (μg/L)

    This document is a technical laboratory reference table listing method detection limits (MDLs), practical quantitation levels (PQLs), and published water quality values for a wide range of chemical compounds in various water matrices, including wastewater, groundwater, and drinking water. It compares laboratory PQL ranges against Method B groundwater and surface water standards for chemicals such as acenaphthene, acrolein, aldrin, arsenic, benzene, and PCB compounds. The table is used to assess whether analytical detection capabilities meet regulatory thresholds for water quality monitoring purposes.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019625: SSL MINTEQ Modeling — Background Pore-Water Chemistry, Assumptions, Limitations, Metal Kd Results

    This technical document describes the background water chemistry and modeling assumptions used to estimate how metals move through soil and groundwater at contaminated sites. It outlines key simplifications in the MINTEQ geochemical model, including the assumption of chemical equilibrium and the exclusion of redox potential, and presents soil-sorption values (Kd) for various metals such as arsenic, chromium, and cadmium that vary with soil pH. The results show that metal mobility is most strongly influenced by pH levels in the subsurface environment.
    TagsACC, Arsenic, EPA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019624: Three Phase Back Calculations Table — Soil Cleanup Levels

    This document presents three-phase back calculations for soil contamination levels at a site, listing various chemical constituents including heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, zinc) and petroleum products (TPH, gasoline, heavy oils). The table compares cleanup criteria from multiple regulatory frameworks including ambient water quality criteria (AWQC), drinking water standards, Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) methods, and Fish and Wildlife Service ecological screening levels. The calculations were used to evaluate soil remediation thresholds based on leaching potential and ecological risk, with source references including EPA and MTCA SSL tables dated August 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR014581: Pre-Filed Testimony of Sally Nelson on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Sally Nelson, Burien City Council member and former Mayor, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port Of Seattle. Testimony introduces ACC — an interlocal agreement entity comprising Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-26

    Staff Report and Recommendation: APL02-00002 — Appeal of SEPA Determination for Des Moines Creek Basin Restoration Projects

    This 2002 staff report from the City of SeaTac and City of Des Moines addresses an appeal by King County Water District #54 challenging an environmental (SEPA) determination related to the Des Moines Creek Basin Restoration Projects, a multi-agency effort to reduce stormwater damage and protect water quality near the Tyee Golf Course. The water district argued that the environmental review failed to adequately address potential impacts to the Highline aquifer, which serves as its sole water supply source. The hearing was scheduled before a Hearing Examiner on October 10, 2002.
    CategoriesHistory TagsACC, City Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, King County, SEPA, Third Runway
  • Apl02 00002 staff report SEPA appeal des moines creek basin restoration 2002 09 26 pdf
    2002-09-26

    Staff Report and Recommendation: APL02-00002 — Appeal of SEPA Determination for Des Moines Creek Basin Restoration Projects

    City of SeaTac and City of Des Moines joint staff report and recommendation (File No. APL02-00002) responding to appeal filed by King County Water District #54 (represented by Carl Mealy) of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) issued June 28, 2002 for the Des Moines Creek Basin Restoration Projects. Projects located at Tyee Golf Course
    CategoriesHistory TagsACC, City Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, King County, SEPA, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-17

    PCHB Doc 345: Port Of Seattle Application for Direct Review to Court of Appeals and Request for Certificate of Appealability from Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Port Of Seattle application filed in King County Superior Court (Case No. 02-2-25658-9SEA) before Judge Bruce Hilyer, seeking direct review by Washington Court of Appeals Division One of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) August 12, 2002 Order affirming Ecology’s 401 Certification (Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1341) for the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-12

    EXH AR000375: ACC and CASE Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition, composed of Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and Highline School District) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) petition for judicial review filed in Thurston County Superior Court under Administrative Procedure Act Chapter 34.05 RCW. Challenges PCHB No. 01-160 final Order of August 12, 2002 (finalized September
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-09-06

    PCHB Doc 561: Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Judicial Review of Final Order of Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in King County Superior Court (case no. 02-2-25658-9SEA) under RCW 34.05 (Administrative Procedure Act), challenging the August 12, 2002 final order of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160) regarding the 401 Certification issued by Washington Department of Ecology on September 21, 2001 for the
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Invoice #1146 – Vianair Inc. Alexandria consulting services" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V