Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-09-06

    Airport Communities Coalition statement on Port’s appeal of PCHB third runway decision

    In September 2002, the Port of Seattle filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court challenging eight of sixteen environmental protections imposed on its Third Runway project by the State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). The Airport Communities Coalition, which opposed the runway expansion, argued that this legal action proved the Port could not build the Third Runway while complying with environmental and water-quality laws. This appeal marked the third time the Port had used the courts to attempt to weaken environmental safeguards tied to the project.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-22

    Port Of Seattle’s petition for reconsideration regarding Condition 8

    The Port of Seattle filed a petition in August 2002 asking the Pollution Control Hearings Board to reconsider Condition 8 of its Final Order, which prohibited the use of a soil-testing method called SPLP (Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure) to approve fill material for the Third Runway expansion project at Sea-Tac Airport. The Port argued that banning SPLP made it nearly impossible to find acceptable fill soil, since up to 78% of naturally occurring, uncontaminated soils would fail the Board's strict numeric criteria when tested across multiple constituents. The Port maintained that proper use of SPLP poses no environmental threat to water quality and requested the Board allow its use under specific conditions so the runway project could proceed.
    TagsFill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Port Of Seattle’s Petition for Reconsideration Regarding Condition 8

    Port Of Seattle petition filed August 22, 2002 with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) requesting reconsideration of Condition 8 of the Final Order dated August 12, 2002, which prohibited use of the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) to authorize importation of fill exceeding modified fill criteria. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC)
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-01

    Impact/mitigation sites for proposed master plan update improvements at Seattle Tacoma International Airport

    This August 2002 permit application by the Port of Seattle outlines proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including the construction of a third runway, expanded taxiways, cargo facilities, and terminal upgrades. The documents map both on-site and off-site wetland mitigation areas required to offset environmental impacts, with retaining walls and creek relocations used to minimize effects on wetlands and Miller Creek. The project spans multiple sections of King County, Washington, and includes detailed plans for stormwater detention, runway safety areas, and property acquisition boundaries.
    TagsMaster Plan, Miller Creek, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-01

    Impact/mitigation sites for proposed master plan update improvements at Seattle Tacoma International Airport

    This August 2002 document outlines proposed Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), submitted by the Port of Seattle. It details construction projects including a third runway, runway safety areas, terminal expansions, and air cargo facilities, along with wetland impact mitigation measures in the Miller Creek Basin. The plans include on-site and off-site wetland mitigation areas, MSE retaining walls to minimize environmental impacts, and creek relocations across multiple sections of King County, Washington.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Master Plan, Miller Creek, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 28: ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification, and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) motion filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of the Order Publishing Certain Portions of Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses. Motion identifies three categories of discrepancies: (1)
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Proposed by ACC and CASE

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, hearing held March 18-29, 2002. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appellant and Citizens Against Airport Expansion (CASE) intervenor versus Washington State Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle respondents. Document presents proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order regarding Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-15

    EXH 347: ACC Second Supplemental Response to RFP No. 2 — Expert Witness Docs

    This document is a legal filing from the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) submitted to Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board in a case against the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle. It lists technical documents and studies relied upon by ACC's expert witnesses, covering topics such as retaining wall and slope alternatives affecting Miller Creek, seismic analysis of reinforced soil walls, and stormwater runoff management near Sea-Tac Airport. The referenced materials include engineering evaluations, water quality research, and stormwater best management practice guidelines relevant to the airport's expansion impacts.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-05-01

    EXH AR019096: Figure 2.1-3 — Wetlands Des Moines Creek Basin Near STIA

    This figure (2.1-3) is a map showing wetlands located in the Des Moines Creek Basin near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). It identifies delineated wetlands verified by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), water features, streams, and piped streams across the area, with individual wetlands labeled by alphanumeric codes. The map was submitted as part of a supplemental natural resources mitigation plan related to airport development activities in the region.
    TagsACC, Bow Lake, Des Moines Creek, Map, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-04-18

    EXH AR001887: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Redact Pre-Filed Testimony of Paul Fendt

    Reply memorandum filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, in support of ACC’s motion to redact pre-filed direct testimony of Port of Seattle expert Paul Fendt regarding Walker Creek low flow frequencies. ACC argues that Fendt’s opinions and the March 2002
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Oris Dunham 06052024_SeaTac_75th_NOW_3_103502" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V