Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagBoeing Field(54)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2006-02-27

    PSRC General chronology: Regional commercial airport capacity decisions in the Central Puget Sound Region

    This document traces the history of commercial airport capacity and noise policy decisions in the Central Puget Sound region from 1973 to 2006, focusing on Sea-Tac Airport. It covers key milestones such as the Port of Seattle's various noise mitigation programs, agreements with the Highline School District, and debates over building a third runway and expanding Boeing Field. The chronology highlights the ongoing tension between meeting growing air travel demand and addressing the noise impacts on surrounding communities and schools.
    TagsAlaska Air, Boeing Field, KCIA, King County, King County International Airport, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Southwest Airlines, Third Runway, TimelineFolderPuget Sound Regional Council
  • 2005-10-11

    Statement of King County Executive Ron Sims Regarding the Rejection of Proposals by Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines to Move Commercial Passenger Service to King County International Airport (KCIA)

    In October 2005, King County Executive Ron Sims rejected proposals from Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines to move commercial passenger service to Boeing Field (King County International Airport). Southwest had proposed an $130 million, 8-gate terminal for up to 85 flights per day, while Alaska Airlines followed with a $150 million proposal for up to 100 flights per day, but the competing proposals together would have required costly environmental review, significant public funding, and were projected to cause major noise and traffic impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Sims concluded that while either proposal alone might have been feasible, accommodating both was impossible under his criteria of no taxpayer subsidies and no significant noise or traffic harm to communities.
    TagsAlaska Air, Boeing Field, KCIA, King County, Southwest AirlinesFolderKCIA (Boeing Field)
  • 2005-07-26

    Port Of Seattle Commission Special Meeting Minutes: July 26, 2005

    Approved minutes of the Port Of Seattle Commission special meeting held July 26, 2005 at the International Conference Center, Airport Office Building, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Commissioners Davis, Edwards, Fisken, and Miller present; Molloy absent. Meeting included executive session on legal risk and potential litigation, followed by a policy and staff briefing by Mark Reis, Managing
    CategoriesMeetings TagsBoeing Field, KCIA, Mark Reis, Port Of Seattle Commission, Southwest Airlines, Third RunwayFolder2005
  • 2026 09 02 01 1st installment port commission aviation cip july 26, 2005 pdf
    2005-07-26

    Port Of Seattle Commission Special Meeting Minutes: July 26, 2005

    Approved minutes of the Port Of Seattle Commission special meeting held July 26, 2005 at the International Conference Center, Airport Office Building, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Commissioners Davis, Edwards, Fisken, and Miller present; Molloy absent. Meeting included executive session on legal risk and potential litigation, followed by a policy and staff briefing by Mark Reis, Managing
    TagsBoeing Field, KCIA, Mark Reis, Port Of Seattle Commission, Southwest AirlinesFolder2005
  • 2004-02-23

    NEPA Environmental Assessment/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Master Plan Improvements at King County International Airport (Boeing Field)

    Preliminary Draft NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) and SEPA Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by King County for proposed Master Plan improvements at King County International Airport (Boeing Field/BFI), dated February 23, 2004. Covers FAA review process, public comment period with hearing scheduled April 5, 2004, and potential outcomes including Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
    TagsBoeing Field, Environmental Impact Statement, KCIA, Master Plan, NEPAFolderKCIA (Boeing Field)
  • NEPA environmental assessment SEPA EIS 2004 pdf
    2004-02-23

    NEPA Environmental Assessment/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Master Plan Improvements at King County International Airport (Boeing Field)

    Preliminary Draft NEPA Environmental Assessment (EA) and SEPA Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by King County for proposed Master Plan improvements at King County International Airport (Boeing Field/BFI), dated February 23, 2004. Covers FAA review process, public comment period with hearing scheduled April 5, 2004, and potential outcomes including Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
    TagsBoeing Field, Environmental Impact Statement, KCIA, Master Plan, NEPAFolderKCIA (Boeing Field)
  • 2002-10-23

    EXH AR038735: Interlocal Agreement, Airport Communities Coalition

    Interlocal Agreement establishing the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) under the Interlocal Cooperation Act (RCW Chapter 39.34), signed by the cities of Normandy Park, Des Moines, Burien, Federal Way, and Tukwila, each a Washington Municipal Corporation. The agreement opposes construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, opposes increased air traffic at Boeing Field, seeks
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Boeing Field, Four Post Plan, Interlocal Agreement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 16
  • 2001-06-22

    Aerial View of Sea-Tac Airport Construction and East Airfield Development

    Aerial photograph looking north over Sea-Tac Airport showing active construction, including what appears to be a new terminal or cargo facility under development on the airfield's east side, a retention pond, and the main runway complex. The Boeing facility and hangars are visible in the upper left, consistent with the airport's proximity to Boeing Field/King County International Airport area.
    TagsAirport Expansion, Boeing Field, Construction, Sea-Tac AirportFolderWatershed Aerial Photos
  • 1992-07-01

    Sea-Tac Airspace Update Study: Comparison of 1988 Airspace Update Study, 1992 Terminal Development Plan, and the 1991 Enhancement Plan

    This 1992 study compares three planning reports on Sea-Tac Airport's future capacity and delays: the 1988 Airspace Update Study, the 1992 Terminal Development Plan, and the 1991 Enhancement Plan. The reports differ significantly in their passenger and flight operation projections for the year 2000, and show striking discrepancies in delay estimates — with the Enhancement Plan projecting delay hours more than five times higher than the Airspace Update Study. The document also outlines proposed solutions to reduce delays, including new runway construction, airspace conflict resolution with nearby Boeing Field, and improved approach procedures.
    TagsAirspace Study, Boeing Field, Forecast, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, StatisticsFolderRCAA
  • 1982-10-27

    Evaluation of Alternative Measures: Chapter 7, Shared Airspace Study

    This draft chapter evaluates alternative measures to reduce growing aircraft delays caused by airspace interactions between Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) and Boeing Field, which are projected to worsen significantly between 1990 and 2000. Three main approaches are examined: improving air traffic control (ATC) technology to allow reduced aircraft separations, expanding airport facilities through new runways or reliever airports, and managing demand through flight quotas or peak-period pricing. The chapter concludes that a combination of these measures will likely be necessary, and that action should begin immediately since implementation could take until 1990 when the delays are expected to become critical.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, Airspace Study, Boeing Field, KCIA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderShared Airspace Study

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V