Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-09-05

    EXH AR045793: Technical Memorandum — CWA 401 Issues for Master Plan Update Projects, Port Of Seattle (Sea-Tac Airport)

    Technical memorandum dated September 5, 2000 from Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle) to Ray Helwig (Washington State Department of Ecology), cc’d to Erik Stockdale, Nancy Groves (Ecology), Jim Kelley and Paul Fendt (Parametrix), Project No. 556-2912-001(03). Addresses CWA Section 401 permit issues for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update projects involving wetlands and streams. Topics
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Lora Lake, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master PlanFolderBox 19
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR023005: ACC Analysis Proposed Mitigation Ratios STIA Third Runway Wetland Impacts

    A September 2000 report by Azous Environmental Sciences, commissioned by the Airport Communities Coalition, critically analyzes the Port of Seattle's wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction project. The report identifies numerous errors in wetland acreage accounting, inadequate mitigation ratios, and flaws in the proposed compensatory measures, including out-of-basin mitigation that fails to replace lost wetland functions in the affected Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creek watersheds. The author concludes that the Port's plan falls short of Washington State Department of Ecology standards and the regulatory goal of no net loss of wetland functions.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR028056: Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport Reinforced Earth Design Calculations

    Reinforced Earth Company (job number 8079, designer MJB, dated 09/01/00) design calculations for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac International Airport, West Wall 181+25. Document covers internal and external stability analysis for a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) retaining wall structure including design parameters (select backfill φ=37°, γ=0.140 kcf, Ka=0.24858; random backfill φ=35°, γ=0.140 kcf, Ka=0.27269; foundation φ=35°,
    TagsACC, Engineering News-Record, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR025072: Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Preliminary Design — STIA

    This September 2000 preliminary design report, prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for the Port of Seattle, outlines a plan to augment water flow in Des Moines Creek near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report covers facility configuration, process components such as backflow prevention, dechlorination, and aeration systems, as well as an evaluation of chemical dechlorination alternatives. The project was designed to improve creek water quality by treating and releasing water in a controlled manner.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-21

    EXH AR021335: ACC Assessment — Proposed Drinking Water Augment Summer Low Flows Miller Creek & Des Moines Creek

    A fisheries biologist assessed the Port of Seattle's plan to use City of Seattle drinking water to boost summer flows in Miller and Des Moines Creeks when levels drop below 1.0 cubic feet per second. The report concludes that chlorine and fluoride in drinking water are toxic to fish and other aquatic life at very low concentrations, and that mixing drinking water into these small streams would far exceed Washington State water quality standards even with dilution. The biologist recommended against the plan and suggested that treated well water from within the local watersheds might be a less harmful alternative.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2000-08-21

    EXH 368: Columbia Biological Assessments Letter to Ecology – Drinking Water Flow Augmentation, Miller & Des Moines Creeks

    A fisheries biologist, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, assessed the Port of Seattle's plan to use City of Seattle drinking water to boost low summer flows in Miller and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport. The report concludes that the drinking water's chlorine and fluoride content would be highly toxic to fish and other aquatic life, far exceeding Washington State water quality standards even after dilution in the streams. The biologist recommends against the plan and suggests that well water from within the local watersheds may be a less harmful alternative.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2000-08-18

    EXH AR027600: Port Of Seattle Letter to Seattle Public Utilities Regarding Des Moines Creek Basin Plan Flow Augmentation Facility

    Letter dated August 18, 2000 from Keith R. Smith, Water Resources Manager at Port Of Seattle (Seattle-Tacoma International Airport), to Jillian Hoyt of Seattle Public Utilities, regarding the Des Moines Creek Basin Plan Flow Augmentation Facility. The Port seeks to purchase water from SPU as an alternate supply for the proposed flow augmentation facility, which
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Des Moines Creek, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-18

    EXH AR023766: Revised Flow Augmentation Implementation Plan Des Moines Creek

    In August 2000, the Port of Seattle submitted a revised implementation plan to the Washington Department of Ecology for a flow augmentation facility on Des Moines Creek, near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The plan outlines two potential water sources — a Port-owned well used to irrigate the Tyce Valley Golf Course, or water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities — along with details on pipeline construction, dechlorination treatment options, and pump configurations. Construction of the facility was scheduled to begin in June 2002, with the well preferred as the lower-cost option pending resolution of water rights issues.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SR509, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-16

    EXH AR022982: ACC Review Wetlands Mitigation Plan STIA Third Runway Construction

    A wetland scientist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed the Port of Seattle's proposed wetland mitigation plan for the SeaTac Third Runway construction and concluded it was wholly inadequate. The report argues that the planned out-of-basin mitigation at an Auburn site fails to replace the wetland functions lost in the Walker Creek, Des Moines Creek, and Miller Creek watersheds, and that placing mitigation in a different drainage basin cannot scientifically compensate for local losses under Washington State environmental law. The reviewer also warns that the Auburn mitigation site faces multiple risks and is unlikely to be sustainable long-term.
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-08-14

    Exhibit 725: Memorandum on Critical Condition for WER-Related Sampling, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Stormwater Discharge into Miller Creek

    Memorandum from Brian Pippin (Parametrix, Inc.) to Linda Logan (cc: John Brooker), dated August 14, 2000, Project Number 556-2912-001, Port of Seattle WERs. Discusses critical conditions for Water Effect Ratio (WER) sampling per the Permit Writers Manual for the third runway treated stormwater discharge into Miller Creek. Uses HSPF hindcasting over 49-year period to evaluate
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Department of Defense Logo" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V