Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-12

    ACC’s opposition to Ecology’s motion to strike documents, motion to rescind ex parte order and for reconsideration by full board, and request for hearing per WAC 371-08-450(3)

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) opposes the Washington Department of Ecology’s motion to strike documents related to a public disclosure request concerning the Port of Seattle’s third runway application. ACC argues the documents were not inadvertently disclosed, that attorney-client privilege was waived by the client’s own disclosure, and that the Board lacks jurisdiction to order
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    Airport Communities Coalition’s preliminary list of legal issues, witnesses and exhibits

    The Airport Communities Coalition filed this preliminary list of legal issues with the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, challenging the Department of Ecology’s Section 401 water quality certification for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project. The document raises numerous legal questions about whether the certification provides reasonable assurance of compliance with
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    ACC’s sur-rebuttal in support of its motion for a stay

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed this sur-rebuttal before the Pollution Control Hearings Board challenging the Department of Ecology’s Section 401 Certification and CZMA concurrency statement issued for the Port of Seattle. ACC argues that the amended certification conditions fail to provide reasonable assurance of water quality standards compliance, citing inadequate fill contaminant criteria (including
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    Declaration of Amanda Azous in support of ACC’s sur-reply on motion for stay

    Amanda Azous, a wetland scientist, declares that the Port of Seattle’s hydrologic monitoring of wetlands is inadequate to protect remaining wetlands or restore conditions if the Section 401 Certification is rescinded. She identifies Wetlands 18 and 37 as being in immediate danger of irrevocable alteration due to the Port’s near-term fill plans, and argues that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon in support of ACC’s sur-reply on motion for stay

    Dyanne Sheldon, a wetland specialist, submits a declaration challenging the adequacy of pre-construction groundwater monitoring standards in the Port of Seattle’s 401 Certification. She argues that the Performance Standards in the NRMP are imprecise and unmeasurable, that reliance on ‘normal rainfall’ as a baseline is contradictory, and that using wetland indicator status (WIS) ratings as
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    Second declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia in support of ACC’s motion for stay

    Dr. Patrick Lucia provides a second declaration supporting the Airport Communities Coalition’s motion for a stay of the Section 401 Certification issued to the Port of Seattle for the Third Runway embankment project at Sea-Tac Airport. The declaration argues that the Department of Ecology lacks reasonable assurance that fill material used in the embankment meets
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-11

    Declaration of Dr. John Strand in support of ACC’s sur-reply on motion for stay

    Dr. John Strand submits a declaration in support of the Airport Communities Coalition’s sur-reply on a motion for stay regarding Washington Department of Ecology’s Section 401 Certification and CZMA concurrency statement for the Port of Seattle. The declaration addresses contamination concerns with soils already accepted by the Port, critiques the Declaration of C. Linn Gould,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-10

    Respondent Port Of Seattle’s preliminary list of issues, witnesses and exhibits

    The Port of Seattle submits its preliminary list of issues, witnesses, and exhibits to the Pollution Control Hearings Board in response to an appeal by the Airport Communities Coalition. The document outlines 17 potential issues related to the §401 Water Quality Certification for projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, covering topics such as wetland impacts, stream
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-10

    ACC’s reply on motion to file overlength reply brief

    The Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) replies to objections from the Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle regarding ACC’s motion to file an overlength reply brief. ACC argues that Ecology and the Port embedded extensive legal arguments within declarations to circumvent page limits, and that ACC requires additional pages to respond to 56
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-10-10

    ACC’s reply memorandum in support of its motion for a stay

    This document is a reply memorandum filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in support of its motion for a stay, arguing that the Amended Certification sets acceptable soil contamination levels too high to protect water quality. The brief highlights that DOE’s own expert calculations show contaminants like Antimony and Arsenic are permitted at levels
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "January 8, 2018 Aviation Advisory Committee Minutes" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V