Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1855)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-02-16

    Comments on Seattle Tacoma International Airport Project: Third Runway – Embankment Fill and West MSE Wall, and Industrial Wastewater System Lagoon #3 Expansion Project on Second Public Notice

    In February 2001, engineering firm GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a technical review letter on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raising serious concerns about the proposed Third Runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review identified significant deficiencies in the geotechnical investigation and analysis supporting construction of the embankment fill and West MSE Wall, including insufficient soil strength data and inadequate seismic safety assessments. GeoSyntec warned that the proposed design — which would result in the world's tallest MSE wall built over weak, potentially unstable soils in a seismically active region — could fail under earthquake conditions, threatening both airport operations and nearby natural resources.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderRCAA
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR018360: Sheldon & Associates Response to 2000 Public Notice Comments — Water Movement Through Fill and MSE Wall

    Sheldon & Associates letter dated February 15, 2001, responding to public notice comments regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Masterplan Update Projects Section 404/401 Permits. Addresses movement of water through embankment fill and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall, drainage layer design to prevent excess pore pressures, rock underdrain clogging prevention using Group 1A filter material, shallow
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-08

    EXH AR023692: Ecology Audit Request, Grant, Agreed Order #97T-N122, STIA

    In February 2001, a Washington State Department of Ecology site manager requested an audit of a Port of Seattle grant (Grant No. G0000052) tied to Agreed Order #97T-N122, citing concerns about potential duplicate funding where costs could be covered by both the grant and cost recovery from other parties. The grant, worth up to $861,000 (split 50/50 between state and local funds), was issued to support a Phase 1 groundwater study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), investigating contamination from jet fuel and petroleum products released from underground storage tanks and fuel distribution systems. The study aimed to model groundwater flow and assess risks to nearby public drinking water wells and surface water bodies.
    TagsACC, Audit, Ecology, Grants, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10
  • 2001-02-07

    Exhibit 2059: Email and Memorandum on Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Exhibit 2059 (AR 031711–031713, ECY00010776–10778). Email from Gus Ordonez to Ann Kenny dated February 7, 2001, transmitting a memorandum from Jerald LaVassar, M.S., P.E. to Tom Luster reviewing the report ‘Evaluation of Retaining Wall/Slope Alternatives to Reduce Impacts to Miller Creek, Embankment Station 174+00 to 186+00’ for the Third Runway project at Sea-Tac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-01-28

    EXH AR053366: Handwritten Field Notes — Ace Airport View Site Visit, January 28, 2001

    Handwritten field notebook entries dated 1/28/01 documenting a site visit to Ace Airport View (DM1 – Monitoring Station) near Des Moines, referencing Des Moines Creek, SDS 1 outfall into SW associated wetlands, steep side terrain, oil boom present in unit 2, turbid water, black stones, water from outfall significantly turbid, Dr. Strand took samples at
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Handwritten Notes, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 22
  • 2001-01-25

    EXH AR049834: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Additional Information on the Seismic Design for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway

    Memorandum dated January 25, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist (EIT) and Michael Bailey (P.E.) of Hart Crowser, Inc. to the Embankment Technical Review Board (Attn: Pete Douglass), project J-4978-30, CC to Jim Thomson (P.E., HNTB). Provides additional information on seismic analyses for the Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) in SeaTac, Washington. Covers probabilistic seismic
    TagsACC, Earthquake, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-01-21

    Project AP4-4: United Airlines Disagreement with Third Runway Construction Project PFC Funding

    United Airlines formally disagreed with a proposed use of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) funds totaling $104.3 million toward a $587.4 million third runway construction project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The airline argued that the runway would not meaningfully improve national air transportation capacity, safety, or competition, noting that less than 30 seconds of average delay could actually be attributed to the absence of a third runway. United also raised concerns about potential improper diversion of federal transportation funds and warned that approving the project before its full costs were understood would set a harmful precedent.
    TagsPFC, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, United AirlinesFolderThird Runway
  • 2001-01-21

    EXH AR049825: Ecology Letter to Senator Julia Patterson on Sea-Tac Airport Expansion Section 401 Water Quality Certification Review

    Letter dated January 21, 2001 from Tom Luster, Washington State Department of Ecology, to Senator Julia Patterson of the Washington State Senate, responding to her request for information on Ecology’s Section 401 Clean Water Act review of the proposed SeaTac Airport expansion. Luster provides a brief assessment of key issues including antidegradation requirements, beneficial uses,
    TagsACC, Airport Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Julia Patterson, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 21
  • 2001-01-16

    Exhibit 159: Record of Telecon — Ann Kenny, Airport Overview Tour and Internal Meeting Notes

    Record of telecon dated 1-16-01, call from Ann Kenny (phone 425-649-4310) regarding airport overview tour, field delineation by Corps of Engineers, Jim Kelly, Kilroy building next to airport on Hwy 99, Thursday AM internal meeting, mitigation hazard plan, and California Coastal Commission. Ann wants to go out tomorrow for Corps field delineation. AR 018359, Exhibit
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Handwritten Notes, Noise Mitigation, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 08
  • 2001-01-08

    Exhibit 2137: Examining the Effects of Runway Deicing on Dissolved Oxygen in Receiving Waters: Results of the 1999-2000 Winter Season — Volume 2, Technical Appendices

    Port of Seattle technical appendices (Volume 2) to the study examining effects of runway deicing on dissolved oxygen (DO) in receiving waters at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, covering the 1999-2000 winter season. Includes QA/QC and field methods for Hydrolab instruments, Northwest Ponds DO profile data collection, continuous monitoring data assessment, tracer plots for each monitoring location,
    TagsACC, Deicing, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 14

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 … Page 186
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V