Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-12-10

    PCHB Doc 5830: Ecology Response to Motion to Intervene from CASE

    Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology concurs with Port Of Seattle’s requested limits on intervention and does not oppose CASE’s motion. Filed December 10, 2001; signed
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-12-10

    EXH AR005834: Notice of Association of Counsel — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Notice of Association of Counsel filed December 10, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160, before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Jeff B. Kray, Assistant Attorney General, Ecology Division, associates with Joan M. Marchioro and Thomas J. Young to represent the Washington State Department of Ecology. Appellant is Airport Communities Coalition; respondents are State
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-12-07

    EXH 450: Ecology Draft Memo Requesting Ching-Pi Wang Review Third Runway Embankment Seepage Groundwater Monitoring Plan

    In December 2001, Ann Kenny of the Washington Department of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office drafted a memo requesting that hydrogeologist Ching-Pi Wang review a groundwater and seepage monitoring plan submitted by the Port of Seattle for the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The plan, titled 'Third Runway Embankment Seepage and Groundwater Monitoring Plan,' was submitted on November 16, 2001, and required expert review before Ecology could approve it. Wang was asked to provide written comments on the plan's adequacy and any recommended changes by January 18, 2002.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-12-06

    EXH AR005836: Port Of Seattle’s Response to Motion to Intervene from CASE, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle response filed December 6, 2001 to motion to intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port does not oppose CASE intervention if limited under WAC 371-08-420(1): CASE barred from raising new
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-12-05

    EXH AR005840: ACC’s Response to CASE’s Motion to Intervene, PCHB No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) Motion to Intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, filed December 5, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. ACC does not object to CASE’s intervention but agrees it should not interfere with ACC’s pending Motion for Stay. Respondents are State
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-12-05

    EXH AR030790: Ecology Letter to San Juan County — Ayer Property Wetland Conversion Concerns, Orcas Island

    Letter dated December 5, 2001 from Sarah Suggs, Wetlands Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology (Northwest Regional Office) to Grant Beck, Director, San Juan County Permit Center, regarding the Ayer property wetland restoration proposal on Orcas Island. Ecology characterizes the proposal as a wetland conversion (not restoration) under Chapter 90.48 RCW and Chapter 173-201A WAC,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCW, SEPA, Water QualityFolderBox 12
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR052659: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements

    Parametrix, Inc. report prepared for Port of Seattle, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements, December 2001. AR 052659/052660/052661. Volume 1 includes main text and Appendices B through J. Sub-consultants include Aqua Terra Consultants, Earth Tech Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, HNTB, and Pacific Groundwater Group. Addresses low streamflow analysis and summer low flow impact
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Master Plan, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Water QualityFolderBox 22
  • 2001-12-01

    Exhibit 199: Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek 7-Day Low-Flow Calibration Analysis, STIA Master Plan Update

    This technical document compares observed and model-predicted 7-day low streamflows for Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek near Seattle-Tacoma Airport for water years 1991–1996. Results show that calibrated (simulated) flows generally underestimated observed flows at most gage locations, with the exception of 1995, when the model overpredicted flows. Discrepancies at upstream gage locations are attributed to uncertain groundwater conditions within the watersheds.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin PlanFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH 273: Low Streamflow Analysis — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements

    This technical report analyzes low streamflow conditions in three creeks near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks) to assess the potential impacts of airport construction projects on summer water flows. Using a 47-year record of streamflow data and computer modeling tools, analysts determined target streamflow levels for each creek and evaluated how proposed runway and infrastructure improvements might affect seasonal low-flow periods critical to salmon habitat. The study found existing summer low streamflow targets of 0.33 cfs for Des Moines Creek, 0.77 cfs for Walker Creek, and 0.73 cfs for Miller Creek, which were used to guide mitigation planning.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR030065: Wetland Functional Assessment and Impact Analysis — Master Plan Update Improvements, Sea-Tac Airport

    Wetland Functional Assessment and Impact Analysis prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for Port Of Seattle, December 2001, project number 556-2912-001 (03). Assesses wetland functions and impacts associated with Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements including the new Third Runway, Runway Safety Areas (RSAs), relocation of South 154th Street, Borrow Area 1 excavation, South Aviation Support
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SASA, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 12

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V