Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Tagsoil(64)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-10-23

    EXH AR026428: Field Photo — Third Runway EIS Site Investigation (John Strand)

    This document (AR 026428) contains a photograph labeled 'john strand.jpg' showing two individuals outdoors near what appears to be environmental sampling or monitoring equipment, including hoses and collection containers, in a vegetated area. The image appears to be part of an administrative record related to environmental assessment activities, likely connected to noise or environmental impact studies near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Environmental Review, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR028011: Embankment Infiltration and Seepage — HartCrowser Presentation

    HartCrowser presentation on embankment infiltration and seepage modeling, covering seepage modeling using HELP (Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance), precipitation components including runoff, infiltration, and seepage, seepage through embankment flow in drain layer, deep percolation below drain, groundwater flow laterally in subgrade, and deep percolation through underlying till/clay. Includes embankment slope section diagram showing seepage parameters
    TagsACC, Engineering News-Record, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Stantec
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR033807: WAC 173-340-747 Deriving Soil Concentrations for Ground Water Protection — Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Project

    Exhibit AR033807, WAC 173-340-747 soil concentration calculations for ground water and surface water protection under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), SeaTac Third Runway Embankment Project. Tables derive cleanup levels for hazardous substances including antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium +3, chromium +6, copper, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, zinc, and lead using Equations 747-1 and
    TagsACC, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway, WAC
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR034975: Curriculum Vitae of C. Linn Gould, Erda Environmental Services

    Curriculum vitae of C. Linn Gould, President of Erda Environmental Services, Inc., Seattle, WA. Gould worked as Risk Assessment/Management and Wetlands Consultant from 1991 onward, including work for the Port of Seattle Third Runway project (risk-based soil criteria for embankment), Washington State petroleum contamination risk-based environmental policy (1996-2000), and remediation of the Southwest Harbor Project
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Superfund, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR034954: Third Runway Soil Fill Quality Criteria

    Port Of Seattle document establishing soil fill quality criteria for Third Runway embankment construction in 1998, covering approximately 820,000 cubic yards of fill material. Specifies Fill Borrow Material Types (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) with sieve size gradation requirements (6″, 3″, ¾”, U.S. No. 4, U.S. No. 40, U.S. No. 200), MTCA Method A
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-21

    EXH 325: VS2DT Solute Transport Variably Saturated Porous Media Table of Contents

    This technical report documents VS2DT, a computer program that models how chemical solutes move through variably saturated porous soil and rock, accounting for processes such as advection, hydrodynamic dispersion, decay, adsorption, and ion exchange. The document includes the underlying mathematical theory, numerical methods, data input instructions, and verification problems comparing the program's results against known analytical solutions. While primarily a groundwater contaminant transport modeling tool, it has no direct connection to airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019625: SSL MINTEQ Modeling — Background Pore-Water Chemistry, Assumptions, Limitations, Metal Kd Results

    This technical document describes the background water chemistry and modeling assumptions used to estimate how metals move through soil and groundwater at contaminated sites. It outlines key simplifications in the MINTEQ geochemical model, including the assumption of chemical equilibrium and the exclusion of redox potential, and presents soil-sorption values (Kd) for various metals such as arsenic, chromium, and cadmium that vary with soil pH. The results show that metal mobility is most strongly influenced by pH levels in the subsurface environment.
    TagsACC, Arsenic, EPA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019624: Three Phase Back Calculations Table — Soil Cleanup Levels

    This document presents three-phase back calculations for soil contamination levels at a site, listing various chemical constituents including heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, zinc) and petroleum products (TPH, gasoline, heavy oils). The table compares cleanup criteria from multiple regulatory frameworks including ambient water quality criteria (AWQC), drinking water standards, Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) methods, and Fish and Wildlife Service ecological screening levels. The calculations were used to evaluate soil remediation thresholds based on leaching potential and ecological risk, with source references including EPA and MTCA SSL tables dated August 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-06-01

    Results from Soil Contamination Study of King County

    A soil contamination study by Washington State's Department of Ecology and Public Health – Seattle & King County found elevated levels of arsenic and lead in southern King County soils, linked primarily to the former Asarco smelter in Ruston. Contamination levels were highest near the smelter and on Vashon and Maury Islands, with concentrations decreasing further from the source and following prevailing wind patterns. While the findings are a concern rather than an emergency, officials stress that the study reflects regional trends only and cannot predict contamination levels at individual properties.
    TagsArsenic, Ecology, King County, King County Public Health, Lead, soil, Tacoma Smelter PlumeStudy TopicsEnvironment
  • 2002-02-01

    Tacoma Smelter Plume Project: Overview Presentation

    The Washington State Department of Ecology's Tacoma Smelter Plume Project investigates soil contamination caused by air emissions from the former Asarco smelter, with the primary goal of protecting public health and the environment from low-level, area-wide contamination. The project aims to keep local governments and citizens informed while developing long-term solutions to manage contamination over time. As part of a broader Area-Wide Contamination Strategy, the state is also addressing similar issues at other sites, including the Everett Smelter and former agricultural lands.
    TagsArsenic, Asarco, Ecology, soil, Tacoma Smelter Plume

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 … Page 7
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program presentation to SAME" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V