Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Communities Plan(172)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1983-04-26

    Letter to Port Of Seattle Commissioners regarding STCP and community compatibility

    In this April 1983 letter to Port of Seattle Commissioners, a community representative reminds officials of their commitment to 'Maximum Compatibility' between Sea-Tac Airport and surrounding neighborhoods, as established through the Sea-Tac Communities Plan (STCP) begun in 1972. The letter emphasizes that citizens were promised a direct, continuing role in planning decisions—including land acquisition for safety zones and noise reduction programs—through a formal Community Involvement Process. The author calls on the commission to honor that commitment as they enter a new noise remedy program update that will reassess density guidelines near the airport.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsLand Use, letter, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Update, North Sea-Tac Park, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1983-02-04

    Airport Noise Remedy Update Work Program: Phase and Task Descriptions

    This 1983 work program outlines a study to evaluate and update Sea-Tac International Airport's aircraft noise remedy program, originally established in the 1970 Sea-Tac/Communities Plan. The study, conducted by the Port of Seattle alongside Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co. and McClure Research Company, addresses updated noise projections, progress on existing remedies, and current financial conditions. Key tasks include study design, federal funding coordination, and a Community Involvement Program to keep the public informed and engaged in noise abatement planning.
    CategoriesHistory TagsHenry M. Jackson International AIrport, Noise, Noise Mitigation, Noise Remedy Update, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1983-01-26

    PAC Subcommittee on Organization letter, January 26, 1983

    This document collection includes correspondence from 1981–1983 related to noise policy around Seattle-Tacoma (Sea-Tac) Airport. A February 1981 letter from PAC Chairman Oris Dunham to King County's Director of Planning urges the county to adopt and enforce building code sound insulation requirements — as called for in the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan adopted in 1976 — to protect nearby residents from aircraft noise. A January 1983 letter to the PAC Subcommittee on Organization outlines plans to develop a series of organizational alternatives for review at the March 23 Policy Advisory Committee meeting.
    TagsKing County, Oris Dunham, Policy Advisory Committee, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Stcp chapter unk pg 9 traffic 1983 routes and volume state and county arterials
    1983-01-01

    Sea-Tac Communities Plan: 1983 Average Daily Traffic Volumes on State and County Arterials

    A map from the Sea-Tac Communities Plan (document reference POS 20820, page 9, section 4.2.7) showing 1983 average daily traffic volumes on state and county arterials in the Sea-Tac area. The plan was sponsored by the Port of Seattle and King County, and includes a legend noting that downward-pointing triangle symbols refer to section 6.6.6 for discussion.
    TagsKing County, Map, Sea-Tac Airport, Sea-Tac Communities Plan, STCP
  • 1982-12-29

    Citizen Involvement Examples in King County, METRO and Port of Seattle

    A memorandum detailing examples of citizen involvement programs in King County, including the Policy Development Commission, METRO’s advisory committees, and the Port of Seattle’s Policy Advisory Committee. The document discusses structures, functions, and changes to these citizen participation programs.
    Tagscommunity engagement, King County Policy Development Commission, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1982-03-26

    Letter from Senator Phil Talmadge regarding FAA density guidelines and Sea-Tac Communities Plan

    In a 1982 letter to the editor titled 'Clear Zone Rules Have a Purpose,' Seattle resident Virginia E. Dana defended FAA density guidelines restricting how many people could gather on land north of Sea-Tac Airport, arguing the area was acquired to serve as a safety zone for aircraft, not a public park without limitations. She noted that the Port of Seattle purchased the land partly with federal funds to address severe noise impacts on residents, and that the FAA's people-per-acre restrictions had already been approved by community organizations, Port commissioners, and King County Council. State Senator Phil Talmadge responded with a letter commending Dana's well-reasoned position on the FAA guidelines and the Sea-Tac Communities Plan for the runway approach area.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsFAA Density Guidelines, letter, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • 1978-09-06

    Policy Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda – Sea-Tac/Communities Plan

    A 1978 internal memo from Ed Parks to Policy Advisory Committee Members announces a meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 6, 1978, at 2:00 p.m. in the Airport Conference Room at Sea-Tac International Airport. The meeting, organized as a joint effort of the Port of Seattle and King County, covers four agenda items: an update on Policy Advisory Committee Reorganization, Sea-Tac Westside Developments, the King County Capital Improvement Program for 1979, and Noise Remedy Programs.
    CategoriesMeetings TagsAdvisory Committees, King County, Noise Remedy Program, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • King County Citizen Advisory Committee Roles (Highline Community Plan/Sea-Tac Communities Plan)

    TagsHighline Community Plan, King County, Policy Advisory Committee, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Stcp pac reorg taskforce 071078 simplescanstation20220830150833 pdf

    Sea-Tac Communities Plan Policy Advisory Committee Reorganization Memo July 10, 1978

    CategoriesHistory TagsDon Shay, PAC, Policy Advisory Committee, Sea-Tac Communities Plan
  • Sea-Tac Communities Plan Policy Advisory Committee Reorganization Memo July 10, 1978

    CategoriesHistory TagsDon Shay, PAC, Policy Advisory Committee, Sea-Tac Communities Plan

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 … Page 18
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "ACC’s interrogatories nos. 1-19 and requests for production nos. 1-6 to Port Of Seattle and Port Of Seattle’s objections and responses thereto" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V